Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy effectively fragments urinary calculi in the upper urinary tract and upper ureter. These fragments pass completely by 3 months in 77.4 per cent of the patients with single stones. Risk of obstruction, increased postoperative pain, need for additional urological operations and retained fragments are low for stones less than 1 cm. in size. As the number of stones treated or single stone size increases above 1 cm. the risk for these factors increases. Adjunctive urological surgical management is required in 9 per cent of the patients preoperatively and 8 per cent postoperatively. Only 0.6 per cent of the patients require some type of open operation to resolve the stone problems after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Hemorrhage, obstruction by fragments, severe pain and urinary infection all constitute known complications and require careful urological management of all patients. Hospitalization averages 2 days after treatment and patients usually return to work within a few days after they are discharged from the hospital.

A total of 982 patients underwent 1,416 treatments with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi between February 23 and December 17, 1984. A single treatment was performed in 90 per cent of the patients. Morbidity was extremely low and hospital stay was short (3.0 days). Adjunctive procedures were required in 13 per cent of the patients. Of the kidneys 72 per cent were free of stones at the 3-month followup, while 23 per cent contained small (less than 5 mm.), asymptomatic fragments believed to be passable spontaneously. Only 1 per cent of the patients required surgical removal of the calculi. Morbidity was related directly to stone burden, while results were inversely related to stone burden. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the preferred form of management for symptomatic upper ureteral and renal calculi less than 2 cm. in diameter.

Two new therapies, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, are revolutionizing the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. We report the success and morbidity rates in 110 patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and 982 patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Staghorn calculi were excluded from this series. The over-all success rate (free of stones plus small asymptomatic residual fragments) was comparable with both modalities (percutaneous nephrostolithotomy 98 per cent and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 95 per cent), although the presence of residual fragments was more common in kidneys treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (24 versus 7 per cent). Patient morbidity as measured by temperature elevation, length of postoperative stay, pain and blood loss was significantly less (p less than 0.05) with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy than with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Re-treatment rates were similar with both procedures, and tended to increase in relation to increasing stone size and stone number. Post-treatment ancillary procedures (cystoscopy and stone manipulation, and percutaneous nephrostomy) were used more frequently with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Because of its efficacy and low morbidity, we conclude that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the treatment of choice for upper urinary tract calculi less than 2 cm. in diameter. However, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy will continue to have a primary role in the management of larger stones and cystine stones, and it will be used as a secondary procedure after unsuccessful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments. In addition, because of the complimentary nature of these 2 new technologies certain complex stones, such as staghorn calculi, may be handled best by a combination of the 2 techniques.

No abstract

Treatment recommendations and results reported for the management of staghorn calculi are highly variable. In an attempt to provide a more objective means to compare treatment results for staghorn renal calculi, stone burden as measured by stone surface area was used. Stone surface area was determined by computer analysis. A total of 380 cases of staghorn calculi treated at the same institution was evaluated. Treatment consisted of initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy with or without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) in 298 cases and ESWL monotherapy in 82. When considered as a group, the overall stone-free rate for initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (mean surface area 1,378.3 mm.2) was 84.2% compared to 51.2% (p less than 0.0001) for ESWL monotherapy (mean surface area 693.4 mm.2). For staghorn calculi smaller than 500 mm.2 a stone-free rate of 94.4% was achieved in the percutaneous nephrostolithotomy with or without ESWL group compared to 63.2% for ESWL monotherapy (p = 0.0214). For calculi of 501 to 1,000 mm.2 the stone-free rates were 86% and 45.7%, respectively (p less than 0.0001). When stone surface area exceeded 1,000 mm.2 the stone-free rate for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy with or without ESWL was 82.4% but it was only 22.2% for ESWL monotherapy (p = 0.0002). Overall, when adjusted for stone surface area the odds of being stone-free were more than 8 times higher for initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus ESWL monotherapy (odds ratio = 8.36, p less than 0.0001). While percutaneous nephrostolithotomy with or without ESWL appears to be the procedure of choice for most staghorn stones, ESWL monotherapy may have a role for some stones smaller than 500 mm.2. In 12 such cases associated with a nondilated renal collecting system (mean surface area 380.5 mm.2) a stone-free rate of 91.7% was achieved. The number of procedures required to complete therapy was higher in the initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy group (2.8 versus 2.1, p less than 0.0001). Although complications were more common in the ESWL monotherapy group (manifested as obstruction in 30.5%), bleeding requiring blood transfusion was more frequent in the initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy group (9.4%).

No abstract

Subcapsular or perirenal bleeding is the most commonly experienced adverse effect directly attributable to externally applied shock waves. The first consecutive 3,620 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments with the HM3 Dornier lithotriptor at our institution resulted in 24 hematomas in 21 patients, for an incidence of 0.66 per cent. Various factors associated with treatment were examined. The number of shock waves (up to 2,000) and voltage up to 24 kv. did not correlate with the development of hematoma. Coagulation studies were normal in all patients with hematomas. There was no correlation of patients size and weight, or stone size, number or location with the occurrence rate of perinephric hematoma. Patients with pre-existing hypertension, particularly those with unsatisfactory control of hypertension, had a significantly increased incidence of perinephric hematoma. The incidence of hematoma in hypertensive patients was 2.5 per cent and it increased to 3.8 per cent in patients with unsatisfactory control of hypertension. Therefore, pre-existing hypertension is a significant risk factor in the occurrence of post-extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy bleeding. The incidence of perinephric hematoma also was increased in patients with pre-treatment urinary tract infection and those who underwent simultaneous bilateral treatment. Management of post-extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy bleeding generally is conservative although a third of the patients required transfusion.

No abstract