Insects possess both infection‐induced and constitutively expressed innate immune defences. Some effectors, such as lysozymes and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), are constitutively expressed in flies, but expression patterns vary across tissues and species. The house fly (Musca domestica L.) has an impressive immune repertoire, with more effector genes than any other flies. We used RNA‐seq to explore both constitutive and induced expression of immune effectors in flies. House flies were fed either Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Escherichia coli, or sterile control broth, and gene expression in the gut and carcass was analysed 4 h post‐feeding. Flies fed either bacterium did not induce AMP expression, but some lysozyme and AMP genes were constitutively expressed. Prior transcriptome data from flies injected with bacteria also were analysed, and these constitutively expressed genes differed from those induced by bacterial injection. Binding sites for the transcription factor Myc were enriched upstream of constitutively expressed AMP genes, while upstream regions of induced AMPs were enriched for NF‐κB binding sites resembling those of the Imd‐responsive transcription factor Relish. Therefore, we identified at least two expression repertoires for AMPs in the house fly: constitutively expressed genes that may be regulated by Myc, and induced AMPs likely regulated by Relish.
Antibiotic resistance is a continuing challenge in medicine. There are various strategies for expanding antibiotic therapeutic repertoires, including the use of blow flies. Their larvae exhibit strong antibiotic and antibiofilm properties that alter microbiome communities. One species, Lucilia sericata, is used to treat problematic wounds due to its debridement capabilities and its excretions and secretions that kill some pathogenic bacteria. There is much to be learned about how L. sericata interacts with microbiomes at the molecular level. To address this deficiency, gene expression was assessed after feeding exposure (1 h or 4 h) to two clinically problematic pathogens: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. The results identified immunity-related genes that were differentially expressed when exposed to these pathogens, as well as non-immune genes possibly involved in gut responses to bacterial infection. There was a greater response to P. aeruginosa that increased over time, while few genes responded to A. baumannii exposure, and expression was not time-dependent. The response to feeding on pathogens indicates a few common responses and features distinct to each pathogen, which is useful in improving the wound debridement therapy and helps to develop biomimetic alternatives.
Background/aimsSLC4A11 is the only known causative gene of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED). Mutation screenings have shown that most but not all patients with CHED harbour mutations in SLC4A11, suggesting that other CHED-causing genes may exist. We aimed to screen SLC4A11 in Iranian patients to learn the mutation spectrum of this gene among Iranians and to gain further knowledge on potential contribution of other genes to CHED aetiology.MethodsSLC4A11 was screened in 21 Iranian patients with CHED by sequencing. Previously unreported variations were checked in at least 200 controls, and segregation analysis within families and bioinformatics predictions on effects of variations were performed. Exome sequencing was done for the single patient without an SLC4A11 mutation and for her parents.ResultsNine previously reported and 10 unreported SLC4A11 mutations were observed among 20 patients; a mutation was not found in one patient. A mutation in MPDZ was identified as the only candidate cause of CHED in this patient. Her mother who carried the same mutation was diagnosed with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).ConclusionSLC4A11 mutations are the usual cause of CHED in Iranians. The 10 novel mutations observed contribute significantly to the approximately 85 mutations reported since discovery of the role of the gene in CHED pathogenesis more than 10 years ago. MPDZ mutations may be a cause of CHED and even FECD in a minority of patients. Proposed functions of MPDZ with respect to tight junctions and maintenance of the corneal endothelial barrier are in accordance with a role in corneal endothelial pathobiology.
Organisms can use constitutive or induced defenses against natural enemies, such as pathogens, parasites, and herbivores. Constitutive defenses are constantly on, whereas induced defenses are only activated upon exposure to an enemy. Constitutive and induced defensive strategies each have costs and benefits, which can affect which type of defense evolves for a particular threat. Previous modeling that compared induced and constitutive defenses relied on conceptual models that lacked mechanistic details about host defense, did not consider pathogen proliferation rates, or lacked both features. To address this gap, we developed a detailed mechanistic model of the well-characterized Drosophila melanogaster immune response to bacteria with different proliferation rates and environmental distributions. Our model includes a system of differential equations that capture the D. melanogaster immune signaling network. We used our model to evaluate the factors favoring the evolution of constitutive and induced defenses by comparing the fitness of each strategy upon stochastic encounters of flies with bacteria. We found that induction is generally preferred in environments where fly-bacteria interactions are less frequent. We further show that the relative fitness of the induced defense depends on the interaction between the bacterial proliferation rate and the spatial distribution of the bacteria. Also, our model predicts that the specific negative regulators that optimize the induced response depend on the bacterial proliferation rate. Finally, we show that uncertainty over bacterial encounters favors the evolution of an induced immune response. Uncertainty in our model can arise from heterogeneous distributions of bacteria, as well as fluctuations in the density or patchiness of the bacterial population. This result provides evidence that environmental uncertainty favors induced defenses.
Sex chromosomes frequently differ from the autosomes in the frequencies of genes with sexually dimorphic or tissue-specific expression. Multiple hypotheses have been put forth to explain the unique gene content of the X chromosome, including selection against male-beneficial X-linked alleles, expression limits imposed by the haploid dosage of the X in males, and interference by the dosage compensation complex (DCC) on expression in males. Here, we investigate these hypotheses by examining differential gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster following several treatments that have widespread transcriptomic effects: bacterial infection, viral infection, and abiotic stress. We found that genes that are induced (up-regulated) by these biotic and abiotic treatments are frequently under-represented on the X chromosome, but so are those that are repressed (down-regulated) following treatment. We further show that whether a gene is bound by the DCC in males can largely explain the paucity of both up- and down-regulated genes on the X chromosome. Specifically, genes that are bound by the DCC, or close to a DCC high-affinity site, are unlikely to be up- or down-regulated after treatment. This relationship, however, could partially be explained by a correlation between differential expression and breadth of expression across tissues. Nonetheless, our results suggest that DCC binding, or the associated chromatin modifications, inhibit both up- and down-regulation of X chromosome gene expression within specific contexts, including tissue-specific expression. We propose multiple possible mechanisms of action for the effect, including a role of Males absent on the first (Mof), a component of the DCC, as a dampener of gene expression variance in both males and females. This effect could explain why the Drosophila X chromosome is depauperate in genes with tissue-specific or induced expression, while the mammalian X has an excess of genes with tissue-specific expression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.