No abstract

This study evaluated the effects of 4 different weekly stretching protocols on the rate of gain and decline in hamstring flexibility over an 8-week period, across sex. Using a randomized single-blind design, 53 healthy subjects aged 18-46 years were assigned to 1 of 4 stretching protocols or a control group. The stretching protocols consisted of either daily or 3 times per week stretching and performed once or twice each day. These protocols differed in terms of frequency and total weekly stretching time. All the subjects stretched their hamstring muscles for 4 weeks and were measured weekly for their hip range of motion (ROM). Stretching ceased the final 4 weeks as the weekly measurements continued. The results revealed no significant differences in the rate of gain or the rate of loss between the different stretching protocols (2-way analysis of variance, F = 2.60, p > 0.05). All the stretching groups gained in hip ROM from pre to week 4 (F = 269.24, p < 0.001). After cessation, the rate of loss was similar for all the 4 stretching groups (F = 102.86, p < 0.001); all the groups retained significant gains at the end of the study (p < 0.001). The control group did not change over time. Those who stretched at least 6 times per week gained more than those who stretched 3 times per week (24 and 16.8%, respectively, F = 5.20, p < 0.05). Subject sex did not influence ROM changes (p > 0.05). Stretching appears to be equally effective, whether performed daily or 3 times per week, provided individuals stretch at least 2 times each day. Moreover, although women are more flexible than men are, there was no sex difference in terms of stretching response.

Wearing a wrist extension orthosis appears to place additional stress on the proximal joint musculature beyond that found without splint use. The study has implications for the prescription of wrist extension orthoses, especially for patients whose proximal joints are already compromised.

recent vears, the predominant philosophv of physical therapists and athletic trainers in treating lower extremity injuries has focused on the use of closed kinetic chain exercises. This is based on both observational and experimental data that suggest such exercises are more effective, safer, and more functional than previouslv emploved open kinetic chain exercises (3,8,9,12,20,23,29,30,37,58,41). M'hile a variety of techniques are typically used to create a closed kinetic chain environment, one that has evoked particular interest is backward walking (19,24,25). The functionality of both backward and forward walking in rehabilitation is quite obvious. However, it has been suggested that backward walking mav off'er some benefits beyond those experienced through forward walking alone. Gray reported his observation that backward walking appeared to create "more muscle activity in proportion to effort" than forward walking (24). This observation is supported by research demonstrating that the energy cost of backward walking is greater than that of forward walking ( 1 ) . Both Vilenskv et al (48) and Kramer and Reid (27) concluded that backward walking was different from forward walking. Thev reported that backward walking was associated with increased cadence and decreased stride length when compared with forward walking. These authors also observed that thejoint kinematics involved in backward walking were substantially different from those of forward walking (27.48). In contrast, however, Winter and Pluck (51) concluded that backward walking was a near mirror image of forward walking. Thev reported that, in order to produce the muscle activation patterns involved in forward walking, the

It is theorized that the total stretch time in a day is more important than the actual single stretch duration time. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 stretching protocols, keeping total stretching time equivalent. The 2 protocols were a 10-second duration stretch and a 30-second duration stretch. Although the stretch durations differed, the total stretching time over the course of a day was held constant at 2 minutes for both protocols. Participants were randomly assigned a protocol to each of their legs: subjects stretched 1 leg with the 10-second protocol and the opposite leg with the 30-second protocol. The 10-second stretch was repeated 6 times for a total of 1 minute; the 30-second protocol was repeated 2 times for a total of 1 minute. Stretching was performed twice daily (a total of 2 minutes each day) for 6 weeks. All stretching was performed to the hamstring muscles. Hip flexion measurements were recorded at pretest, 3-weeks, and 6-weeks. Subjects demonstrated significant gains in range of motion for hip flexion over the course of 6 weeks, p = 0.000. No differences existed between the 2 protocols. Range of motion gains were equal between the 2 stretching protocols. The common denominator was total stretch time for a day. Regardless of the duration of a single stretch, the key to improvement was the total daily stretch time. These findings are important as they allow clinicians and individuals to customize stretching protocols to meet individual needs.

he sport of triathlon has existed for nearly two decades and the volume of literature related to this multisport challenge of endurance has grown tremendously in this period of time. According to Fiapatrick, triathlon first began in 1978 "as a race between athletes of three separate disciplines-swim, bike, run-to determine who was the fittestw (11). Since that first race, athletes from around the world have taken on the challenge of the multidimensional race known as the triathlon. With this growth in interest has emerged a new breed of athletic injuries. Many of these injuries resemble the traditional injuries associated with each particular sport represented (swimming, cycling, or running).However, the triathlete is also prone to injuries related to the cumulative effect of multisport training. For example, the Achilles tendon may be at a greater risk of tendinitis to the runner when the combination of swimming and cycling are added to the training program. With swimming, the feet are maintained in a plantar flexed position for a more streamlined position. This plantar flexed foot position may promote tightness of the gastrocnemius and soleus, especially as a cumulative effect of swim training. Cycling requires a continual effort from the gastrocsoleus muscle group to generate power during pedaling. The cumulative effects of cycling and swim training could contribute to tight, fatigued posterior calf muscles, which

Stretching is performed in rehabilitation and sports conditioning programs. It is not known how often during a week stretching needs to be performed to maintain flexibility. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of intermittent stretching (i.e., 2-3 days/week) on hip range of motion (ROM) following a 4-week, daily stretching program. This study used a randomized, single-blind, test-retest design. Healthy adult subjects, age 18 to 50 years, were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 static stretching protocols: (a) standard protocol or (b) intermittent protocol. All subjects stretched their hamstrings daily for the first 4 weeks. The standard group discontinued all stretching after 4 weeks. The intermittent group continued to stretch 2 to 3 days per week for an additional 4 weeks. All subjects were measured for hip ROM weekly for the full 8 weeks. Thirty-two subjects completed the study (standard group = 14; intermittent group = 18, mean age 24.6 years). Mean hip ROM increased (p < 0.05) for both groups from before protocol (PRE) to Week 4 (standard group gain from 71.4 +/- 18.5 degrees to 90.6 +/- 20.5 degrees and intermittent group gain from 68.6 +/- 15.7 degrees to 89.1 +/- 16.8 degrees). During the final 4 weeks, mean hip ROM decreased (p < 0.05) for the standard group from 90.6 +/- 20.5 degrees to 83.9 +/- 20.3 degrees. Mean hip ROM for the intermittent group did not decrease during the final 4 weeks of the study (89.1 +/- 16.8 degrees to 93.2 +/- 14.9 degrees, p > 0.05). Intermittent stretching (i.e., 2 or 3 days/week) is sufficient to maintain ROM gains acquired from a prior static stretching program. Clinicians and trainers may educate their clients of the benefits of intermittent stretching to maintain flexibility.

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate whether frontal plane (FP) plyometrics, which are defined as plyometrics dominated with a lateral component, would produce similar increases in vertical jump height (VJH) compared to sagittal plane (SP) Plyometrics. Thirty-two junior varsity and varsity high-school basketball players participated in 6 weeks of plyometric training. Players participated in either FP or SP plyometrics for the entire study. Vertical jump height was measured on 3 occasions: preintervention (baseline), at week 3 of preparatory training, and at week 6 of training. Descriptive statistics were calculated for VJH. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to test the difference in mean vertical jump scores using FP and SP training modalities. Results showed a significant effect over time for vertical jump (p < 0.001). Moreover, a significant time by protocol interaction was noted (p < 0.032). A 1-way ANOVA demonstrated that only the SP group demonstrated improvements over time, in VJH, p < 0.05. The FP group did not improve statistically. The data from this study suggest that FP plyometric training did not have a significant effect on VJH and significant improvement in VJH was seen in subjects participating in SP plyometrics thus reinforcing the specificity principle of training. However, coaches should implement both types of plyometrics because both training modalities can improve power and quickness among basketball players.