This paper discusses the gap between the theoretical discourse of the community and community participation in planning, and how community participation actually functions in a contested urban arena. It focuses on a conflict between the municipality and residents of a neighbourhood in the town of Karmiel in Israel, over an elementary-school building conversion into a Kolel (rabbinical study centre). Archival material, planning and legal documents, and media and personal accounts present the conflicting perspectives of the concept of ‘community’ and its actual use; that is, the institutional against the local viewpoints and how they shape and define planning practices. This case study exemplifies the importance of many voices in the planning arena, particularly those of the local community, and suggests that interdisciplinary collaboration among professionals can expand planning knowledge and input on community participation in contested arenas.
This article argues that planning benefits from a historical perspective, affording planners better understanding of current contexts, situations, and the different actors involved. This article draws on integrated historical knowledge acquired from archival research and fieldwork in order to discuss Moshav Gadish, planned and implemented as part of Israel’s nation-building project in the 1950s. Combining official planning material and residents’ personal stories, it highlights the gap between planning intentions and actuality on the ground. A “thick description” of Gadish, derived from the need for deeper understanding of previous planning decisions, emphasizes current planning issues and suggests future planning approaches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.