No abstract

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, originally developed as glucose-lowering agents, have been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalizations in patients with type 2 diabetes without established heart failure, and in patients with heart failure with and without diabetes. Their role in patients with heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction remains unknown.

BACKGROUND: Goals of management in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction include reducing death and hospitalizations, and improving health status (symptoms, physical function, and quality of life). In the DAPA-HF trial (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin, reduced death and hospitalizations, and improved symptoms in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. In this analysis, we examine the effects of dapagliflozin on a broad range of health status outcomes, using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). METHODS:KCCQ was evaluated at randomization, 4 and 8 months. Patients were divided by baseline KCCQ total symptom score (TSS); Cox proportional hazards models examined the effects of dapagliflozin on clinical events across these subgroups. We also evaluated the effects of dapagliflozin on KCCQ-TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score. Responder analyses were performed to compare proportions of dapagliflozin versus placebo-treated patients with clinically meaningful changes in KCCQ at 8 months. RESULTS:A total of 4443 patients had available KCCQ at baseline (median KCCQ-TSS, 77.1 [interquartile range, 58.3-91.7]). The effects of dapagliflozin vs placebo on reducing cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure were consistent across the range of KCCQ-TSS (lowest to highest tertile: hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.61-0.98]; hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46-0.83]; P for heterogeneity=0.52). Patients treated with dapagliflozin had greater improvement in mean KCCQ-TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score at 8 months (2.8, 2.5 and 2.3 points higher versus placebo; P<0.0001 for all). Fewer patients treated with dapagliflozin had a deterioration in KCCQ-TSS (odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78-0.90]; P<0.0001); and more patients had at least small, moderate, and large improvements (odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.23]; odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.08-1.22]; odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.07-1.22]; number needed to treat=14, 15, and 18, respectively; P<0.0001 for all; results consistent for KCCQ clinical summary score and overall summary score). CONCLUSIONS:Dapagliflozin reduced cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure across the range of baseline KCCQ, and improved symptoms, physical function, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Furthermore, dapagliflozin increased the proportion of patients experiencing at least small, moderate, and large improvements in health status; these effects were clinically important.

AimsThe optimal platelet inhibition strategy for ACS patients managed without revascularization is unknown.We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in the non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) subgroup of the PLATO trial, in the total cohort, and in the subgroups managed with and without revascularization within 10 days of randomization.Methods and resultsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke. Among 18 624 PLATO patients, 11 080 (59%) were categorized as NSTE-ACS at randomization. During the initial 10 days, 74% had angiography, 46% PCI, and 5% CABG. In NSTE-ACS patients, the primary endpoint was reduced with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel [10.0 vs. 12.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74–0.93], as was myocardial infarction (6.6 vs. 7.7%; HR 0.86; 95% CI = 0.74–0.99), cardiovascular death (3.7 vs. 4.9%; HR 0.77; 95% CI = 0.64–0.93), and all-cause death (4.3 vs. 5.8%; HR 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64–0.90). Major bleeding rate was similar between treatment groups (13.4 vs. 12.6%; HR 1.07; 95% CI = 0.95–1.19), but ticagrelor was associated with an increase in non-CABG major bleeding (4.8 vs. 3.8%; HR 1.28; 95% CI = 1.05–1.56). Within the first 10 days, 5366 (48.4%) patients were managed without revascularization. Regardless of revascularization or not, ticagrelor consistently reduced the primary outcome (HR 0.86 vs. 0.85, interaction P = 0.93), and all-cause death (HR 0.75 vs. 0.73, interaction P = 0.89) with no significant increase in overall major bleeding.ConclusionIn patients with NSTE-ACS, benefit of ticagrelor over clopidogrel in reducing ischaemic events and total mortality was consistent with the overall PLATO trial, independent of actually performed revascularization during the initial 10 days.

Background: In the DAPA-HF trial, the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduced the risk of worsening heart failure and death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. We examined efficacy and tolerability of dapagliflozin in relation to background diuretic treatment and change in diuretic therapy following randomization to dapagliflozin or placebo. Methods: We examined the effects of study treatment in the following subgroups: no diuretic, diuretic dose equivalent to furosemide <40mg daily, 40mg daily and >40mg daily at baseline. We examined the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death or a worsening HF event, its components, all-cause death and symptoms. Results: Of 4616 analyzable patients, 736 (15.9%) were on no diuretic, 1311 (28.4%) were on <40mg, 1365 (29.6%) on 40 mg and 1204 (26.1%) of patients were taking >40 mg. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary endpoint across each of these subgroups: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57 (95% CI 0.36-0.92), 0.83 (0.63-1.10), 0.77 (0.60-0.99) and 0.78 (0.63-0.97), respectively (P-interaction 0.61). The HR in patients taking any diuretic was 0.78 (0.68-0.90). Improvement in symptoms and treatment toleration was consistent across the diuretic subgroups. Diuretic dose did not change in most patients during follow-up and mean diuretic dose did not differ between the dapagliflozin and placebo group after randomization. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin was consistent across the diuretic subgroups examined in DAPA-HF. Clinical Trial Registration: DAPA-HF: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03036124

Whether the sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduces the risk of a range of morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients with heart failure regardless of ejection fraction is unknown. A patient-level pooled meta-analysis of two trials testing dapagliflozin in participants with heart failure and different ranges of left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40% and >40%) was pre-specified to examine the effect of treatment on endpoints that neither trial, individually, was powered for and to test the consistency of the effect of dapagliflozin across the range of ejection fractions. The pre-specified endpoints were: death from cardiovascular causes; death from any cause; total hospital admissions for heart failure; and the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs)). A total of 11,007 participants with a mean ejection fraction of 44% (s.d. 14%) were included. Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–0.97; P = 0.01), death from any cause (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.99; P = 0.03), total hospital admissions for heart failure (rate ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.65–0.78; P < 0.001) and MACEs (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–1.00; P = 0.045). There was no evidence that the effect of dapagliflozin differed by ejection fraction. In a patient-level pooled meta-analysis covering the full range of ejection fractions in patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes and hospital admissions for heart failure (PROSPERO: CRD42022346524).

Background Both the angiotensin receptor neprilysin-inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan and the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduced cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.Whether either of these classes of drugs influences the effectiveness or safety of the other remains unknown. MethodsWe assessed the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients who were or were not taking sacubitril/valsartan at baseline in the DAPA-HF trial, a 4744 patient trial comparing dapagliflozin to placebo in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. We evaluated whether treatment with sacubitril/valsartan at baseline modified the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin, examining the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints and predefined safety assessments. Results 508 patients (10.9%) enrolled in DAPA-HF were treated with sacubitril/valsartan at baseline. Patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan were more likely to be from North America or Europe, to have lower ejection fraction, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but were similar with respect to age, NYHA class, history of diabetes and use of other evidence-based heart failure therapies. The benefit of dapagliflozin compared with placebo was similar in patients taking sacubitril/valsartan (HR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.50, 1.13), compared with those not taking sacubitril/valsartan (HR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.86) for the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure; similar findings were observed for secondary endpoints. All measures of safety, including episodes related to

Background: Varicose veins are a common problem with no approved medical therapies. While it is believed that varicose vein pathogenesis is multifactorial, there is a limited understanding of the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to their formation. Large-scale studies of risk factors for varicose veins may highlight important aspects of pathophysiology and identify groups at increased risk for disease. Methods: We applied machine learning to agnostically search for risk factors of varicose veins in 493,519 individuals in the UK Biobank. Predictors were further studied using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis (2,441 incident events). A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of varicose veins was also performed among 337,536 unrelated individuals (9,577 cases) of white British descent, followed by eQTL and pathway analyses. Because height emerged as a new candidate risk factor, we performed Mendelian randomization analyses to assess a potential causal role for height in varicose vein development. Results: Machine learning confirmed several known (age, sex, obesity, pregnancy, history of deep vein thrombosis) and identified several new risk factors for varicose vein disease, including height. After adjusting for traditional risk factors in Cox regression, greater height remained independently associated with varicose veins (HR for upper vs. lower quartile: 1·74; 95% CI: 1·51–2·01, P<0·0001). A GWAS identified 30 new genome-wide significant loci, identifying pathways involved in vascular development and skeletal/limb biology. Mendelian randomization analysis provided evidence that increased height is causally related to varicose veins (Inverse-variance weighted: OR=1·26; P=2·07×10−16). Conclusions: Using data from nearly half a million individuals, we present a comprehensive genetic and epidemiological study of varicose veins. We identified novel clinical and genetic risk factors which provide pathophysiological insights and could help future improvements of treatment of varicose vein disease.