Penelitian ini adalah sebuah kajian linguistik atas percakapan telepon dalam bahasa Indonesia pada kasus korupsi yang terjadi baru-baru ini, khususnya sebuah kasus penyuapan. Pendekatan linguistik pragmatis dan sistemik fungsional digunakan sebagai metode untuk mengungkapkan fakta-fakta yang ditemukan pada kasus penyuapan sebagai suatu jenis kasus hukum dalam studi Linguistik Forensik. Percakapan telepon dari dua jenis penyuapan dikumpulkan sebagai data penelitian ini. Data dianalisis secara semantis, pragmatis, dan sintaktis. Ditemukan bahwa para pelaku menggunakan beberapa kode tertentu untuk berkomunikasi. Mereka juga menggunakan cara tertentu untuk menyampaikan tindak tutur lokusi untuk mendapatkan ilokusi untuk mencapai efek perlokusi yang mereka inginkan. Banyak proses materi muncul pada transkrip percakapan telepon para pelaku (koruptor) yang menunjukkan tindakan yang mereka lakukan. Proses materi yang muncul dalam percakapan menunjukkan gejala bahwa permintaan langsung dilakukan oleh pihak yang lebih kuat kepada interlokutor untuk mempersiapkan bahan-bahan.
Automatic short-answer grading (ASAG) is a system that aims to help speed up the assessment process without an instructor's intervention. Previous research had successfully built an ASAG system whose performance had a correlation of 0.66 and mean absolute error (MAE) starting from 0.94 with a conventionally graded set. However, this study had a weakness in the need for more than one reference answer for each question. It used a string-based equation method and keyword matching process to measure the sentences' similarity in order to produce an assessment rubric. Thus, our study aimed to build a more concise short-answer automatic scoring system using a single reference answer. The mechanism used a semantic similarity measurement approach through word embedding techniques and syntactic analysis to assess the learner's accuracy. Based on the experiment results, the semantic similarity approach showed a correlation value of 0.70 and an MAE of 0.70 when compared with the grading reference.
Writing scientific papers is still considered a difficult task for some lecturers, even though according to Law Number 14 of 2005 it is one of the obligations of a lecturer. For this reason, the Media and Cultural Literacy Expertise Group conducts scientific article writing workshops to help lecturers express their ideas and research results systematically according to the rules that apply in the publication of scientific papers. This activity was carried out online and offline by involving approximately 30 lecturers of the Al Islam Polytechnic Bandung. This workshop was conducted using various methods: lectures, discussions, and consultations (coaching clinic). The materials include the introduction of scientific papers, techniques for writing scientific articles, strategies to avoid plagiarism and the practice of using digital reference management programs. Evaluation of this activity was carried out using pretest-posttest and filling out a questionnaire. The results of the evaluation showed that most (96.1%) participants considered the material presented according to their needs and all participants (100%) found it very useful and motivated to write scientific articles.
Keywords: scientific articles, writing techniques, hybrid workshop
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.