Background:Cranial vault reconstruction is a complex procedure due to the need for precise 3-dimensional outcomes. Traditionally, the process involves manual bending of calvarial bone and plates. With the advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP), this procedure can be streamlined. Despite the advantages documented in the literature, there have been no case-control studies comparing VSP to traditional open cranial vault reconstruction.Methods:Data were retrospectively collected on patients who underwent craniosynostosis repair during a 7-year period. Information was collected on patient demographics, intraoperative and postoperative factors, and intraoperative surgical time. High-resolution computed tomography scans were used for preoperative planning with engineers when designing osteotomies, bone flaps, and final positioning guides.Results:A total of 66 patients underwent open craniosynostosis reconstruction between 2010 and 2017. There were 35 control (non-VSP) and 28 VSP cases. No difference in age, gender ratios, or number of prior operations was found. Blood loss was similar between the 2 groups. The VSP group had more screws and an increased length of postoperative hospital stay. The length of the operation was shorter in the VSP group for single suture and for multiple suture operations. Operative time decreased as the attending surgeon increased familiarity with the technique.Conclusions:VSP is a valuable tool for craniosynostosis repair. We found VSP decreases surgical time and allows for improved preoperative planning. Although there have been studies on VSP, this is the first large case-control study to be performed on its use in cranial vault remodeling.

The incidence of auricular deformities is believed to be ∼11.5 per 10 000 births, excluding children with microtia. Although not life-threatening, auricular deformities can cause undue distress for patients and their families. Although surgical procedures have traditionally been used to reconstruct congenital auricular deformities, ear molding has been gaining acceptance as an efficacious, noninvasive alternative for the treatment of newborns with ear deformations. We present the successful correction of bilateral Stahl’s ear deformity in a newborn through a straightforward, nonsurgical method implemented on the first day of life. The aim of this report is to make pediatric practitioners aware of an effective and simple molding technique appropriate for correction of congenital auricular anomalies. In addition, it stresses the importance of very early initiation of ear cartilage molding for achieving the desired outcome.

Risk-reducing strategy is a very personal decision for the patient with positive BRCA mutation, and many factors go into choosing which options are best for each individual. We found that age of patient, relative with breast cancer or death of a relative before age 50, and prophylactic oophorectomy all play significant roles in which risk reduction strategy is chosen.

BackgroundHistorically, surgical treatment of children with a delayed presentation of cranial synostosis required complex cranial vault reconstruction. Recently, less invasive options for surgical correction, such as internal distraction osteogenesis, have been explored. In this study, we describe the successful management of delayed presentation of sagittal synostosis using distraction osteogenesis.MethodsA bicoronal incision was made and 2 large rectangular osteotomies were performed bilaterally, involving the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital bones. A 2 cm strut of bone over the sagittal sinus was preserved, creating bilateral free-floating bone segments. Two pairs of distractors were placed transversely, along the midline strut of bone, providing lateral distraction of these segments. This placement allowed maximum displacement at the apex of the cranial vault. Distraction was performed differentially at 1 mm per day anteriorly and 2 mm per day posteriorly, for a total of 17 days, allowing for a greater degree of expansion of the posterior vault. The consolidation phase lasted for 10 weeks. The distractors were removed via the same bicoronal incision and cranioplasty was performed to smooth prominent ridging at the margins of the distracted segments.ResultsThe child’s cranial index improved from 0.67 preoperatively to 0.76 postoperatively. The overall vault contour was smooth with no bony defects. There was a significant cosmetic improvement of the child’s head shape. No major complications requiring reoperation or rehospitalization were encountered.ConclusionThe use of distraction osteogenesis to laterally expand the cranial vault is a useful alternative in the treatment of delayed presentation, nonsyndromic, sagittal synostosis.

IntroductionThere is limited craniofacial literature on the complications of helmet therapy and controversy regarding the effects of inadequate orthotic helmet therapy. The authors present a case of inadvertently prolonged orthotic helmet therapy after endoscopic strip craniectomy for isolated sagittal synostosis.Case presentationA two-month-old Caucasian baby underwent uncomplicated endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy to treat synostosis of the sagittal suture and was fitted for an orthotic helmet two weeks postoperatively. He presented to the craniofacial clinic eight weeks postoperatively with occipital flattening and increased posterior vault height, so the helmet was refitted. During the next 18 months, the helmet was used inconsistently without follow-up. Upon re-presentation, the patient had developed pansynostosis, requiring a subsequent open total cranial vault reconstruction for correction for this secondary deformity.ConclusionsAlthough it remains unclear whether postoperative development of pansynostosis is the result of prolonged helmeting or the consequence of progressive synostotic disease, this report highlights the importance of parent education and judicious scheduled follow-up for the avoidance of potential helmet therapy complications.