No abstract

Purpose The current COVID-19 pandemic is transforming our urologic practice and most urologic societies recommend to defer any surgical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. It is unclear whether a delay between diagnosis and surgical management (i.e., surgical delay) may have a detrimental effect on oncologic outcomes of PCa patients. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of surgical delay on oncologic outcomes. Methods Data of 926 men undergoing radical prostatectomy across Europe for intermediate and high-risk PCa according to EAU classification were identified. Multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model tested association between surgical delay and upgrading on final pathology, lymph-node invasion (LNI), pathological locally advanced disease (pT3-4 and/or pN1), need for adjuvant therapy, and biochemical recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate BCR-free survival after surgery as a function of surgical delay using a 3 month cutoff. Results Median follow-up and surgical delay were 26 months (IQR 10-40) and 3 months (IQR 2-5), respectively. We did not find any significant association between surgical delay and oncologic outcomes when adjusted to pre-and post-operative variables. The lack of such association was observed across EAU risk categories. Conclusion Delay of several months did not appear to adversely impact oncologic results for intermediate and high-risk PCa, and support an attitude of deferring surgery in line with the current recommendation of urologic societies.

No abstract

No abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Limitations in tumor staging and the heterogeneous natural evolution of pT1 urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) make the choice of treatment challenging. We evaluated if histopathological substaging (pT1a, pT1b, and pT1c) helps predict disease recurrence, progression, and overall survival following transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included 239 consecutive patients diagnosed with pT1 UBC at TURB in a single institution since 2001. Each sample was interpreted by our specialized uropathologists trained to subclassify pT1 stage. Three groups were distinguished according to the degree of invasion: T1a (up to the muscularis mucosae [MM]), T1b (into the MM), and T1c (beyond the MM). <b><i>Results:</i></b> T1 substaging was possible in 217/239 (90%) patients. pT1a, b, and c occurred in 124 (57), 59 (27), and 34 (16%), respectively. The median follow-up was 3.1 years, with a cumulative recurrence rate of 52%, progression rate of 20%, and survival rate of 54%. Recurrence was not significantly associated with tumor substage (<i>p</i> = 0.61). However, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly higher progression rate among T1b (31) and T1c (26%) tumors than T1a (13%) (log-rank test: <i>p</i> = 0.001) stages. In a multivariable model including gender, age, ASA score, smoking, tumor grade, and presence of carcinoma in situ, T1 substage was the single variable significantly associated with progression-free survival (HR 1.7, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Nineteen patients (9%) needed radical cystectomy; among them, 12/19 (63%) had an invasive tumor. Overall survival was significantly associated with tumor substaging (<i>p</i> = 0.001). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Histopathological substaging of pT1 UBC is significantly associated with tumor progression and overall survival and therefore appears to be a useful prognostic tool to counsel patients about treatment options.

No abstract

Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistulae of the renal artery are rare complications of kidney trauma. They commonly result from open traumas and occur within days after the injury. Common symptoms include acute haematuria, pain, or hypertension. We report the case of a fifty-three-year-old man presenting with symptomatic complex chronic high flow kidney arteriovenous fistula with interposition of a pseudoaneurysmal pouch and arterial aneurysmal dilatation in a solitary left kidney 38 years after a blunt trauma. Those conditions were successfully treated by endovascular embolization followed by regular radiologic, biological, and clinical follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, few similar cases were reported more than 20 years after trauma. However, no case combining an arteriovenous fistula and a pseudoaneurysm revealing as late as 38 years after trauma was found. In addition, management of those conditions on a solitary kidney and outcomes has not been described. We believe that our case depicts the clinical presentation and management of this rare entity that should not be unrecognized due to its potential lethal implications.

This clinical case-based discussion focuses on a 73-yr-old man diagnosed with intermediate-risk oligometastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and treated with systemic therapy. Current guideline-based treatment options are presented and critically examined. The discussion covers the main aspects of the management of metastatic RCC, such as the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasisdirected therapies, as well as the multiple options for systemic targeted and immune therapies. An insight into developments that may play a role in treatment pathways in the future according to the latest scientific advances is also provided. Patient summary: A number of treatment options are available for patients who have metastatic disease when diagnosed with clear-cell kidney cancer. Starting from a clinical case, the current standard of care and future perspectives regarding treatment of this disease are presented.