downstream of the source element, in a process called 3′ transduction 7-9. L1 retrotransposons can also promote the somatic transmobilization of Alu elements, SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) elements and processed pseudogenes, which are copies of mRNAs that have been reverse transcribed into DNA and inserted into the genome with the machinery of active L1 elements 10-12. Approximately 50% of human tumors contain somatic retrotranspositions of L1 elements 7,13-15. Previous analyses indicate that although a fraction of somatically acquired L1 insertions in cancer may influence gene function, the majority of retrotransposon integrations in a single tumor represent passenger mutations with little or no effect on cancer development 7,13. Nonetheless, L1 elements are capable of promoting other types of genomic structural alterations in the germline and somatically, in addition to canonical L1 insertion events 16-18 ; the effect of these alterations remains largely unexplored in the context of human cancer 19,20 .

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a disease of the outer retina, characterized most significantly by atrophy of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium accompanied with or without choroidal neovascularization. Development of AMD has been recognized as contingent on environmental and genetic risk factors, the strongest being advanced age. In this review, we highlight pathogenic changes that destabilize ocular homeostasis and promote AMD development. With normal aging, photoreceptors are steadily lost, Bruch's membrane thickens, the choroid thins, and hard drusen may form in the periphery. In AMD, many of these changes are exacerbated in addition to the development of disease-specific factors such as soft macular drusen. Para-inflammation, which can be thought of as an intermediate between basal and robust levels of inflammation, develops within the retina in an attempt to maintain ocular homeostasis, reflected by increased expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 coupled with shifts in macrophage plasticity from the pro-inflammatory M1 to the anti-inflammatory M2 polarization. In AMD, imbalances in the M1 and M2 populations together with activation of retinal microglia are observed and potentially contribute to tissue degeneration. Nonetheless, the retina persists in a state of chronic inflammation and increased expression of certain cytokines and inflammasomes is observed. Since not everyone develops AMD, the vital question to ask is how the body establishes a balance between normal age-related changes and the pathological phenotypes in AMD.

Transposable elements (TEs) are interspersed repeat sequences that make up much of the human genome. Their expression has been implicated in development and disease. However, TE-derived RNA-seq reads are difficult to quantify. Past approaches have excluded these reads or aggregated RNA expression to subfamilies shared by similar TE copies, sacrificing quantitative accuracy or the genomic context necessary to understand the basis of TE transcription. As a result, the effects of TEs on gene expression and associated phenotypes are not well understood. Here, we present Software for Quantifying Interspersed Repeat Expression (SQuIRE), the first RNA-seq analysis pipeline that provides a quantitative and locus-specific picture of TE expression (https://github.com/wyang17/SQuIRE). SQuIRE is an accurate and user-friendly tool that can be used for a variety of species. We applied SQuIRE to RNA-seq from normal mouse tissues and a Drosophila model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In both model organisms, we recapitulated previously reported TE subfamily expression levels and revealed locus-specific TE expression. We also identified differences in TE transcription patterns relating to transcript type, gene expression and RNA splicing that would be lost with other approaches using subfamily-level analyses. Altogether, our findings illustrate the importance of studying TE transcription with locus-level resolution.

LINE-1 retrotransposons are overexpressed in more than half of human cancers. We identified a colorectal cancer wherein a fast-growing tumor subclone downregulated LINE-1, prompting us to examine how LINE-1 expression affects cell growth. We find that non-transformed cells undergo a TP53 -dependent growth arrest and activate interferon signaling in response to LINE-1. TP53 inhibition allows LINE-1(+) cells to grow, and genome wide knockout screens show that these cells require replication-coupled DNA repair pathways, replication stress signaling, and replication fork restart factors. Our findings demonstrate that LINE-1 expression creates specific molecular vulnerabilities and reveal a retrotransposition-replication conflict that may be an important determinant of cancer growth.

Interspersed repeat sequences comprise much of our DNA, although their functional effects are poorly understood. The most commonly occurring repeat is the Alu short interspersed element. New Alu insertions occur in human populations, and have been responsible for several instances of genetic disease. In this study, we sought to determine if there are instances of polymorphic Alu insertion variants that function in a common variant, common disease paradigm. We cataloged 809 polymorphic Alu elements mapping to 1,159 loci implicated in disease risk by genome-wide association study (GWAS) (P < 10−8). We found that Alu insertion variants occur disproportionately at GWAS loci (P = 0.013). Moreover, we identified 44 of these Alu elements in linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.7) with the trait-associated SNP. This figure represents a >20-fold increase in the number of polymorphic Alu elements associated with human phenotypes. This work provides a broader perspective on how structural variants in repetitive DNAs may contribute to human disease.

Background A large portion of intronic and intergenic space in our genome consists of repeated sequences. One of the most prevalent is the Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1, L1) mobile DNA. LINE-1 is rightly receiving increasing interest as a cancer biomarker. Content Intact LINE-1 elements are self-propagating. They code for RNA and proteins which function to make more copies of the genomic element. Our current understanding is that this process is repressed in most normal cells, but that LINE-1 expression is a hallmark of many types of malignancy. Here, we will consider features of cancer cells when cellular defense mechanisms repressing LINE-1 go awry. We will review evidence that genomic LINE-1 methylation, LINE-1-encoded RNAs, and LINE-1 open reading frame 1 protein (ORF1p) may be useful in cancer diagnosis. Summary The repetitive and variable nature of LINE-1 DNA sequences pose unique challenges to studying them, but recent advances in reagents and next generation sequencing present opportunities to characterize LINE-1 expression and activity in cancers, and identify clinical applications.

About half of all cancers have somatic integrations of retrotransposons. To characterize their role in oncogenesis, we analyzed the patterns and mechanisms of somatic retrotransposition in 2,954 cancer genomes from 37 histological cancer subtypes. We identified 19,166 somatically acquired retrotransposition events, affecting 35% of samples, and spanning a range of event types. L1 insertions emerged as the first most frequent type of somatic structural variation in esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the second most frequent in head-and-neck and colorectal cancers. Aberrant L1 integrations can delete megabase-scale regions of a chromosome, sometimes removing tumour suppressor genes, as well as inducing complex translocations and large-scale duplications. Somatic retrotranspositions can also initiate breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, leading to high-level amplification of oncogenes. These observations illuminate a relevant role of L1 retrotransposition in remodeling the cancer genome, with potential implications in the development of human tumours.Long interspersed nuclear element (LINE)-1 (L1) retrotransposons are widespread repetitive elements in the human genome, representing 17% of the entire DNA content 1,2 . Using a combination of cellular enzymes and self-encoded proteins with endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activity, L1 elements copy and insert themselves at new genomic sites, a process called retrotransposition. Most of the ~500,000 L1 copies in the human reference genome are truncated, inactive elements not able to retrotranspose. A small subset of them, maybe 100-150 L1 loci, remain active in the average human genome, acting as source elements, of which a small number are highly active copies termed hot-L1s 3-5 . These L1 source elements are usually transcriptionally repressed, but epigenetic changes occurring in tumours may promote their expression and allow them to retrotranspose 6,7 . Somatic L1 retrotransposition most often introduces a new copy of the 3' end of the L1 sequence, and can also mobilize unique DNA sequences located immediately downstream of the source element, a process called 3' transduction 7-9 . L1 retrotransposons can also promote the somatic trans-mobilization of Alu, SVA and processed pseudogenes, which are copies of messenger RNAs that have been reverse transcribed into DNA and inserted into the genome using the machinery of active L1 elements 10-12 .6 Approximately 50% of human tumours have somatic retrotransposition of L1 elements 7,13-15 .Previous analyses indicate that although a fraction of somatically acquired L1 insertions in cancer may influence gene function, the majority of retrotransposon integrations in a single tumour represent passenger mutations with little or no effect on cancer development 7,13 .Nonetheless, L1 insertions are capable of promoting other types of genomic structural alterations in the germline and somatically, apart from canonical L1 insertion events [16][17][18] , which remain largely unexplored in human cancer 19,20 .To further understand the roles...

BackgroundLong interspersed element-1 (LINE-1, L1) is the major driver of mobile DNA activity in modern humans. When expressed, LINE-1 loci produce bicistronic transcripts encoding two proteins essential for retrotransposition, ORF1p and ORF2p. Many types of human cancers are characterized by L1 promoter hypomethylation, L1 transcription, L1 ORF1p protein expression, and somatic L1 retrotransposition. ORF2p encodes the endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities required for L1 retrotransposition. Its expression is poorly characterized in human tissues and cell lines.ResultsWe report mass spectrometry-based tumor proteome profiling studies wherein ORF2p eludes detection. To test whether ORF2p could be detected with specific reagents, we developed and validated five rabbit monoclonal antibodies with immunoreactivity for specific epitopes on the protein. These reagents readily detect ectopic ORF2p expressed from bicistronic L1 constructs. However, endogenous ORF2p is not detected in human tumor samples or cell lines by western blot, immunoprecipitation, or immunohistochemistry despite high levels of ORF1p expression. Moreover, we report endogenous ORF1p-associated interactomes, affinity isolated from colorectal cancers, wherein we similarly fail to detect ORF2p. These samples include primary tumors harboring hundreds of somatically acquired L1 insertions. The new data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD013743.ConclusionsAlthough somatic retrotransposition provides unequivocal genetic evidence for the expression of ORF2p in human cancers, we are unable to directly measure its presence using several standard methods. Experimental systems have previously indicated an unequal stoichiometry between ORF1p and ORF2p, but in vivo, the expression of these two proteins may be more strikingly uncoupled. These findings are consistent with observations that ORF2p is not tolerable for cell growth.