No abstract

PurposeWe explored regret in thyroid cancer patients, relating to the decision to accept or reject adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment.MethodsWe studied patients with a recent diagnosis of early stage papillary thyroid carcinoma, in whom treatment decisions on adjuvant radioactive iodine had been finalized. Participants completed a Decision Regret Scale questionnaire. We asked the participants to identify who made the final decision about radioactive iodine treatment. We explored the relationship between decision regret and a) degree of patient involvement in decision-making and b) receipt of radioactive iodine treatment.ResultsWe included 44 individuals, more than half of whom received adjuvant radioactive iodine treatment (26/44). Decision regret was generally low (mean 22.1, standard deviation [SD] 13.0). Participants reported that the final treatment decision was made by the following: patient and doctor (52.3%, 23/44), completely the patient (27.3%, 12/44), or completely the physician (20.5%, 9/44). Decision regret significantly differed according to who made the final decision: the patient (mean 19.0, SD 11.3), patient and doctor (mean 19.5, SD 7.4), and the doctor (mean 32.9, SD 20.37) (F = 4.569; degrees of freedom = 2, 41; p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in decision regret between patients who received radioactive iodine and those who did not (mean difference −2.5; 95% confidence interval −10.6, 5.6; p = 0.540).ConclusionThyroid cancer patients who reported being involved in the final treatment decision on adjuvant radioactive iodine had less regret than those who did not.

In patients with early stage papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) who have had a thyroidectomy, the decision must be made to accept or reject radioactive iodine remnant ablation (RRA). Counselling patients about this decision can be challenging, given the medical evidence uncertainties and the complexity of related information. Although physicians are the primary source of medical information for patients considering RRA, some patients have a desire for supplemental information from sources such as the internet. Yet, thyroid cancer resources on the internet are of variable quality, and some may not be applicable to the individual case. We have developed a computerized educational tool [called a decision aid (DA)], directed to patients with early stage papillary thyroid cancer, and intended as an adjunct to physician counselling, to relay evidence-based medical information on disease prognosis and the choice to accept or reject RRA. DAs are tools used to inform patients about available treatment options and have been utilized in oncologic decision-making. We tested our web-based DA in fifty patients with early stage PTC and found that it improved medical knowledge. Furthermore, participants found the technical usability of the tool acceptable. We are currently conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing the use of the DA plus usual care to usual care alone to confirm the educational benefit of the website and examine its impact on the decision-making process. In the future, DAs may play an expanded role as an adjunct to physician counselling in the care of patients with thyroid cancer.

No abstract

No abstract

A sizable proportion of children with newly diagnosed ALL have pre-morbid DV that could potentially make them more vulnerable to reduced educational opportunities during treatment and neurotoxic late effects following treatment. Identification of the subset of children with ALL and DV is essential to direct early interventions and to study their long-term outcomes.

No abstract