Ras proteins are binary switches that, by cycling between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound conformations, regulate multiple cellular signalling pathways including those that control cell growth, differentiation and survival. Approximately 30% of all human tumours express Ras-containing oncogenic mutations that lock the protein into a constitutively active conformation. The activation status of Ras is regulated by two groups of proteins: GEFs (guanine nucleotide-exchange factors) bind to Ras and enhance the exchange of GDP for GTP, thereby activating it, whereas GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins) inactivate Ras by binding to the GTP-bound form and enhancing the hydrolysis of the bound nucleotide back to GDP. In this review, we focus on a group of key regulators of Ras inactivation, the GAP1 family of Ras-GAPs. The members of this family are GAP1m, GAP1IP4BP, CAPRI (Ca2+-promoted Ras inactivator) and RASAL (Ras-GTPase-activating-like protein) and, as we will discuss, they are emerging as important modulators of Ras and small GTPase signalling that are subject to regulation by a diverse array of events and second messenger signals.
. Chem. 281:9891-9900, 2006). Here, we have examined the mechanism through which GAP1 IP4BP can function as a Rap1 GAP. We show that deletion of domains on either side of the RasGRD, while not affecting Ras GAP activity, do dramatically perturb Rap1 GAP activity. By utilizing GAP1 IP4BP /GAP1 m chimeras, we establish that although the C2 and PH/Btk domains are required to stabilize the RasGRD, it is this domain which contains the catalytic machinery required for Rap1 GAP activity. Finally, a key residue in Rap1-specific GAPs is a catalytic asparagine, the so-called asparagine thumb. By generating a molecular model describing the predicted Rap1-binding site in the RasGRD of GAP1 IP4BP , we show that mutagenesis of individual asparagine or glutamine residues that lie in close proximity to the predicted binding site has no detectable effect on the in vivo Rap1 GAP activity of GAP1 IP4BP . In contrast, we present evidence consistent with a model in which the RasGRD of GAP1 IP4BP functions to stabilize the switch II region of Rap1, allowing stabilization of the transition state during GTP hydrolysis initiated by the arginine finger.The Ras-like family of small GTPases are ubiquitously expressed, evolutionarily conserved proteins that, by undergoing conformational changes in response to the alternate binding of GDP and GTP, function as binary switches (28, 31, 35). The GDP-bound "off" state and the GTP-bound "on" state recognize distinct effector proteins, thereby allowing the regulation of a variety of downstream signaling events (28,31,35). While Ras is the best-known and best-studied Ras-like GTPase, Rap1 has recently attracted considerable attention (reviewed in reference 20).Rap1 was originally identified through its ability, when overexpressed, to reverse the phenotype of K-Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells (19). As Ras and Rap1 have very similar effector regions, the ability of Rap1 to reverse the transformed phenotype appeared to arise through an ability to compete with K-Ras effectors. For example, Rap1 binds the Ras effector Raf1 but this does not lead to its activation (11). This is consistent with a simple model in which Rap1 functions as a Ras antagonist (6, 37). However, recent work has challenged this view. Increasing evidence points to Rap1 interacting with its own panel of effectors through which it controls cell-cell adhesion and cell-matrix interactions (reviewed in reference 20).
The inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinases comprise a family of enzymes (A, B, and C) that phosphorylate the calcium mobilising molecule inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate (IP3) to generate inositol (1,3,4,5) tetrakisphosphate. This molecule can function as a second messenger, but its roles are not completely understood. The A isoform of inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinase localises to filamentous actin within dendritic spines in the hippocampus and is implicated in the regulation of spine morphology and long term potentiation, however the mechanisms through which it signals in neuronal cells are not completely understood. We have used NGF driven neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells as a platform to examine the impact of signaling via inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinase activity in a neuronal cell. We have found that the catalytic activity of the enzyme opposes neurite outgrowth, whilst pharmacological inhibition of inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinase leads to a significant increase in neurite outgrowth, and we show that the reduction in neurite outgrowth in response to inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate 3-kinase activity correlates with reduced ERK activity as determined by western blotting using phosphorylation-specific antibodies. Our findings suggest a novel neuronal signaling pathway linking metabolism of IP3 to signaling via ERK.
This review provides tools to consider the inclusion of healthy volunteers (HVs) in first‐in‐human (FIH) oncology clinical trials with small molecules, including targeted and immunomodulatory agents, a strategy that was not envisioned with classic chemotherapy. To enable an FIH oncology trial in HVs compared to cancer patients (CPs), a robust nonclinical package must be generated, which includes toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic studies, as well as more extensive safety pharmacology, toxicology and genotoxicity studies. This strategy could provide an early clinical characterization of the pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical safety profile in the absence of comorbidities and concomitant medication. It also avoids the ethical issue of administrating subtherapeutic doses to CPs, and could potentially help to accelerate the timelines of clinical drug development for patient care. That being said, stakeholders involved in these studies need to proceed with caution, fully understand the regulatory guidance and thoroughly evaluate the benefits and risks. This paper serves to address the regulatory guidance and other considerations needed when using healthy volunteers in early oncology trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.