The purpose of this community service, assess and understand; 1) learning implementation strategy IPS (Social Sciences) Curriculum 2013 based on lesson study in the School of Muhammadiyah Kartasura. 2) Rationalization and elements of curriculum change in 2013. 3) The process of learning and assessment processes appropriate to the curriculum in 2013. The method used; workshops and training. The Place; SMK Muhammadiyah Kartasura. Execution time; odd semester 2014/2015. Subject: Elementary School teachers, Junior High School, High School and Vocational High School Muhammadiyah Kartasura. The results achieved; 1) learning implementation strategy IPS (Social Sciences) curriculum-based lesson study 203 through three stages, namely; plan (planning), do (action and observation), see (reflection). 2) Rationalization and elements of curriculum change in 2013 stressed on; a) The scientific approach is based approach to encourage student creativity; b)Integrity of the competence of knowledge, skills, and attitudes; c) Integrity of the curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular activities. 3) The learning process is emphasized in the curriculum in 2013; (A) Integrated Thematic for elementary school level, (b) Approach Science (Natural Sciences) and IPS (Social Sciences) of partitive aggregative be integrated melt (liquid integrative), (c) religious and moral education, (d) learning objects; natural phenomena, social, and cultural arts. While the emphasisin the assessment process; assessment student achievement by using descriptive qualitative and quantitative numerical. Learning implementation strategy IPS (Social Sciences) 203 curriculum-based lesson study using a modified model of lesson study, achievement indicators for a significant increase from the prior worhshop and trainingafter the workshop, namely; 30%: 80% (pre-test: post-test).
Social Science Teacher Training ModelIn Smp Muhammadiyah Kartasura PENDAHULUANDalam Renstra Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Tahun 2010-2014 dinyatakan bahwa pendidikan sebagai salah satu aspek dalam penentuan human development index (HDI) belum mampu mengangkat peringkat HDI Indonesia dibandingkan dengan indeks pembangunan manusia negara-negara di dunia. Angka HDI Indonesia tahun 2010 berada pada kelompok medium dari sepuluh Negara, Indonesia berada pada posisi terendah. Hal ini disebabkan oleh penanganan masalah pendidikan yang berkaitan dengan indikator HDI seperti buta aksara, lama bersekolah, angka kematian ibu dan anak, serta pendapatan per kapita, yang dilaksanakan lebih agresif di negara-negara tersebut dibandingkan dengan di Indonesia.Selain itu, The World Bank (2005) menemukan perbandingan akses dan kualitas tentang prestasi pendidikan di beberapa negara, seperti Jepang, Korea, Hongkong, Australia, Thailand dan Indonesia, pendidikan di Indonesia hanya mencapai tingkat-tingkat berpikir (ranah kognitif) rendah, yaitu; mengingat, memahami, dan menerapkan, sedangkan untuk tingkat-tingkat berpikir yang tinggi seperti; menganalisis, mengevaluasi, dan mengkreasi masih sangat rendah. (Pedoman Penyaluran Hibah LS Batch VI Dikti, 2013: 1) Hal ini menunjukkan adanya kekurangan (rendahnya mutu) pembelajaran di sekolah-sekolah Indonesia, antara lain; 1) Proses pembelajaran yang dilakukan kebanyakan guru (di Indonesia) hanya
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.