Isolated urinary bladders of the bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) and the toad (B. marinus) were mounted in an Ussing chamber. Potential differences up to 114 mv were observed in bullfrog bladder when the mucosal surface was bathed in dilute Na 2 SO 4 and the serosal surface in sulfate Ringer's. In experiments with bullfrogs, K was used to replace Na in the mucosal solution and Na was used for K in the serosal solutions. The selectivity was judged in terms of the relative effectiveness of the replacement cation in maintaining the bladder potential. In experiments with toads, K and Rb were equally poor replacements for Na at the mucosal border, while Rb was a good replacement for K at the serosal border. Li in the mucosal solution appeared to depress the potential in part irreversibly. At the serosal border, Li was a partially effective substitute for K, more so than was Na. However, both were poor replacements compared to Rb. The mucosal surface of the urinary bladder of both frog and toad appears to be Na-selective and the serosal surface appears to be K-selective, consistent with the Koefoed-Johnsen-Ussing model for frog skin.
A B S T R A C T Exposure of the outside surface of isolated frog skin (R. pipiens and R. catesbeiana) to sulfate solution made up with D,O decreased skin potential and resistance. Exposure of the inside surface to D,O solution decreased the potential slightly but increased the resistance. The changes were linearly related to the D20 concentration. Since D,O acts like a hyperosmotic solution, the skin potential and resistance were studied upon exposure to solution made hyperosmotic by addition of sucrose, mannitol, acetamide, urea, thiourea, Na,SO,, or K~SO4. Skin potential and resistance decreased when the outside solution was made hyperosmotic. The changes depended upon the concentration and the nature of the solute. Thiourea and urea solutions were the most effective. Treatment of the inside surface gave relatively small decreases in potential; the resistance either increased or remained unchanged. These effects appeared to depend upon the direction of the osmotic gradient across the skin rather than upon the value of the osmolarity compared to normal body fluids. Experiments with a series of six polyhydric alcohols from methanol to mannitol and the polysaccharides, sucrose and raffmose, showed adonitol with 5 carbons to decrease the potential the most. Smaller and larger compounds of this set gave lesser effects. As yet no consistent explanation of the effects is forthcoming, but their demonstration calls for caution in the indiscriminate use of solutes such as mannitol or sucrose "to make up the osmolality" and in the neglect of urea because "it penetrates freely." I N T R O D U C T I O NIn 1939 T. C. Barnes (1) reported experiments in which he replaced the inside and outside solutions bathing frog skin with D~O Ringer's (chloride). He observed large decreases in potential. In our initial experiments with D~O effects on frog skin the magnitude of the depression depended upon which side of the skin was exposed to D20: outside exposure gave the largest depression, inside exposure gave the least depression, and simultaneous exposure 773
The composition of the solution bathing one border of the isolated frog skin affects the response of the potential across the skin to changes in the composition of the solution bathing the opposite border. Increasing the K concentration of the inside (corium) bathing solution decreased the sensitivity of the potential to a change in outside Na concentration. Decreasing the outside Na concentration decreased the sensitivity of the potential to a change in inside K concentration. Increasing the total ionic strength of the outside bathing solution or of both bathing solutions decreased the sensitivity of the potential to a change in outside Na concentration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.