Objective This study examined clinical adaptations reported by community therapists to multiple evidence-based practices (EBPs) currently implemented in children’s mental health services. Based on an item set informed by Stirman and colleagues’ model (2015), two factors emerged describing Augmenting adaptations and Reducing/Reordering adaptations. We employed multilevel modeling to examine therapist- and practice-level predictors of therapist reports of each type of adaptation. Method Data were drawn from an online survey, including a novel therapist report measure of EBP adaptations, completed by 572 therapists (89.2% female, Mage = 37.08 years, 33.4% Non-Hispanic White) delivering EBPs in the context of a system-driven, fiscally mandated implementation effort. Results Analyses revealed that the two types of therapist adaptations (Augmenting and Reducing/Reordering) could be readily discriminated, with therapists reporting significantly more Augmenting than Reducing/Reordering adaptations. Therapists of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity and with fewer years of experience reported more extensive Augmenting adaptations, but no therapist background characteristics were associated with Reducing/Reordering adaptations. Therapists’ general attitudes that EBPs diverged from their personal approach to therapy were associated with reporting more Augmenting and Reducing/Reordering adaptations. In contrast, negative perceptions toward the specific EBP predicted Reducing/Reordering adaptations, but not Augmenting adaptations. Conclusions Community therapist reports suggest that most adaptations undertaken involve engaging with the practice to augment the fit of the EBPs for local contexts; however, when practices were perceived negatively, therapists were more likely to make adaptations reducing or rearranging components.

Therapists’ perceptions toward evidence-based practices (EBPs) are important in implementation efforts, however little is known about characteristics of EBPs associated with more positive attitudes. This mixed-methods study examined how intervention and implementation characteristics of six EBPs related to therapist attitudes. Quantitative analysis of 793 cross-sectional surveys revealed that therapists endorsed more positive attitudes toward EBPs with 1) prescribed session content and order and 2) required consultation. Associations between these intervention and implementation characteristics and attitudes were not moderated by therapist experience or emotional exhaustion. Qualitative analyses complemented quantitative findings, indicating that “structure” was appealing for interventions and that therapists felt supported by consultation.

This study investigated therapist reports of client engagement challenges in delivering evidence-based practices (EBPs), within the context of a large-scale implementation of multiple practices in children’s mental health services. Data were drawn from an online survey of 668 therapists (88% female, 35.0% Non-Hispanic White). The majority of therapists (75.4%) endorsed at least one client engagement challenge during their implementation of an EBP with an identified client over the previous two months. Two types of EBP client engagement challenges with distinct correlates but similar overall frequencies could be readily differentiated – Expressed Client Concerns and Limited Client Engagement in therapy activities. Limited Client Engagement were more commonly reported for clients with externalizing problems and by therapists with higher emotional exhaustion and negative perceptions of the specific EBP being delivered, whereas Hispanic/Latino therapists were less likely to report Limited Client Engagement. In contrast, Expressed Client Concerns were more commonly reported by therapists with positive general attitudes towards EBPs, and among therapists delivering a parent training EBP. Limited Client Engagement but not Expressed Concerns were linked with therapists’ self-reported ability to carry out the EBP with the target client. Findings suggest that client engagement challenges are frequent during the delivery of EBPs, but may impact implementation differently based on whether they relate to challenges in engaging clients in therapy activities versus addressing concerns raised by clients

This review summarized the literature on psychosocial interventions for youth of color. Ninetythree journal articles of randomized clinical trials, with samples comprised of youth of color, published between 1974 and 2018 were coded for sample characteristics, intervention characteristics, and strategies for incorporating culture into psychotherapy. Results found 69 psychosocial interventions to be efficacious for youth of color; 32% of these psychosocial interventions included a strategy for incorporating culture into psychotherapy. The evidence base was largest for Black and Hispanic/Latinx populations and for psychosocial interventions targeting disruptive behavior problems. The most common strategies for incorporating culture into treatment among effective psychosocial interventions were employing procedures for addressing cultural context and including providers with awareness and knowledge of the client's culture. The inclusion of strategies for incorporating culture was not associated with treatment efficacy. Findings from this review highlight the laudable efforts that have been made to identify efficacious psychosocial interventions for youth of color and illuminate remaining gaps in the evidence base (e.g., efficacious psychosocial interventions for Asian, Native American and Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander youth). Findings also emphasize the nuance of providing effective mental health services that are compatible with client's cultural worldviews, values,and practices and allude to the promise of decision support tools to help providers determine whether, when, and how to culturally tailor their psychotherapy with youth of color.

Findings suggest that cultural identity is linked to the likelihood that ethnic minority therapists may adapt EBPs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).