Precise apposition of presynaptic and postsynaptic domains is a fundamental property of all neuronal circuits. Experiments in vitro suggest that Neuroligins and Neurexins function as key regulatory proteins in this process. In a genetic screen, we recovered several mutant alleles of Drosophila neuroligin 1 (dnlg1) that cause a severe reduction in bouton numbers at neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). In accord with reduced synapse numbers, these NMJs show reduced synaptic transmission. Moreover, lack of postsynaptic DNlg1 leads to deficits in the accumulation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors, scaffold proteins, and subsynaptic membranes, while increased DNlg1 triggers ectopic postsynaptic differentiation via its cytoplasmic domain. DNlg1 forms discrete clusters adjacent to postsynaptic densities. Formation of these clusters depends on presynaptic Drosophila Neurexin (DNrx). However, DNrx binding is not an absolute requirement for DNlg1 function. Instead, other signaling components are likely involved in DNlg1 transsynaptic functions, with essential interactions organized by the DNlg1 extracellular domain but also by the cytoplasmic domain.

Understanding the process of synapse assembly in molecular and cell-biological detail is a prerequisite for understanding neural circuit development and activity-mediated remodeling, and thus is important for unraveling learning and memory processes (structural plasticity) [1][2][3] . Functional chemical synapses are characterized by two apposed compartments that must be coestablished with high spatiotemporal precision: the presynaptic active zone, where regulated and rapid fusion of neurotransmitter-filled synaptic vesicles takes place, and the postsynaptic density (PSD), which embeds neurotransmitter receptors.Glutamatergic neuromuscular junction (NMJ) terminals of Drosophila larvae grow to meet the requirements of the growing muscle fibers, a process in which new synapses are continuously added 4 (where a synapse is defined as a single active zone opposed by a single PSD 1 ). In vivo imaging has shown that presynaptic Syd-1 and Liprin-α clusters initiate active zone formation 5 . On the postsynaptic side, initial PSD growth depends on incorporation of a glutamate receptor (GluR) containing the GluRIIA subunit. Later PSD maturation is marked by the incorporation of GluRIIB-containing receptor complexes 6 . Synapse assembly is concluded at presynaptic active zones by the incorporation of the active zone scaffold component Bruchpilot (BRP) 5 .Coordinating synapse assembly requires signaling across the synaptic cleft, which separates pre-from postsynaptic membranes. Transsynaptic cell adhesion molecules are obvious candidates for coupling active zone and PSD assembly. In vitro, the Neurexin-Neuroligin (Nrx-Nlg) complex can mediate the trans-synaptic signaling required for synapse assembly 7,8 . How this signaling axis integrates with the additional assembly machinery, however, has remained largely unclear.Here, we provide evidence of a dual role for Syd-1 in early assembly of NMJ synapses. It retains Liprin-α clusters at active zones and is important for clustering of presynaptic Nrx-1, likely through a direct and PDZ-domain-dependent interaction. Consequently, Syd-1 is also needed for clustering of postsynaptic Nlg1, which organizes postsynaptic assembly. Coincident action of Syd-1 with Nrx-1-Nlg1 appears to allow active zone scaffolds to pass through an initial, still fragile assembly phase. We suggest that binding between Syd-1 and Nrx-1-Nlg1 is a means to coordinate pre-with postsynaptic assembly. Our study shows an example of how coincident action of a presynaptic active zone scaffold protein and a trans-synaptic cell adhesion protein module can spatiotemporally orchestrate synapse assembly. RESULTSInitially described in cell culture systems (for a review, see ref. 9), interaction between mammalian presynaptic Nrx proteins and postsynaptic Nlg molecules was proposed to be important for proper synapse assembly. However, genetic ablation of three Nlg (Nlgn) genes in mice 10 does not result in a substantial structural phenotype, potentially reflecting a strong capacity for compensatory processes in vivo.Nonethe...

During development of the Drosophila nervous system, migrating motor axons contact and interact with different cell types before reaching their peripheral muscle fields. The axonal attractant Sidestep (Side) is expressed in most of these intermediate targets. Here, we show that motor axons recognize and follow Side-expressing cell surfaces from the ventral nerve cord to their target region. Contact of motor axons with Side-expressing cells induces the down-regulation of Side. In the absence of Side, the interaction with intermediate targets is lost. Misexpression of Side in side mutants strongly attracts motor axons to ectopic sites. We provide evidence that, on motor axons, Beaten path Ia (Beat) functions as a receptor or part of a receptor complex for Side. In beat mutants, motor axons no longer recognize Side-expressing cell surfaces. Furthermore, Beat interacts with Side both genetically and biochemically. These results suggest that the tracing of Side-labeled cell surfaces by Beat-expressing growth cones is a major principle of motor axon guidance in Drosophila.[Keywords: Drosophila; motor axon guidance; Sidestep; Beaten path; substrate pathway; in vivo imaging; time-lapse movie] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.

Dynamic actin polymerization drives a variety of morphogenetic events during metazoan development. Members of the WASP/WAVE protein family are central nucleation-promoting factors. They are embedded within regulatory networks of macromolecular complexes controlling Arp2/3-mediated actin nucleation in time and space. WAVE (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family verprolin-homologous protein) proteins are found in a conserved pentameric heterocomplex that contains Abi, Kette/Nap1, Sra-1/CYFIP, and HSPC300. Formation of the WAVE complex contributes to the localization, activity, and stability of the various WAVE proteins. Here, we established the Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) technique in Drosophila to determine the subcellular localization of the WAVE complex in living flies. Using different split-YFP combinations, we are able to visualize the formation of the WAVE-Abi complex in vivo. We found that WAVE also forms dimers that are capable of forming higher order clusters with endogenous WAVE complex components. The N-terminal WAVE homology domain (WHD) of the WAVE protein mediates both WAVE-Abi and WAVE-WAVE interactions. Detailed localization analyses show that formation of WAVE complexes specifically takes place at basal cell compartments promoting actin polymerization. In the wing epithelium, hetero-and homooligomeric WAVE complexes co-localize with Integrin and Talin suggesting a role in integrin-mediated cell adhesion. RNAi mediated suppression of single components of the WAVE and the Arp2/3 complex in the wing further suggests that WAVE-dependent Arp2/3-mediated actin nucleation is important for the maintenance of stable integrin junctions.Many biological processes are controlled by networks of interacting proteins organized in macromolecular complexes. Members of the WASP/WAVE 2 protein family are found to be part of such macromolecular complexes coordinating Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization in time and space (1). Purification of these multiprotein complexes and studies of the underlying protein interactions in vitro have led to significant advances in our understanding of how these molecular machines control actin nucleation. WAVE proteins are found in a pentameric heterocomplex that contains Abi, Kette/ Nap1, Sra-1/CYFIP, and HSPC300 (2). The interactions within the complex are mediated by direct protein-protein interactions (3-6). The central subunit of the WAVE complex represents the Abelson interactor Abi, which directly binds WAVE, HSPC300, and Kette/Nap1 through different domains. Sra-1 is a peripheral subunit recruited by Kette/ Nap1 and links the complex to Rac1 signaling. The WAVE complex is essential for the localization, activity, and stability of the various WAVE proteins (5, 7-11).However, purification and reconstitution experiments are based on the removal of the interacting proteins from their endogenous cellular context. To visualize WAVE complex formation in living flies we established the bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) technique in Drosophila. The Bi...