Objectives: Since the global broadcast of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria is accelerating, the use of Polymyxin B is sharply increasing, especially in critically ill patients. Unsatisfactory therapeutic effects were obtained because of the abnormal physiological function in critically ill patients. Therefore, the determination of optimal polymyxin B dosage becomes highly urgent. This study aimed to illustrate the polymyxin B pharmacokinetic characteristics by defining the influencing factors and optimizing the dosing regimens to achieve clinical effectiveness.Methods: Steady-state concentrations of polymyxin B from twenty-two critically ill patients were detected by a verified liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry approach. The information on age, weight, serum creatinine, albumin levels, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE-II) score was also collected. The population PK parameters were calculated by the non-parametric adaptive grid method in Pmetrics software, and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics target attainment rate was determined by the Monte Carlo simulation method.Results: The central clearance and apparent volume of distribution for polymyxin B were lower in critically ill patients (1.24 ± 0.38 L h-1 and 16.64 ± 12.74 L, respectively). Moreover, albumin (ALB) levels can be used to explain the variability in clearance, and age can be used to describe the variability in the apparent volume of distribution. For maintaining clinical effectiveness and lowering toxicity, 75 mg q12 h is the recommended dosing regimen for most patients suffering from severe infections.Conclusion: This study has clearly defined that in critically ill patients, age and ALB levels are potentially important factors for the PK parameters of polymyxin B. Since older critically ill patients tend to have lower ALB levels, so higher dosages of polymyxin B are necessary for efficacy.
Objective: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significant effects on renal clearance of drugs. The application of antibiotics in CKD patients to achieve the desired therapeutic effect is challenging. This study aims to determine meropenem plasma exposure in the CKD population and further investigate optimal dosing regimens.Methods: A healthy adult PBPK model was established using the meropenem’s physicochemical parameters, pharmacokinetic parameters, and available clinical data, and it was scaled to the populations with CKD and dialysis. The differences between the predicted concentration, Cmax, and AUClast predicted and observed model values were assessed by mean relative deviations (MRD) and geometric mean fold errors (GMFE) values and plotting the goodness of fit plot to evaluate the model’s performance. Finally, dose recommendations for CKD and hemodialysis populations were performed by Monte Carlo simulations.Results: The PBPK models of meropenem in healthy, CKD, and hemodialysis populations were successfully established. The MRD values of the predicted concentration and the GMFE values of Cmax and AUClast were within 0.5–2.0-fold of the observed data. The simulation results of the PBPK model showed the increase in meropenem exposure with declining kidney function in CKD populations. The dosing regimen of meropenem needs to be further adjusted according to the renal function of CKD patients. In patients receiving hemodialysis, since meropenem declined more rapidly during the on-dialysis session than the off-dialysis session, pharmacodynamic evaluations were performed for two periods separately, and respective optimal dosing regimens were determined.Conclusion: The established PBPK model successfully predicted meropenem pharmacokinetics in patients with CKD and hemodialysis and could further be used to optimize dosing recommendations, providing a reference for personalized clinical medication.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.