Types 1, 2A, and 3 of the JNET classification were very reliable indicators for HP/SSP, LGD, and SM-d carcinoma, respectively. However, the specificity and positive predictive value of Type 2B were relatively lower than those of others. Therefore, an additional examination such as pit pattern diagnosis using chromoagents is necessary for accurate diagnosis of Type 2B lesions.

No abstract

Key Points KIT exon 17 mutation is a poor prognostic factor in AML patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, but not in those with CBFB-MYH11. NRAS mutation is a poor prognostic factor in AML patients with CBFB-MYH11.

No abstract

Background and study aims  Japanese guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy have recommended temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants (warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], or heparin) to prevent hemorrhagic complications during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasias (CRNs). However, serious thrombosis might occur during temporary withdrawal of anticoagulants. The current study aimed to evaluate outcomes with anticoagulants in patients undergoing ESD for CRNs. Patients and methods  This study was a single-institution retrospective cohort study based on clinical records. We assessed 650 consecutive patients with 698 CRNs who underwent ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between December 2010 and June 2016. The patients were divided into three groups: the warfarin group (19 patients with 19 CRNs), DOAC group (7 patients with 9 CRNs), and no-antithrombotics group (624 patients with 670 CRNs). We replaced warfarin with heparin 3 to 5 days before endoscopy. Although DOAC was suspended on the morning of endoscopy, we did not replace heparin. Results  Bleeding after the procedure occurred in 26.3 % (5/19), 22.0 % (2/9), and 2.7 % (18/670) of patients in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. In the warfarin group, four patients who bled after the procedure took not only warfarin but also other antiplatelets. En bloc resection rates were 94.7 % (18/19), 100 % (9/9), and 96.6 % (647/670) in the warfarin, DOAC, and no-antithrombotics groups, respectively. No patients experienced ischemic events in the perioperative period. Conclusions  Among patients undergoing ESD for CRNs, risk of bleeding was higher among patients who took anticoagulants than among those who did not. In particular, careful attention to patients who took antiplatelets in addition to warfarin before ESD for CRNs is warranted.

No abstract

Background: Dual red imaging (DRI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopic technique, is expected to improve visibility of thin vessels, but no reports of the clinical use of DRI in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been published. We aimed to compare the visibility of vessels, demarcation line between the submucosal and muscle layers after injection of hyaluronate sodium with minute indigo carmine, and fibrosis on DRI with that on white light imaging (WLI). We applied the principle of DRI to the image of the submucosal layer during colorectal ESD as a pilot study. Methods: A total of seven physicians compared 17 DRI images to the corresponding WLI images in colorectal ESD. The physicians compared the number of arteries identified on DRI with the actual number of arteries. The physicians rated the visibility of vessels, the demarcation line between the submucosal and muscle layers after injection of hyaluronate sodium with minute indigo carmine, and fibrosis. Inter-observer agreement was also examined using the kappa statistic. Results: Visibility of vessels and the demarcation line between the submucosal and muscle layers after injection of hyaluronate sodium with minute indigo carmine improved with the use of DRI compared with that using WLI. DRI can discriminate between arteries and veins clearly through the color of the vessels. Conclusions: DRI improves the visibility of vessels, especially that of arteries, as they appear orange, and the demarcation line of the muscle layer. DRI may help to make colorectal ESD safer and faster.

Background and study aims: Poor endoscope operability remains a significant challenge during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We retrospectively evaluated the experience and clinical usefulness of a new single-use splinting tube in deep colonic ESD in the setting of poor scope operability. Patients and methods: Among 691 patients with colorectal tumors treated with ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between November 2009 and July 2015, we analyzed 20 consecutive patients who underwent deep colonic ESD using a single-use splinting tube because of poor scope operability. Poor operability was defined as paradoxical movement of the endoscope, poor control with adhesions, and lesion motion with heartbeat or breathing. Technical and clinical success rates and adverse events were assessed. Results: Paradoxical movement and poor control with adhesions were improved in all cases using the single-use splinting tube. The en bloc resection rate was 95 % (19/20) and histological en bloc resection rate was 100 % (20/20). There were no complications related to use of the splinting tube. Conclusions: Use of a single-use splinting tube helped to overcome poor scope operability in deep colonic ESD.