No abstract

We present new sequential and parallel sorting algorithms that now represent the fastest known techniques for a wide range of input sizes, input distributions, data types, and machines. Somewhat surprisingly, part of the speed advantage is due to the additional feature of the algorithms to work in-place, i.e., they do not need a significant amount of space beyond the input array. Previously, the in-place feature often implied performance penalties. Our main algorithmic contribution is a blockwise approach to in-place data distribution that is provably cache-efficient. We also parallelize this approach taking dynamic load balancing and memory locality into account. Our new comparison-based algorithm In-place Parallel Super Scalar Samplesort ( IPS 4 o ) , combines this technique with branchless decision trees. By taking cases with many equal elements into account and by adapting the distribution degree dynamically, we obtain a highly robust algorithm that outperforms the best previous in-place parallel comparison-based sorting algorithms by almost a factor of three. That algorithm also outperforms the best comparison-based competitors regardless of whether we consider in-place or not in-place, parallel or sequential settings. Another surprising result is that IPS 4 o even outperforms the best (in-place or not in-place) integer sorting algorithms in a wide range of situations. In many of the remaining cases (often involving near-uniform input distributions, small keys, or a sequential setting), our new In-place Parallel Super Scalar Radix Sort ( IPS 2 Ra ) turns out to be the best algorithm. Claims to have the – in some sense – “best” sorting algorithm can be found in many papers which cannot all be true. Therefore, we base our conclusions on an extensive experimental study involving a large part of the cross product of 21 state-of-the-art sorting codes, 6 data types, 10 input distributions, 4 machines, 4 memory allocation strategies, and input sizes varying over 7 orders of magnitude. This confirms the claims made about the robust performance of our algorithms while revealing major performance problems in many competitors outside the concrete set of measurements reported in the associated publications. This is particularly true for integer sorting algorithms giving one reason to prefer comparison-based algorithms for robust general-purpose sorting.

No abstract

We present new sequential and parallel sorting algorithms that now represent the fastest known techniques for a wide range of input sizes, input distributions, data types, and machines. Somewhat surprisingly, part of the speed advantage is due to the additional feature of the algorithms to work in-place, i.e., they do not need a significant amount of space beyond the input array. Previously, the in-place feature often implied performance penalties. Our main algorithmic contribution is a blockwise approach to in-place data distribution that is provably cache-efficient. We also parallelize this approach taking dynamic load balancing and memory locality into account.Our new comparison-based algorithm In-place Superscalar Samplesort (IPS 4 o), combines this technique with branchless decision trees. By taking cases with many equal elements into account and by adapting the distribution degree dynamically, we obtain a highly robust algorithm that outperforms the best previous inplace parallel comparison-based sorting algorithms by almost a factor of three. That algorithm also outperforms the best comparison-based competitors regardless of whether we consider in-place or not in-place, parallel or sequential settings.Another surprising result is that IPS 4 o even outperforms the best (in-place or not in-place) integer sorting algorithms in a wide range of situations. In many of the remaining cases (often involving near-uniform input distributions, small keys, or a sequential setting), our new In-place Parallel Super Scalar Radix Sort (IPS 2 Ra) turns out to be the best algorithm.Claims to have the -in some sense -"best" sorting algorithm can be found in many papers which cannot all be true. Therefore, we base our conclusions on an extensive experimental study involving a large part of the cross product of 21 state-of-the-art sorting codes, 6 data types, 10 input distributions, 4 machines, 4 memory allocation strategies, and input sizes varying over 7 orders of magnitude. This confirms the claims made about the robust performance of our algorithms while revealing major performance problems in many competitors outside the concrete set of measurements reported in the associated publications. This is particularly true for integer sorting algorithms giving one reason to prefer comparison-based algorithms for robust general-purpose sorting.

Ordered (key-value) maps are an important and widely-used data type for large-scale data processing frameworks. Beyond simple search, insertion and deletion, more advanced operations such as range extraction, filtering, and bulk updates form a critical part of these frameworks. We describe an interface for ordered maps that is augmented to support fast range queries and sums, and introduce a parallel and concurrent library called PAM (Parallel Augmented Maps) that implements the interface. The interface includes a wide variety of functions on augmented maps ranging from basic insertion and deletion to more interesting functions such as union, intersection, filtering, extracting ranges, splitting, and range-sums. We describe algorithms for these functions that are efficient both in theory and practice. As examples of the use of the interface and the performance of PAM we apply the library to four applications: simple range sums, interval trees, 2D range trees, and ranked word index searching. The interface greatly simplifies the implementation of these data structures over direct implementations. Sequentially the code achieves performance that matches or exceeds existing libraries designed specially for a single application, and in parallel our implementation gets speedups ranging from 40 to 90 on 72 cores with 2-way hyperthreading.