Our purposes were to determine the incidence of BK viruria, viremia or nephropathy with tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine (CyA) and whether intensive monitoring and discontinuation of mycophenolate (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA), upon detection of BK viremia, could prevent BK nephropathy.We randomized 200 adult renal transplant recipients to FK506 (n = 134) or CyA (n = 66). Urine and blood were collected weekly for 16 weeks and at months 5, 6, 9 and 12 and analyzed for BK by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By 1 year, 70 patients (35%) developed viruria and 23 (11.5%) viremia; neither were affected independently by FK506, CyA, MMF or AZA. Viruria was highest with FK506-MMF (46%) and lowest with CyA-MMF (13%), p = 0.005. Viruria ≥ 9.5 log 10 copies/mL was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of viremia and a 13-fold increased risk of sustained viremia. After reduction of immunosuppression, viremia resolved in 95%, without increased acute rejection, allograft dysfunction or graft loss. No BK nephropathy was observed.Choice of calcineurin inhibitor or adjuvant immunosuppression, independently, did not affect BK viruria or viremia. Viruria was highest with FK506-MMF and lowest with CyA-MMF. Monitoring and preemptive withdrawal of immunosuppression were associated with resolution of viremia and absence of BK nephropathy without acute rejection or graft loss.

Prophylaxis reduces cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, but is associated with increased costs and risks for side effects, viral resistance and late onset CMV disease. Preemptive therapy avoids drug costs but requires frequent monitoring and may not prevent complications of asymptomatic CMV replication. Kidney transplant recipients at risk for CMV (D+/R−, D+/R+, D−/R+) were randomized to prophylaxis (valganciclovir 900 mg q.d. for 100 days, n = 49) or preemptive therapy (900 mg b.i.d. for 21 days, n = 49) for CMV DNAemia (CMV DNA level >2000 copies/mL in ≥ 1 whole blood specimens by quantitative PCR) assessed weekly for 16 weeks and at 5, 6, 9 and 12 months. More patients in the preemptive group, 29 (59%) than in the prophylaxis group, 14 (29%) developed CMV DNAemia, p = 0.004. Late onset of CMV DNAemia (>100 days after transplant) occurred in 11 (24%) randomized to prophylaxis, and none randomized to preemptive therapy. Symptomatic infection occurred in five patients, four (3 D+/R− and 1 D+/R+) in the prophylactic group and one (D+/R−) in the preemptive group. Peak CMV levels were highest in the D+/R− patients. Both strategies were effective in preventing symptomatic CMV. Overall costs were similar and insensitive to wide fluctuations in costs of either monitoring or drug.

In a previous study, we performed serial BK virus (BKV), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and detected active BKV infection in 70 (35.4%) of 198 renal transplant recipients. In the current study, pre-transplant donor and recipient samples were analyzed for BKV antibody titer and HLA alleles. Donor antibody titer was inversely proportional to onset of viruria, p < 0.001, directly proportional to duration of viruria, p = 0.014 and directly proportional to peak urine viral titer p = 0.005. Recipient pairs receiving kidneys from the same donor were concordant for BKV infection, p = 0.017, and had matched sequences of segments of the NCCR and VP1 genes that tended to vary among recipients of kidneys from different donors. We did not see an association of HLA A, B, or DR, HLA allele mismatches or total HLA mismatches and BK infection. However, all 11 recipients with sustained BK viremia received kidneys from donors lacking HLA C7, and 10 recipients also lacked C7. These findings derive from the largest and most comprehensive prospective study of BKV infection in renal transplant recipients performed to date. Our data support donor origin for early BKV infection in kidney transplant recipients, and suggest that a specific HLA C locus may be associated with failure to control BKV infection.

Nephropathy from BK virus (BKV) infection is an evolving challenge in kidney transplant recipients. It is the consequence of modern potent immunosuppression aimed at reducing acute rejection and improving allograft survival. Untreated BKV infections lead to kidney allograft dysfunction or loss. Decreased immunosuppression is the principle treatment but predisposes to acute and chronic rejection. Screening protocols for early detection and prevention of symptomatic BKV nephropathy have improved outcomes. Although no approved antiviral drug is available, leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, and intravenous Ig have been used. Retransplantation after BKV nephropathy has been successful.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: S36 -S46, 2007. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00920207 P olyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients is of increasing interest and research. Although the two human polyomaviruses, BK virus (BKV) and JC virus (JCV), were reported in 1971 (1,2), their influence and importance were limited. The emergence of polyomavirus nephropathy has coincided with the use of new potent immunosuppressive medications (3,4). It is usually associated with BKV, affects up to 8% of recipients, and frequently results in allograft loss or permanent dysfunction (5). It presents as an asymptomatic gradual rise in creatinine with a tubulointerstitial nephritis that mimics rejection, producing a treatment dilemma. The decrease in immunosuppression that is needed to treat infection is opposite to the increases that are needed to treat rejection.Two studies in kidney transplant recipients who were treated with prednisone and azathioprine in the early 1980s have provided the foundation for much of our current understanding of polyomaviruses in transplant recipients. Hogan et al. (6) and Gardner et al. (7) found that the pretransplantation seroprevalence was 80 to 88% for BKV and 54 to 55% for JCV. The posttransplantation rates of polyomavirus infection were 18 to 44% for BKV and 30 to 35% for JCV. Most polyomavirus infections were asymptomatic and occurred within the first 3 mo after transplantation. BKV infection was associated with a rising creatinine. More than 20 yr ago, Gardner et al. (7) warned, "The detection of polyomavirus infection is important as increased immunosuppression needs to be avoided to prevent possible complications."