In this paper, we describe a heuristic algorithm based on local search for the Single-Source Uncapacitated (SSU) concave Minimum-Cost Network Flow Problem (MC-NFP). We present a new technique for creating different and informed initial solutions to restart the local search, thereby improving the quality of the resulting feasible solutions (upper bounds). Computational results on different classes of test problems indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method in generating basic feasible solutions for the SSU concave MCNFP very near to a global optimum. A maximum upper bound percentage error of 0.07% is reported for all problem instances for which an optimal solution has been found by a branchand-bound method.
We address the single-source uncapacitated minimum cost network flow problem with general concave cost functions. Exact methods to solve this class of problems in their full generality are only able to address small to medium size instances, since this class of problems is known to be NP-Hard. Therefore, approximate methods are more suitable. In this work, we present a hybrid approach combining a genetic algorithm with a local search. Randomly generated test problems have been used to test the computational performance of the algorithm. The results obtained for these test problems are compared to optimal solutions obtained by a dynamic programming method for the smaller problem instances and to upper bounds obtained by a local search method for the larger problem instances. From the results reported it can be shown that the hybrid methodology improves upon previous approaches in terms of efficiency and also on the pure genetic algorithm, i.e., without using the local search procedure.
The Assembly Line Part Feeding Problem (ALPFP) is a complex combinatorial optimisation problem concerned with the delivery of the required parts to the assembly workstations in the right quantities at the right time. Solving the ALPFP includes simultaneously solving two sub-problems, namely tour scheduling and tow-train loading. In this article, we first define the problem and formulate it as a multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming model. Then, we carry out a complexity analysis, proving the ALPFP to be NP-complete. A modified particle swarm optimisation (MPSO) algorithm incorporating mutation as part of the position updating scheme is subsequently proposed. The MPSO is capable of finding very good solutions with small time requirements. Computational results are reported, demonstrating the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed MPSO.
Abstract. A Biased Random Key Genetic
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been one of the fastest-growing areas of operations research during the last decades. The academic attention devoted to MCDA motivated the development of a great variety of approaches and methods within the field. These methods distinguish themselves in terms of procedures, theoretical assumptions and type of decision addressed. This diversity poses challenges to the process of selecting the most suited method for a specific real-world decision problem. In this paper we present a case study in a real-world decision problem arising in the painting sector of an automobile plant. We tackle the problem by resorting to the well-known AHP method and to the MCDA method proposed by Pereira and Fontes (2012) (MMASSI). By relying on two, rather than one, MCDA methods we expect to improve the confidence and robustness of the obtained results. The contributions of this paper are twofold: first, we intend to investigate the contrasts and similarities of the results obtained by distinct MCDA approaches (AHP and MMASSI); secondly, we expect to enrich the literature of the field with a real-world MCDA case study on a complex decision making problem since there is a paucity of applied research work addressing real decision problems faced by organizations.
This work addresses the flexible job shop scheduling problem with transportation (FJSPT), which can be seen as an extension of both the flexible job shop scheduling problem (FJSP) and the job shop scheduling problem with transportation (JSPT). Regarding the former case, the FJSPT additionally considers that the jobs need to be transported to the machines on which they are processed on, while in the latter, the specific machine processing each operation also needs to be decided. The FJSPT is NP‐hard since it extends NP‐hard problems. Good‐quality solutions are efficiently found by an operation‐based multistart biased random key genetic algorithm (BRKGA) coupled with greedy heuristics to select the machine processing each operation and the vehicles transporting the jobs to operations. The proposed approach outperforms state‐of‐the‐art solution approaches since it finds very good quality solutions in a short time. Such solutions are optimal for most problem instances. In addition, the approach is robust, which is a very important characteristic in practical applications. Finally, due to its modular structure, the multistart BRKGA can be easily adapted to solve other similar scheduling problems, as shown in the computational experiments reported in this paper.
The painting activity is one of the most complex and important activities in automobile manufacturing. The inherent complexity of the painting activity and the frequent need for repainting usually turn the painting process into a bottleneck in automobile assembly plants, which is reflected in higher operating costs and longer overall cycle times. One possible approach for optimizing the performance of the paint shop is to improve the efficiency of the color planning. This can be accomplished by evaluating the relative merits of a set of vehicle painting plans. Since this problem has a multicriteria nature, we resort to the multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodology to tackle it. A recent trend in the MCDA field is the development of hybrid approaches that are used to achieve operational synergies between different methods. Here we apply, for the first time, an integrated approach that combines the strengths of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), aided by Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Aid (GAIA), to the problem of assessing alternative vehicle painting plans. The management of the assembly plant found the results of value and is currently using them in order to schedule the painting activities such that an enhancement of the operational efficiency of the paint shop is obtained. This efficiency gain has allowed the management to bid for a new automobile model to be assembled at this specific plant.Keywords: AHP; automobile paint shop; GAIA; multicriteria decision analysis; PROMETHEE evaluation of painting plans would be simpler if the assessment was based solely on one criterion (for instance, reduction of paint consumption (PC) levels). However, the appropriate treatment of this problem should embrace the inherent complexity of the painting system by taking into account all the relevant criteria affecting the decision. These criteria can be of qualitative or quantitative nature and they reflect different dimensions of the decision process (e.g., technological, economical, and environmental dimensions), which influence the decision-making process in various degrees. Besides, they are often conflicting since there exists no alternative optimizing all the criteria at the same time. The conflicting nature of criteria requires a trade-off between them. The problem of evaluating painting plans is characterized by all the aforementioned features thus having a multicriteria nature. For this reason, we resort to an MCDA methodology to address this problem.The application of MCDA to the problem of evaluating alternative painting plans in automobile assembly plants was first proposed by Oliveira et al. (2014). Besides introducing this new paint shop problem, the authors performed an assessment of a set of painting plans using two distinct MCDA methods: the AHP and the less-known MMASSI (multicriteria methodology for supporting the selection of information systems) method (Pereira and Sameiro de Carvalho, 2005). These method...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.