Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has created unprecedented healthcare challenges. Neurologic deficits are often an important presenting symptom. To date, the only reported post-infectious COVID-19 manifestations of neurologic disease include cognitive deficits and dysfunction of the peripheral nervous system. Here we report that seizure can also be a post-COVID-19 or “long-COVID” complication. We present a 71-year-old man with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and COVID-19 diagnosed by RT-PCR who initially presented with posterior circulation stroke-like symptoms, which completely resolved after emergent thrombolysis. Six days later, the patient returned with seizure activity, supported by radiographic and electroencephalographic studies. Notably, he was negative for SARS-CoV-2, and no other provoking factor was uncovered after a comprehensive work-up. To our knowledge, this is the first report of post-infectious seizures after a case of COVID-19, highlighting the potential importance of monitoring for neurologic symptoms in COVID-19 patients, even after convalescence.
Introduction: Primary care plays an essential role in stroke prevention. Yet still, for many stroke patients, a relationship with a primary care provider (PCP) is not established until after stroke. Our goal was to determine if lack of PCP and the consequential differences in management affects stroke severity. Methods: Data was obtained from our Institutional Review Board approved stroke admission database from 2017 to November 2019 of all stroke subtypes (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhages). Non-parametric Mann Whitney t-test and regression analysis was used to identify significant differences in medications, stroke risk factors and stroke severity. Results: A total of 559 patients were included, median age 67 (interquartile range (IQR) 58-76), 49% woman, 32% established care with a PCP, 36% on medications for diabetes mellitus (DM), 42% hyperlipidemia, 66% anti-hypertensives, 39% anti-platelet agents, and 10% anticoagulation. More patients with PCP were taking anti-hypertensive medications (80% versus (vs) 60%, p value < 0.0001), DM medications (56% vs 30%, p value < 0.0001), anti-platelet agents (46% vs 35%, p value = 0.0149), and medications for hyperlipidemia (49% vs 39%, p value = 0.0426). Admission NIHSS was lower in patients with a PCP median 6 (IQR 3-11) vs median 9 (IQR 4 -15), p value= 0.0016, and median hemoglobin A1c was higher in patients with a PCP 8 (IQR 5.7- 9.3) vs patients without a PCP prior to their stroke 6 (IQR 5.4 - 8.5), p value= 0.0002. Admitting systolic blood pressure was similar 155 (137-177) vs 152 (134-171). After correcting for age and gender, regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between whether a patient had PCP and antihypertensive medication use (odds ratio (OR) 2.413, 95% confidence interval 1.511 - 3.914) and hemoglobin A1c (OR 1.122, 95% CI 1.037 - 1.215). Also, patients with a PCP were more likely to have a lower NIHSS on admission (OR 0.9679, 95% CI 0.9423 - 0.9930). Conclusions: These result show that patients not followed by a PCP prior to stroke are less likely to be on medications for primary prevention of stroke, contributing to an increased stroke severity on admission. More research is needed to identify barriers to patients establishing care with PCP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.