To compare the efficacy of classical and original methods of meningoradiculolysis for epidural fibrosis of the lumbar spinal canal. Material and Methods. The study included 63 patients who underwent reoperation of the lumbar spine. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using a computer program: original method of meningoradiculolysis was performed in Group I (n = 32), and classical-in Group II (n = 31). Results. The treatment results were evaluated up to 3 months after surgery. Good results amounted to 38.9 % in Group I and to 21.6 % in Group II (p < 0.05). In group II, a punctate injury to the dural sac occurred in 3 patients, which led to postoperative liquorrhea in one case, and temporary or permanent increase in neurological deficit was observed in four cases. Conclusion. The modified method of meningoradiculolysis is technically more valid and safe in performing repeated interventions for epidural fibrosis in the lumbar spine.
Background. Patients with signs of tumor lesions in a single kidney or in the only one functioning kidney, with bilateral renal tumors are at high risk of functional failure or insufficiency of the kidney after surgery. Joint discussions with specialists in X-ray endovascular surgeries resulted in the development of a treatment algorithm for patients with localized kidney cancer who require organ-sparing surgery without ischemic kidney resection.Objective: to evaluation of the immediate results of two-stage surgical treatment of localized kidney cancer in patients with signs of tumor lesions in a single kidney or in the only one functioning kidney, with bilateral renal tumors, including superselective embolization of the artery supplying the tumor at the first stage, and laparoscopic kidney resection without renal ischemia parenchyma at the second stage.Materials and methods. This study included 5 patients with localized kidney cancer, who underwent two-stage treatment at Moscow Regional Oncology Dispensary between 24.03.2021 and 19.04.2021. The first stage included superselective embolization of the artery supplying the tumor; the second stage implied laparoscopic kidney resection 6-7 days following the first stage.Results. The median age of the patients was 62 years (range: 42-73 years). Four patients (80%) had unilateral kidney lesions, while 1 patient (20 %) had bilateral (synchronous) kidney cancer. The mean RENAL score was 8 (range: 6-10); patients were distributed as follows: score 4-6 in 40 %, score 7-9 in 40 %, and score >10 in 20 % of patients. At the first stage, patients underwent endovascular embolization of the branches of the renal artery. Patients had superselective embolization of either middle (n = 3; 60 %), upper (n = 1; 20 %), or lower (n = 1; 20 %) segmental arteries supplying the tumor. In one of them (20 %), we identified 3 large arterial branches; in another one (20 %), we identified 2 large arterial branches.At the second stage, we performed laparoscopic kidney resection. None of the patients required renal artery clamping, because there was an excellent visualization of the demarcation zone and no significant blood loss. The resection area was sutured in 1 case (20 %). In 2 individuals (40 %), a hemostatic sponge was installed in the removed tumor bed. In the remaining 2 cases (40 %), hemostasis was ensured by coagulation. The median blood loss was 100 mL (range: 50-200 mL). The postoperative period was uneventful in all patients. None of the patients developed symptoms of acute renal failure.Conclusion. Thus, superselective embolization of arteries supplying a kidney tumor has undeniable advantages in organ-sparing surgeries for patients with localized kidney cancer and some additional kidney problems, when organ preservation is crucial for patient's life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.