Aim
The aim of this official guideline published by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and coordinated with the German Society of Urology (DGU) and the German Society of Reproductive Medicine (DGRM) is to provide consensus-based recommendations, obtained by evaluating the relevant literature, on counseling and fertility preservation for prepubertal girls and boys as well as patients of reproductive age. Statements and recommendations for girls and women are presented below. Statements or recommendations for boys and men are not the focus of this guideline.
Methods
This S2k guideline was developed at the suggestion of the guideline commission of the DGGG, DGU and DGRM and represents the structured consensus of representative members from various professional associations (n = 40).
Recommendations
The guideline provides recommendations on counseling and fertility preservation for women and girls which take account of the patientʼs personal circumstances, the planned oncologic therapy and the individual risk profile as well as the preferred approach for selected tumor entities.
Aim: To determine quality of life, effectiveness and safety of oral netupitant-palonosetron (NEPA)–based antiemetic prophylaxis in the real-world setting. Materials & methods: Prospective, noninterventional study in adults receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy and NEPA for three cycles. NEPA was administered per summary of product characteristics. Results: A total of 2429 patients enrolled, 2173 were evaluable. ‘No impact on daily life’ due to vomiting was reported by 85%/82% of patients in the highly emetogenic chemotherapy/moderately emetogenic chemotherapy groups in cycle 1, with rates of 54%/59% for nausea. Overall, complete response rate was 89%/87%/75% in the acute/delayed/overall phases. NEPA was well tolerated. Conclusion: NEPA had beneficial effects on the quality of life of a heterogeneous group of cancer patients and was safe and effective in the real-world setting.
The influence of adrenal steroids on sodium transport in hen coprodeum was investigated by electrophysiological methods. Laying hens were maintained on low-NaCl diet (LS), or on high-NaCl diet (HS). HS hens were pretreated with aldosterone (128 micrograms/kg) or dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) before experiment. A group of LS hens received spironolactone (70 or 160 mg/kg, for three days). The effects of these dietary and hormonal manipulations on the amiloride-sensitive part of the short-circuit current were examined. This part is in excellent agreement with the net Na flux, and therefore a direct electrical measurement for Na transport. After depolarizing the basolateral membrane potential with a high K concentration, the apical Na permeability and the intracellular Na activity were investigated by current-voltage relations for the different experimental conditions. Plasma aldosterone concentrations (PA) were low in HS hens, dexamethasone-treated HS hens and spironolactone-treated LS hens (less than 70 pM). In contrast LS hens and aldosterone-treated HS hens had a PA concentration of 596 +/- 70 and 583 +/- 172 pM, respectively. LS diet (chronic stimulation) had the largest stimulatory effect on Na transport and apical Na permeability. Hormone-treated animals had three- to fourfold lower values. Spironolactone supply in LS hens decreased Na transport and apical Na permeability about 50%. The results provide evidence that both mineralo- and gluco-corticoids stimulate Na transport in this tissue by increasing the apical Na permeability. Quantitative differences between acute and chronic stimulation reveal a secondary slower adaptation in apical membrane properties.
Background: Breast cancer (BC) in young patients (<45 years) is an infrequent disease but current evidence suggest that there is an increase incidence in the last decades. After finishing adjuvant therapy, the risk of relapse or death does not increase with pregnancy. Under 40 years, fertility preservation could be an option because pregnancy after 40 usually requires in vitro fertilization techniques.
Purpose
The on-body injector (OBI) automatically delivers pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy (CTx), thus eliminating the need of return visits to the medical office for guideline-compliant pegfilgrastim administration. The CONVENIENCE study aimed to evaluate patient, nurse, and physician preferences as well as health economics for pegfilgrastim administration either with OBI or manually using a pre-filled syringe (PS).
Methods
Patients with early breast cancer, receiving two or three weekly anthracycline/cyclophosphamide or three weekly taxane-based CTx, and patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving first-line R-CHOP-14 or -21 were randomized 1:1 to receive both pegfilgrastim application forms for four consecutive CTx cycles in an alternating sequence starting either with OBI or PS. Primary endpoint was patient preference, assessed by questionnaires.
Results
A total of 308 patients were evaluable in the per-protocol analysis. Patients slightly preferred OBI over PS (OBI, n = 133, 43.2%; vs. PS, n = 111, 36.0%; p-value = 0.159), while study nurses slightly preferred PS (n = 19, 46.3%) over OBI (n = 18, 43.9%) and physicians clearly preferred PS (n = 24, 58.8%) over OBI (n = 15, 36.6%). Among patients with preference for OBI, saving of time was their major reason for preference (53.4%). Pegfilgrastim was administered 24–72 h after each CTx cycle in 97.6% of OBI and 63.1% of PS applications.
Conclusion
The OBI was slightly preferred by patients and saving time was the major reason for their preference. PS was physicians’ most preferable choice and slightly preferred by nurses. Using OBI, pegfilgrastim was almost always administered within the time period recommended by current guidelines, while it was often not applied as specified using PS.
Trial registration
No: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03619993. Registered on June 25, 2018
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.