Type and technique of anesthesia have an important effect on per operative surgical course. The aim of the study was prospective analyses of advantages of combined spinal, epidural and general anesthesia (CSEGA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in abdominal surgery according to: 1. operative course (haemodynamic stability of patients, quality of analgesia, undesirables effects), 2. postoperative course (quality of analgesia, unfavourable effects, temporary abode of patients in intensive care). Using prospective randomized double blind controlled study, we evaluated two groups of patients whom the same type of abdominal surgical intervention was planed and the only difference was the type of technique of anesthesia. First group of patients (n = 34), was treated with CSEGA and second group of patients (n = 33), was treated only with standard (GA). Both groups had intraoperative and 24-hour-long postoperative continued monitoring of blood pressure, central venous pressure, and dieresis. In the 24 hours postoperative period, the following parameters were analyzed: vigilance conditions, motor block level, pain intensity in rest and movement, necessity for a complementary analgesia, side effects and final subjective effect of analgesia. There was important difference in waking up the patients after a general anesthesia--in the first group this period was shorter. In the first 24 hours, patients from the first group didn't get any systemic analgesic, while the patients from the second group needed fractionary application of parenteral analgesics in the period of 4-6 hours. Patients from the first group were also physically faster and easier recovered and they had less respiratory complications and there was not any example of thromboembolsm and the intestine motility was faster re-established. First group of patients spent less time in intensive care (three days) than second group (six days). Final subjective effect of analgesia, according to verbal descriptive scale (VDS) of pain was satisfying with 75% of patients of the first group and 15% of patients of the second group. According to results investigation, advantages of CSEDGA versus GA in abdominal surgery manifold: better hemodynamic stability and perfusion of operative region, decrease of single doses of opioid analgesics, local and general anesthetics followed by the decrease of their side effects, better intensity and longer duration of analgesia, improved total functional capability of patients.

The surgeon's ability to recognize abnormal vascular anatomy has greater importance than ever in modern esophagogastric surgical procedures. Some aberrations of vascular vessels around the stomach found during extensive surgery due to primary cancer of the stomach, cardia and lower esophagus are presented in this paper. The purpose of the prospective study is to evaluate and classify these variations with respect to their impact in visceral surgery. A total of 426 patients who underwent total or extensive gastrectomy and esophagectomy combined with lymphadenectomy, have been analyzed prospectively. For the period of 10 years some vascular aberrations have been found in 54/426 (12.67%) of the patients in the operative field during lymphadenectomy as single or combined anomalies. An arterial perigastric anatomy considered normal in textbooks was found in 372 (87.32%) cases. An accessory left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery was found in 19/54 (35.18%), and replaced type in 7/54 (12.96%). The replaced right hepatic artery branching from the superior mesenteric artery was found in 5/54 (7.40%) cases. Replaced and accessory left gastric artery branching from the aorta was found in 8/54 (14.8%); accessory posterior gastric artery was found in 25/54 (44.4%), and abnormalities of the splenic, and subphrenic arteries were found in 6/54 (11.11%). Combined anomalies of both left and right hepatic arteries and variations of the celiac trunk were found in 2/54 (3.70%) cases. Forty-nine cases were classified according to established Michels' typology system. Six cases presented with extremely rare variations and remain unclassified. Possible intraoperative problems concerning postoperative complications are also emphasized.

Diagnosis of intraabdominal bleeding caused by spleen injury must be performed in the shortest possible period of time, with little risk for the patient, and with high preciseness. By its simple performance, high preciseness and little risk for the patient, DPL imposes as the predominant method in initial diagnostic of intraabdominal bleeding. Control and monitoring of lavage may duly signalize degree of bleeding. Preciseness of this diagnostic in our series ranges up to 93.3%. DPL method is especially important in a combined neurotrauma. Ultrasonography is a sovereign method in diagnostic of bleeding source as well as in monitoring of bleeding that from the very beginning does not require urgent surgical intervention. Its importance is in monitoring both intrasplenic and subcapsulary hematomas. It is not appliable in disturbed and haemodynamically unstable patients. It is in particular important in children where a maximum conservative attitude with respect to operative treatment has been assumed. CT takes the leading place with respect to preciseness of bleeding area, and the combined thoracoabdominal trauma. Preciseness of CT in our series comes up to 96.6%, but can be applied only in haemodynamically stable patients. Same as US of abdomen so the CT of abdomen represents a prominent method in monitoring of both intrasplenic and subcapsular hematomas, which do not require urgent surgical intervention.

We report case of 50-year-old female with mediastinitis due to tonsillitis. Mediastinitis was diagnosed after five days according to clinical signs, radiological examination and computerized tomography scan. The patient underwent mediastinal drainage through a cervical incision and bilateral thoracic drainage because of bilateral pleural empyema. Initial broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was replaced with imipenem, amicacin and vancomycin after the bacteriological investigation revealed susceptibility to isolated acinetobacter spp, staphylococcus spp coagulase-negative, enterococcus and staphylococcus. After 46 days of hospitalization patient went home.

This case report discribes the treatment of 67-year-old Jehovah's Witness with severe anemia and gastrointestinal haemorrhage from gastric leiomyoma and peptic ulcer. Minimal invasive surgery with meticulous hemostasis, controlled hypotension, hyperoxic normovolemia and normotermia were main principles. Minimal blood samples for necessary laboratory parameters and noninvasive onitoring were ways to decrease iatrogenic blood loss. The operative and postoperative period were uneventful and well tolerated. The patient was discharged home after eighteen days and well in follow up period.