Does the ability of medical students to assess and relate to their patients through the psychiatric interview reflect in traditional academic achievement scores? A previous publication by our group offers data suggesting that certain personality traits of final year medical students have a fundamental importance in determining a successful performance on a psychiatry rotation. As the literature is vague and contradictory about the relation-ship between the psychiatric interview and clinical performance, a study was developed to determine what outcome variables are associated with the performance of clinical clerks on the Psychiatric Interview’ An attempt was made to develop and test a new scale designed to measure the Psychiatric Interview. The Psychiatric Interview Scale was used to measure performance on 33 final year medical students on a 1 month psychiatry rotation at a University of Toronto teaching hospital, and subsequently, as a basis for analysis and training of these students in interviewing. Inter-rater reliability of the Psychiatric Interview Scale was rho = 0.72 and internal reliability was 0.74. Psychiatric Interview Scores were compared with other achievement scores, and with patients’ ratings of the students interviews. A significant correlation emerged between the Psychiatric interview scores and final clinical examinations, but surprisingly, there was no relationship between the patients’ evaluation of the Psychiatric Interview and the raters’ evaluations and a strongly significant negative correlation between patients’ ratings and clinical scores. The importance of observed psychiatric interviews in teaching and evaluation are discussed along with the interesting implications of the differing evaluations of a successful interview by patients and psychiatrists. The relevance of training in the Psychiatric Interview to general medicine and family practice is emphasized.
An attempt was made in this study to develop a composite profile of personality characteristics of medical students that correlated differentially with successful achievement outcomes in the Psychiatry CLerkship at a University of Toronto teaching hospital. Data on 27 of 33 final year medical students in a psychiatry rotation programme were used to analyse canonical correlations between personality and achievement variables. The findings of the study indicated that success in clinical examinations was significantly correlated (R = 0.64, P less than 0.001) with a personality defined as apprehensive, anxious and less neurotic. Success on oral examinations was significantly correlated (R = 0.37, P less than 0.01) with a personality defined as anxious, more neurotic and extroverted. Success in objective multiple choice tests was not significantly correlated (R = 0.21, P = 0.10) with any particular personality profile, but the direction of the correlations suggested a personality describable as less intelligent (concrete thinking), apprehensive, adjusted and introverted. Although the small sample makes conclusions tentative, the findings are that students' personality differentially affect their examination results.
No abstract
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.