To understand the impact of radiation feedback during the formation of a globular cluster (GC), we simulate a head-on collision of two turbulent giant molecular clouds (GMCs). A series of idealized radiation-hydrodynamic simulations is performed, with and without stellar radiation or Type II supernovae. We find that a gravitationally bound, compact star cluster of mass M
GC ∼ 105
M
⊙ forms within ≈3 Myr when two GMCs with mass M
GMC = 3.6 × 105
M
⊙ collide. The GC candidate does not form during a single collapsing event but emerges due to the mergers of local dense gas clumps and gas accretion. The momentum transfer due to the absorption of the ionizing radiation is the dominant feedback process that suppresses the gas collapse, and photoionization becomes efficient once a sufficient number of stars form. The cluster mass is larger by a factor of ∼2 when the radiation feedback is neglected, and the difference is slightly more pronounced (16%) when extreme Lyα feedback is considered in the fiducial run. In the simulations with radiation feedback, supernovae explode after the star-forming clouds are dispersed, and their metal ejecta are not instantaneously recycled to form stars.
A number of recent studies have claimed that the double red clump (RC) observed in the Milky Way bulge is a consequence of a giant X-shaped structure. In particular, Ness & Lang (2016) reported a direct detection of a faint X-shaped structure from the residual map of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE ) bulge image. Here we show, however, that their result is affected substantially by whether the conventional dust extinction correction is applied or not and partly by a bulge model subtracted from the original image. We find that the residuals obtained by subtracting either ellipsoidal or boxy bulge models from the dereddened images show no obvious X-shaped structure. We further show that, even if it is real, the stellar density in the claimed X-shaped structure is way too low to be observed as a strong double RC at l = 0 • .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.