American football is a collision sport played by athletes at high speeds. Despite the padding and conditioning in these athletes, the shoulder is a vulnerable joint, and injuries to the shoulder girdle are common at all levels of competitive football. Some of the most common injuries in these athletes include anterior and posterior glenohumeral instability, acromioclavicular pathology (including separation, osteolysis, and osteoarthritis), rotator cuff pathology (including contusions, partial thickness, and full thickness tears), and pectoralis major and minor tears. In this article, we will review the epidemiology and clinical and radiographic workup of these injuries. We also will evaluate the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical management specifically related to high school, collegiate, and professional football athletes.
Background: Pectoralis major (PM) injuries are rare, primarily occurring in males during athletic activity. In the current literature, these injuries have not been well described in National Football League (NFL) athletes. Hypothesis: The incidence of PM injuries will be low in NFL athletes, with athletes missing significantly more time after injuries requiring operative management. Study Design: Cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Methods: All documented PM injuries were retrospectively analyzed using the NFL Injury Surveillance System over a 15-season period. The data were analyzed by season, session, position, activity, and contact type at the time of injury. Additionally, the incidence, treatment, and days missed as a result of injury were assessed. Results: Over 15 consecutive seasons, there were a total of 211 PM injuries. Of these injuries, 132 were classified as strains and 79 as ruptures. The incidence of strains was 0.41 per 10,000 athlete-exposures, compared with 0.25 per 10,0000 athlete-exposures for ruptures ( P < 0.01). Players with PM ruptures treated operatively missed significantly more days than players treated nonoperatively (146.7 ± 55.0 vs 77.2 ± 72.9; P < 0.01). Conclusion: NFL athletes miss significantly more time after operative compared with nonoperative management of PM ruptures. Clinical Relevance: PM injuries are rare, with the current literature lacking description of these injuries in NFL athletes. The paucity of data limits physicians from providing adequate counseling and expectations for athletes with this injury. This research represents the largest study assessing PM injuries in NFL athletes.
Background: Thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are common in competitive athletes. These tears often occur as a result of a radially directed force on an extended thumb. To date, no literature exists on the use of suture tape augmentation for repair of the thumb UCL in a competitive athlete cohort. Hypothesis: Using suture tape augmentation for the thumb UCL will allow for a safe and expedient return to play in competitive athletes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed to identify all patients who underwent operative primary thumb UCL repair between 2014 and 2018. All procedures were performed at a single institution by the senior author. Inclusion criteria were acute complete tears of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint UCL, treated with primary repair via suture tape augmentation in competitive high school, collegiate, or professional athletes. Exclusion criteria included recreational athletes, patients who underwent reconstruction (rather than repair), and patients with insufficient follow-up to establish return to play. Charts of patients identified through the retrospective review were further evaluated to determine patient- and injury-related variables. Return to play was defined as return to game competition and stratified as to whether this was at the same level of competition or any level of competition. Results: A total of 18 thumbs in 17 competitive high school, collegiate, and professional athletes were included in this study. One of the professional basketball players sustained injury to both thumbs approximately 10 months apart. The study group comprised 4 collegiate baseball players, 6 professional baseball players, 3 professional basketball players, 1 professional hockey player, 1 amateur-level hockey player, 1 high school basketball player, and 1 high school volleyball player. Mean follow-up was 27.9 months, and no complications were noted. Athletes who sustained an in-season injury (n = 13; 72.2%) returned to play at any level at a mean ± SD of 30.9 ± 10.1 days and at the same level at 36.3 ± 11.2 days. Athletes who sustained an out-of-season injury (n = 5; 27.8%) returned to play at any level at 101.4 ± 86.6 days and at the same level at 114.6 ± 87.0 days. Conclusion: The findings presented here offer evidence for return to play in competitive high school, collegiate, and professional athletes with a thumb UCL tear treated with repair and suture tape augmentation. All athletes returned to the same level of play. Those attempting to return in-season returned to the same level of play at a mean of just under 5 weeks. Augmenting the repair with anchored suture may prevent prolonged immobilization, expedite thumb motion, and improve postoperative recovery.
This study suggests that athletes with preexisting cervical spine pathology were less likely to be drafted than controls. Players with preexisting cervical spine pathology demonstrated a shorter career than those without; however, statistically based performance and numbers of games started were not different. Players with cervical spinal stenosis and those with a history of previous surgery demonstrated no difference in performance-based outcomes and no reports of neurological injury during their careers.
In this comprehensive analysis of SLAP tears in elite football players, it is clear that these injuries have the potential to cause significant detriment to an athlete's career.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.