Crystallography has advanced our understanding of G proteincoupled receptors, but low expression levels and instability in solution have limited structural insights to very few selected members of this large protein family. Using neurotensin receptor 1 (NTR1) as a proof of principle, we show that two directed evolution technologies that we recently developed have the potential to overcome these problems. We purified three neurotensin-bound NTR1 variants from Escherichia coli and determined their X-ray structures at up to 2.75 Å resolution using vapor diffusion crystallization experiments. A crystallized construct was pharmacologically characterized and exhibited ligand-dependent signaling, internalization, and wild-type-like agonist and antagonist affinities. Our structures are fully consistent with all biochemically defined ligand-contacting residues, and they represent an inactive NTR1 state at the cytosolic side. They exhibit significant differences to a previously determined NTR1 structure (Protein Data Bank ID code 4GRV) in the ligand-binding pocket and by the presence of the amphipathic helix 8. A comparison of helix 8 stability determinants between NTR1 and other crystallized G protein-coupled receptors suggests that the occupancy of the canonical position of the amphipathic helix is reduced to various extents in many receptors, and we have elucidated the sequence determinants for a stable helix 8. Our analysis also provides a structural rationale for the long-known effects of C-terminal palmitoylation reactions on G protein-coupled receptor signaling, receptor maturation, and desensitization. membrane proteins | protein stability | protein engineering | detergents N eurotensin is a 13-amino-acid peptide, which plays important roles in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, antinociception, and hypothermia and in lung cancer progression (1-4). It is expressed throughout the central nervous system and in the gut, where it binds to at least three different neurotensin receptors (NTRs). NTR1 and NTR2 are class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (5, 6), whereas NTR3 belongs to the sortilin family. Most of the effects of neurotensin are mediated through NTR1, where the peptide acts as an agonist, leading to GDP/GTP exchange within heterotrimeric G proteins and subsequently to the activation of phospholipase C and adenylyl cyclase, which produce second messengers in the cytosol (5, 7). Activated NTR1 is rapidly phosphorylated and internalizes by a β-arrestin-and clathrin-mediated process (8), which is crucial for desensitizing the receptor (9). Several lines of evidence suggest that internalization is also linked to G proteinindependent NTR1 signaling (10, 11). To improve our mechanistic understanding of NTR1 and to gain additional insight into GPCR features such as helix 8 (H8), we were interested in obtaining a structure of this receptor in a physiologically relevant state.To date, by far the most successful strategy for GPCR structure determination requires the replacement of the intracel...

The relaxin and insulin-like peptide 3 receptors, LGR7 and LGR8, respectively, are unique members of the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor (LGR) family, because they possess an N-terminal motif with homology to the low density lipoprotein class A (LDLa) modules. By characterizing several LGR7 and LGR8 splice variants, we have revealed that the LDLa module directs ligand-activated cAMP signaling. The LGR8-short variant encodes an LGR8 receptor lacking the LDLa module, whereas LGR7-truncate, LGR7-truncate-2, and LGR7-truncate-3 all encode truncated secreted proteins retaining the LGR7 LDLa module. LGR8-short and an engineered LGR7 variant missing its LDLa module, LGR7-short, bound to their respective ligands with high affinity but lost their ability to signal via stimulation of intracellular cAMP accumulation. Conversely, secreted LGR7-truncate protein with the LDLa module was able to block relaxin-induced LGR7 cAMP signaling and did so without compromising the ability of LGR7 to bind to relaxin or be expressed on the cell membrane. Although the LDLa module of LGR7 was N-glycosylated at position Asn-14, an LGR7 N14Q mutant retained relaxin binding affinity and cAMP signaling, implying that glycosylation is not essential for optimal LDLa function. Using real-time PCR, the expression of mouse LGR7-truncate was detected to be high in, and specific to, the uterus of pregnant mice. The differential expression and evolutionary conservation of LGR7-truncate further suggests that it may also play an important role in vivo. This study highlights the essential role of the LDLa module in LGR7 and LGR8 function and introduces a novel model of GPCR regulation.Relaxin was initially named for its ability to relax the pubic symphysis in pregnant guinea pigs at parturition (1). Since then relaxin has been found to be involved in many physiological processes, including cervical ripening (2-5), inhibition of myometrial contractions in some mammals (6 -8), uterine growth during pregnancy (9, 10), and nipple development for lactation (11-13). Most of the actions of relaxin are a direct result of its ability to stimulate the breakdown and remodeling of collagen fibers by inhibiting collagen type I and III synthesis and promoting matrix metalloproteinase expression and activation (14 -16). Most mammalian species have relaxin; however, due to a gene duplication event, humans possess two relaxin genes, encoding H1 relaxin and H2 relaxin, with H2 relaxin being the major stored and circulating form (reviewed in Ref. 17). In pig, mouse, rat, and human, the primary source of relaxin is the corpus luteum (reviewed in Ref. 18), highlighting that the most pronounced roles of relaxin occur during pregnancy.The relaxin receptor is a GPCR 3 most recently named the RXFP1 receptor (relaxin family peptide receptor 1) (19), however, in this report it will be referred to by its original name, leucine-rich repeat-containing GPCR 7 (LGR7) (20). LGR7 has been highly conserved in vertebrate species throughout evolution and is related...

Baker, Gordon et al. present the first international case series describing the neurodevelopmental disorder associated with Synaptotagmin 1 (SYT1) de novo missense mutations. Key features include movement abnormalities, severe intellectual disability, and hallmark EEG alterations. Expression of patients’ SYT1 mutations in mouse neurons disturbs presynaptic vesicle dynamics in a mutation-specific manner.

Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3), a member of the relaxin peptide family, is produced in testicular Leydig cells and ovarian thecal cells. Gene knock-out experiments have identified a key biological role in initiating testes descent during fetal development. Additionally, INSL3 has an important function in mediating male and female germ cell function. These actions are elicited via its recently identified receptor, LGR8, a member of the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor family. To identify the structural features that are responsible for the interaction of INSL3 with its receptor, its solution structure was determined by NMR spectroscopy together with in vitro assays of a series of B-chain alanine-substituted analogs. Synthetic human INSL3 was found to adopt a characteristic relaxin/insulin-like fold in solution but is a highly dynamic molecule. The four termini of this two-chain peptide are disordered, and additional conformational exchange is evident in the molecular core. Alanine-substituted analogs were used to identify the key residues of INSL3 that are responsible for the interaction with the ectodomain of LGR8. These include Arg B16 and Val B19 , with His B12 and Arg B20 playing a secondary role, as evident from the synergistic effect on the activity in double and triple mutants involving these residues. Together, these amino acids combine with the previously identified critical residue, Trp B27 , to form the receptor binding surface. The current results provide clear direction for the design of novel specific agonists and antagonists of this receptor. Insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3 4; also known as relaxin-like factor and Leydig cell insulin-like peptide) was originally discovered and isolated as a cDNA clone from a boar testis cDNA library (1). It is primarily produced by prenatal and postnatal mature Leydig cells of the testis and the thecal cells of the ovary. Its primary structure showed it to be a bona fide member of the insulin-insulin-like growth factor-relaxin superfamily, which is now known to have a total of ten members in the human. Like insulin, INSL3 is firstly synthesized as a pre-prohormone precursor containing a signal peptide linked to B-C-A domains. It undergoes processing by hitherto unidentified proprotein convertases, resulting in the production of mature INSL3 consisting of a A-B heterodimer that is covalently linked by two interchain disulfide bonds and one intrachain disulfide bond (Fig. 1) (2). These disulfide bonds are essential for maintaining its expected characteristic insulin-like conformation and its unique biological activities (3). The receptor for INSL3, LGR8, is a member of the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-proteincoupled receptor family (4). It is closely related to the relaxin receptor, LGR7, and has been recently classified as relaxin family peptide (RXFP) receptor, RXFP2 (5). Importantly, relaxin peptides from some species can also bind to and activate LGR8, albeit with a lower affinity than INSL3 (5).Male mice homozygous with targeted disrup...

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of pharmaceutical protein targets, yet drug development is encumbered by a lack of information about their molecular structure and conformational dynamics. Most mechanistic and structural studies as well as in vitro drug screening with purified receptors require detergent solubilization of the GPCR, but typically, these proteins exhibit only low stability in detergent micelles. We have developed the first directed evolution method that allows the direct selection of GPCRs stable in a chosen detergent from libraries containing over 100 million individual variants. The crucial concept was to encapsulate single Escherichia coli cells of a library, each expressing a different GPCR variant, to form detergent-resistant, semipermeable nano-containers. Unlike naked cells, these containers are not dissolved by detergents, allowing us to solubilize the GPCR proteins in situ while maintaining an association with the protein's genetic information, a prerequisite for directed evolution. The pore size was controlled to permit GPCR ligands to permeate but the solubilized receptor to remain within the nanocapsules. Fluorescently labeled ligands were used to bind to those GPCR variants inside the nano-containers that remained active in the detergent tested. With the use of fluorescence-activated cell sorting, detergent-stable mutants derived from two different family A GPCRs could be identified, some with the highest stability reported in short-chain detergents. In principle, this method (named cellular high-throughput encapsulation, solubilization and screening) is not limited to engineering stabilized GPCRs but could be used to stabilize other proteins for biochemical and structural studies.

H2 relaxin activates the relaxin family peptide receptor-1 (RXFP1), a class A G-protein coupled receptor, by a poorly understood mechanism. The ectodomain of RXFP1 comprises an N-terminal LDLa module, essential for activation, tethered to a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain by a 32-residue linker. H2 relaxin is hypothesized to bind with high affinity to the LRR domain enabling the LDLa module to bind and activate the transmembrane domain of RXFP1. Here we define a relaxin-binding site on the LDLa-LRR linker, essential for the high affinity of H2 relaxin for the ectodomain of RXFP1, and show that residues within the LDLa-LRR linker are critical for receptor activation. We propose H2 relaxin binds and stabilizes a helical conformation of the LDLa-LRR linker that positions residues of both the linker and the LDLa module to bind the transmembrane domain and activate RXFP1.

No abstract

Recent advances in thick tissue clearing are enabling high resolution, volumetric fluorescence imaging of complex cellular networks. Fluorescent proteins (FPs) such as GFP, however, can be inactivated by the denaturing chemicals used to remove lipids in some tissue clearing methods. Here, we solved the crystal structure of a recently engineered ultra-stable GFP (usGFP) and propose that the two stabilising mutations, Q69L and N164Y, act to improve hydrophobic packing in the core of the protein and facilitate hydrogen bonding networks at the surface, respectively. usGFP was found to dimerise strongly, which is not desirable for some applications. A point mutation at the dimer interface, F223D, generated monomeric usGFP (muGFP). Neurons in whole mouse brains were virally transduced with either EGFP or muGFP and subjected to Clear Lipid-exchanged Acrylamide-hybridized Rigid Imaging/Immunostaining/In situ hybridization-compatible Tissue-hYdrogel (CLARITY) clearing. muGFP fluorescence was retained after CLARITY whereas EGFP fluorescence was highly attenuated, thus demonstrating muGFP is a novel FP suitable for applications where high fluorescence stability and minimal self-association are required.