A novel organic-inorganic layered titanosilicate consisting of Ti-containing MWW-type nanosheets and piperidine ligands was constructed. It exhibited an unprecedented high catalytic activity and recyclability in alkene epoxidation.

The recently developed MM/GBSA_IE method is applied to computing hot and warm spots in p53/PMI-MDM2/MDMX proteinprotein interaction systems. Comparison of the calculated hot (>2 kcal/mol) and warm spots (>1 kcal/mol) in P53 and PMI proteins interacting with MDM2 and MDMX shows a good quantitative agreement with the available experimental data. Further, our calculation predicted hot spots in MDM2 and MDMX proteins in their interactions with P53 and PMI and they help elucidate the interaction mechanism underlying this important PPI system. In agreement with the experimental result, the present calculation shows that PMI has more hot and warm spots and binds stronger to MDM2/MDMX. The analysis of these hot and warm spots helps elucidate the fundamental difference in binding between P53 and PMI to the MDM2/MDMX systems. Specifically, for p53/PMI-MDM2 systems, p53 and PMI use essentially the same residues (L54, I61, Y67, Q72, V93, H96, and I99) of MDM2 for binding. However, PMI enhanced interactions with residues L54, Y67, and Q72 of MDM2. For the p53/PMI-MDMX system, p53 and PMI use similar residues (M53, I60, Y66, Q71, V92, and Y99) of MDMX for binding. However, PMI exploited three extra residues (M61, K93, and L98) of MDMX for enhanced binding. In addition, PMI enhanced interaction with four residues (M53, Y66, Q71, and Y99) of MDMX. These results gave quantitative explanation on why the binding affinities of PMI-MDM2/MDMX interactions are stronger than that of p53-MDM2/MDMX although their binding modes are similar.

The hot spots quantitatively predicted by the recently developed MM/GBSA/IE method reveal a hydrophobic core in the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction.

Polycomb Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) plays a key role in silencing epigenetic gene through trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27). Dysregulations of PRC2 caused by overexpression and mutations of the core subunits of PRC2 have been implicated in many cancers. The core subunits EZH1/ 2 are histone-lysine N-methyltransferases that function as the enzymatic component of PRC2. While the core subunit EED is a scaffolding protein to support EZH1/2 and binds JAR-ID2K116me3/H3K27me3 to enhance the enzymatic activity of PRC2 through allosteric activation. Recently, several small molecules that compete with JARI2K116me3 and H3K27me3 have been reported. These molecules selectively bind to the JARID2K116me3/H3K27me3-binding pocket of EED, thereby preventing the allosteric regulation of PRC2. These first-in-class PRC2 inhibitors show robust suppression in DLBCL cell lines, demonstrating anticancer drugs that target the EED subunit of PRC2 are viable. In this study, we used the recently developed MM/GBSA_IE and the alanine scanning method to analyze the hot spots in EED/inhibitor interactions. The analysis of these hot and warm spots helps us to understand the fundamental differences between inhibitors. Our results give a quantitative explanation on why the binding affinities of EED/A-395 interactions are stronger than that of EED/EED226 while their binding modes are similar and provide valuable insights for rational design of novel EED inhibitors. Hot spots (ΔΔG � 2.00 kcal/mol) and warm spots (2.00 � ΔΔG � 1.00 kcal/mol) (left) and energy components of hot and warm spots (right) of EED in EED/Inhibitor complexes predicted by alanine scanning using MM/GBSA_IE method. Figure 5. Hot (green) and warm spots (yellow) of EED in EED/Inhibitor complexes predicted by alanine scanning with MM/GBSA_IE method. (A-C) Binding pockets of EED proteins that formed by hot and warm spots. (D-F) Close-up view of binding pockets of EED proteins that formed by hot and warm spots.