Purpose: Myelofibrosis is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, atypical megakaryocytes, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, and a risk of evolution to acute leukemia. The JAK kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib provides therapeutic benefit, but the effects are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether targeting AURKA, which has been shown to increase maturation of atypical megakaryocytes, has potential benefit for patients with myelofibrosis. Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients with myelofibrosis were enrolled in a phase I study at three centers. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib. Correlative studies involved assessment of the effect of alisertib on the megakaryocyte lineage, allele burden, and fibrosis. Results: In addition to being well tolerated, alisertib reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden in 29% and 32% of patients, respectively, despite not consistently reducing the degree of inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, alisertib normalized megakaryocytes and reduced fibrosis in 5 of 7 patients for whom sequential marrows were available. Alisertib also decreased the mutant allele burden in a subset of patients. Conclusions: Given the limitations of ruxolitinib, novel therapies are needed for myelofibrosis. In this study, alisertib provided clinical benefit and exhibited the expected on-target effect on the megakaryocyte lineage, resulting in normalization of these cells and reduced fibrosis in the majority of patients for which sequential marrows were available. Thus, AURKA inhibition should be further developed as a therapeutic option in myelofibrosis. See related commentary by Piszczatowski and Steidl, p. 4868

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite standard multimodality therapy, median overall survival remains poor with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5% in most studies (range 4.7–13.0%). Strong interest in targeting IDH mutations has led to a variety of studies in both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors and to the approval of IDH inhibitors such as ivosidenib, an IDH1 inhibitor, in hematologic malignancies. Here, we present the first case study of a patient with a recurrent IDH1-mutant glioblastoma who experienced improved seizure control and radiographic stable disease for more than 4 years while treated with ivosidenib. Such findings support the further development of IDH inhibitors as single agents and/or in combination for the treatment of IDH-mutant glioma.

Introduction: Tranylcypromine (TCP) is an irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor, a potent antidepressant that has been in use since the 1960s. Additionally, TCP has been demonstrated to inhibit lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A (LSD1), which is highly expressed in AML (Lee 2006; Berglund 2008). Preclinical studies combining TCP and ATRA induced differentiation and impaired clonogenic survival in non-APL AML cell lines and primary patient samples. These findings were supported by mouse xenograft models (Schenk 2011). Based on this preclinical work, we pursued an investigator-initiated Phase 1 study of this combination at the University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCT02273102). Methods: A Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and preliminary clinical activity of TCP in combination with ATRA in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory AML and high-grade MDS. The study followed a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design. Safety for all pts and efficacy for all evaluable pts to date are reported. All adverse events were recorded per NCI CTCAE v4.03. All pts received continuous daily dosing of both ATRA (45 mg/m2 in divided doses) and TCP (3 escalating dose levels: 10mg BID, 20mg BID and 30mg BID), with a 3-day lead-in of TCP only during cycle 1. Cycles were 21 days and pts were allowed to remain on study until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: At the time of data cutoff, 15 pts had received therapy with combination TCP/ATRA (8 AML and 7 MDS). Median age was 74 years, 40% were female and 67% white/27% Hispanic/7% black. Overall, the combination was well tolerated, with the majority of treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) Grade 1 and 2. The most common TEAEs (all grades, ≥20%) included dry mouth (33%), dry skin (27%), febrile neutropenia (27%), dizziness (27%), fatigue (27%), headache (27%), rash (27%), increase in creatinine (27%); and vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, infection, urinary frequency and thrombocytopenia all with a frequency of 20%. The most common Grade 3/4 TEAEs included febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), sepsis (13%), lung infection (13%) and anemia (13%). There was 1 DLT of dizziness at the TCP 20mg BID dose level (out of 8 pts) and 2 DLTs of generalized weakness and nausea/vomiting, respectively, at 30mg BID (out of 3 pts). All DLTs were grade 2, but persistent and poorly tolerated. Therefore, TCP 20mg BID was determined to be the MTD and selected as the RP2D. Best evaluable responses per modified IWG/ELN criteria included 5 pts with prolonged stable disease (all 3 months or more) (2 AML, 1 CMML, 2 MDS), 1 marrow CR (MDS) and 1 MLFS (AML). Three of the 4 MDS/CMML responders had hematologic improvement (HI) (2 HI-P and 1 HI-P and HI-E). One AML pt also recovered neutrophils (0.62 to 14.75) with a decrease in blasts but did not meet response criteria. The 2 pts with best response of marrow CR and MLFS continued on study for 7 and 10 months, respectively. Importantly, these 2 pts and a third pt who had prolonged SD (5 months) plus HI-P/HI-E were all taken off study for cumulative skin toxicity (not progression), and the marrow CR and MLFS pts are both still alive. Conclusions: TCP/ATRA combination therapy has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in pts with R/R AML and MDS, and additionally has demonstrated clinical activity. TCP 20mg BID is the RP2D, and a phase 1 dose expansion at this dose level is ongoing. In responders, skin toxicity may be treatment duration-limiting due to continuous exposure to ATRA, and an intermittent ATRA schedule after cycle 4 may be pursued for the phase 2 study. Additional data will be presented at the meeting, including myeloid mutational analysis, RNA-seq and ATAC-seq, in order to delineate pre- and post-treatment molecular profiles and chromatin accessibility in these pts. Preliminary data (not shown) suggest that a baseline gene expression pattern may predict sensitivity or resistance to TCP/ATRA. Disclosures Watts: Takeda: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Swords:AbbVie: Employment.

Background: The selective AURKA inhibitor alisertib (MLN8237) exhibits disease modifying activity in murine models of myelofibrosis by eradicating atypical megakaryocytes resulting in reduction of marrow fibrosis (Nat Med 2015). Here, we present long term follow-up results from the investigator initiated pilot study of alisertib in patients with myelofibrosis (clinical trials.gov Identifier NCT 02530619). Methods: 24 patients with DIPSS intermediate 1, intermediate-2, or high risk myelofibrosis who were in need of therapy, refractory/intolerant or unlikely to respond to JAK inhibitors with neutrophil count ≥ 1 x109/L, and platelet count ≥ 50 x109/L, received alisertib (provided by Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc) at a dose of 50 mg twice daily for one week every 21 days. Toxicity assessment was performed by the standard common terminology criteria (Version 4.0). Response was assessed by the international working group for myelofibrosis research and treatment (IWGMRT) criteria. Correlative studies included assessments of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutant allele burden, degree of fibrosis and GATA1 expression in bone marrow samples obtained pre and post therapy. Results: We enrolled 17 patients with primary myelofibrosis, 4 with post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis and 3 with post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis. Median age was 72 years with 66% males. 79% of patients were DIPSS intermediate risk, and the remainder were high risk with 15 patients (62.5%) having received prior JAK inhibitor therapy. Driver mutational status was as follows; 58% JAK2V617F, 29% CALR, and 13% MPL mutated. At study entry, 54% of patients demonstrated palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin, 54% were transfusion dependent with all patients experiencing constitutional symptoms. At the time of data cut-off, patients received a median of 7.5 cycles (range; 1-29 cycles) of therapy. The 7 patients presently on study have received a median of 23 cycles (range; 8-29 cycles). Reasons for treatment discontinuation included progressive disease/lack of response in 11 (65%) patients, toxicity in 4 (24%) patients and refusal of further therapy in 2 (11%) patients.Safety and Efficacy assessments The most common treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (29%) and anemia (21%), with 4% each experiencing neutropenic fever, diarrhea, vertigo, elevated creatinine and elevated alanine aminotransferase. 22 patients were considered for response evaluation with 4 of 14 patients (29%) with palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm achieving a spleen response, 1 of 13 patients (8%) becoming transfusion independent, and 5 of 22 patients (23%) experiencing symptom response with ≥ 50% reduction in the MPN-SAF total symptom score. However, when response assessment was restricted to 13 patients who had received a minimum of 5 cycles of therapy, spleen responses were observed in 4 of 7 (57%) patients, 1 of 5 (20%) achieved transfusion independence and 5 of 13 (38%) achieved symptom response. All patients presenting with leukocytosis (n=4) and thrombocytosis (n=2) had resolution with therapy. Of the 7 patients presently on study, four patients continue to demonstrate symptom response, two patients with both spleen and symptom response, and another patient with sustained anemia response. Correlative assessments We compared the intensity of staining of GATA1, a factor that is required for maturation, in sequential bone marrow biopsies from six patients at baseline and after a minimum of five cycles and observed a striking increase in the numbers of GATA1-positive megakaryocytes in five of six cases (Figure 1a). In addition, we observed a one grade reduction in marrow fibrosis in 4 of 6 paired samples (Figure 1b). This reduction in fibrosis was accompanied by sustained responses to the drug. Finally, we compared JAK2, MPL or CALR mutant allele burden in eight paired baseline and cycle 5 or 6 samples and observed decreases in 4 of 8 patients (Figure 1c). Conclusions: Alisertib is safe and well tolerated in patients with myelofibrosis with prolonged administration up to 1.7 years. In addition to providing clinical benefit, alisertib restored normal morphology and GATA1 expression in atypical megakaryocytes and reduced marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burdens. These findings demonstrate that AURKA inhibition should be further explored as a therapeutic option in myelofibrosis. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Swords: AbbVie: Employment. Watts:Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Frankfurt:Celgene, Jazz, Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Cyclacel: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Epizyme: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Ariad: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Bayer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Celator: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; FujiFilm: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Agios: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct the trial ; Astellas Pharma: Other; Genetech: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; GSK: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Immune Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boeringer Ingelheim: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work. Rampal:Celgene: Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria. Giles:Actuate Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Crispino:Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Scholar Rock: Research Funding.

Toca 511 (vocimagene amiretrorepvec) is an investigational, conditionally lytic retroviral replicating vector (RRV) that selectively infects cancer cells. Toca 511 spreads through tumors, stably delivering an optimized cytosine deaminase (CD) gene that converts the prodrug, Toca FC (investigational, extended-release 5-FC), into 5-FU. Based on preclinical studies, 5-FU kills infected dividing cancer cells and diffuses and kills surrounding cancer cells, myeloid derived suppressor cells, and tumor associated macrophages, thus reestablishing tumor immunity. In a previous Phase 1 study, intravenous (IV) injection of Toca 511 successfully delivered and expressed CD protein to high grade glioma tumors. In animal models of metastatic colorectal cancer, IV Toca 511 infected metastatic sites, and subsequent 5-FC treatment resulted in decreased tumor size and improved survival. Toca 6 is a Phase 1b, multicenter, open-label study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT02576665) designed to investigate changes in immune activity after treatment with Toca 511 & Toca FC. Vector deposition and transgene expression in tumor tissue following IV delivery of Toca 511 also is followed. Toca 511 is injected IV daily for 3 days, with subsequent injection either intratumorally after biopsy or, in the brain tumor setting, into resection cavity walls following resection. Oral Toca FC is started approximately 4 weeks later and repeated every 4-6 weeks. A total of 30 patients are planned to be enrolled. In patients treated to date, viral RNA, DNA, and CD protein expression after IV Toca 511 delivery have been detected in liver metastases from colorectal cancer and mesenteric lymph node metastases from pancreas cancer, demonstrating IV delivery of virus to and transgene expression in tumor. Preliminary data indicate treatment has been generally well tolerated to date, with few related adverse events. Data on changes from baseline in immune activity in tumor (infiltrating T-cell subpopulations, B cells, monocytes) and peripheral blood (effector, memory, Treg, and myeloid lineage cells), viral and CD protein expression in tumor, and safety will be presented. Citation Format: Jaime Merchan, Jordi Rodon, Gerald Falchook, Shree Venkat, Derek Ostertag, Dalissa Tejera, Thian Kheoh, Douglas J. Jolly, Harry E. Gruber, Jolene S. Shorr. A phase Ib study of Toca 511, a retroviral replicating vector, followed by Toca FC in patients with advanced cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT067.

216 Background: The University of Miami’s Phase I Program is South Florida’s only academic Phase I center dedicated to drug development for cancer patients. On April 2018, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center opened the Phase I/Experimental Therapeutics (ET) Clinic dedicated to research patients enrolled in Phase I clinical trials and established a multi-disciplinary care team. As Phase I clinical trials are evolving, it is necessary to improve on the patient experience as it pertains to research care. Methods: Using a Likert-type scale, dual language survey (English and Spanish), patients were asked 11 questions about the Phase I/ET Clinic visit ranging from the beginning of their Phase I clinical trial enrollment all the way to provider care during the visit. The survey was conducted from January 2019-April 2019 through a secure, HIPAA compliant online Research Electronic Data Capture software (REDCap). Results: Of the 30 patients that were approached, 26 responded (Renal 26.9%, Myelofibrosis 19.2%, Bladder 15.4%, Head and Neck 7.7%, Acute Myeloid Leukemia 15.4%, Myelodysplastic Syndrome 7.7%, and Other 7.7%). Our results found that 100% of research patients would recommend a Phase I clinical trial to another participant. In addition, 96.2% of patients felt there was continuation of their care through their clinical trial process. As a note, 19.2% of patients positively recognized a Phase I provider including Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and physicians. Of these 19.2% of patients, 50% praised an NP in the free text area of the survey. Lastly, 42.3% of patients positively mentioned the team support received in the Phase I Clinic in the free text area of the survey. Conclusions: Our conclusion based on survey results show that having committed providers and clinic space for research patients on a Phase I clinical trial provided an overall positive and personalized experience. Additionally, the survey reflects on how patients are more inclined to refer to a clinical trial due to a good experience. Future directions should look at developing a similar clinic for all phases of research considering the exceptional patient feedback emphasizing on provider care.

<div>AbstractPurpose:<p>Myelofibrosis is characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, atypical megakaryocytes, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, and a risk of evolution to acute leukemia. The JAK kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib provides therapeutic benefit, but the effects are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether targeting AURKA, which has been shown to increase maturation of atypical megakaryocytes, has potential benefit for patients with myelofibrosis.</p>Patients and Methods:<p>Twenty-four patients with myelofibrosis were enrolled in a phase I study at three centers. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib. Correlative studies involved assessment of the effect of alisertib on the megakaryocyte lineage, allele burden, and fibrosis.</p>Results:<p>In addition to being well tolerated, alisertib reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden in 29% and 32% of patients, respectively, despite not consistently reducing the degree of inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, alisertib normalized megakaryocytes and reduced fibrosis in 5 of 7 patients for whom sequential marrows were available. Alisertib also decreased the mutant allele burden in a subset of patients.</p>Conclusions:<p>Given the limitations of ruxolitinib, novel therapies are needed for myelofibrosis. In this study, alisertib provided clinical benefit and exhibited the expected on-target effect on the megakaryocyte lineage, resulting in normalization of these cells and reduced fibrosis in the majority of patients for which sequential marrows were available. Thus, AURKA inhibition should be further developed as a therapeutic option in myelofibrosis.</p><p><i>See related commentary by Piszczatowski and Steidl, p. 4868</i></p></div>

No abstract