This article details the ESAFORM Benchmark 2021. The deep drawing cup of a 1 mm thick, AA 6016-T4 sheet with a strong cube texture was simulated by 11 teams relying on phenomenological or crystal plasticity approaches, using commercial or self-developed Finite Element (FE) codes, with solid, continuum or classical shell elements and different contact models. The material characterization (tensile tests, biaxial tensile tests, monotonic and reverse shear tests, EBSD measurements) and the cup forming steps were performed with care (redundancy of measurements). The Benchmark organizers identified some constitutive laws but each team could perform its own identification. The methodology to reach material data is systematically described as well as the final data set. The ability of the constitutive law and of the FE model to predict Lankford and yield stress in different directions is verified. Then, the simulation results such as the earing (number and average height and amplitude), the punch force evolution and thickness in the cup wall are evaluated and analysed. The CPU time, the manpower for each step as well as the required tests versus the final prediction accuracy of more than 20 FE simulations are commented. The article aims to guide students and engineers in their choice of a constitutive law (yield locus, hardening law or plasticity approach) and data set used in the identification, without neglecting the other FE features, such as software, explicit or implicit strategy, element type and contact model.

The increasing availability of data, which becomes a continually increasing trend in multiple fields of application, has given machine learning approaches a renewed interest in recent years. Accordingly, manufacturing processes and sheet metal forming follow such directions, having in mind the efficiency and control of the many parameters involved, in processing and material characterization. In this article, two applications are considered to explore the capability of machine learning modeling through shallow artificial neural networks (ANN). One consists of developing an ANN to identify the constitutive model parameters of a material using the force–displacement curves obtained with a standard bending test. The second one concentrates on the springback problem in sheet metal press-brake air bending, with the objective of predicting the punch displacement required to attain a desired bending angle, including additional information of the springback angle. The required data for designing the ANN solutions are collected from numerical simulation using finite element methodology (FEM), which in turn was validated by experiments.

No abstract

No abstract