This study assessed the performance of the trauma team leader in 50 consecutive trauma resuscitations at Liverpool Hospital over a two-month period. The trauma team consists of intensive care (ICU), emergency, and surgical registrars, three nurses, a wardsman, a radiographer, and a social worker. The team leader position alternates between the ICU and emergency registrar on a fortnightly roster. A panel of specialists experienced in trauma management evaluated 38 aspects of the initial resuscitation. Individual variables received different weightings. The maximum possible score for team leader performance was 80. The mean team leader score was 70.4 +/- 8 (SD). The main deficiencies in the team leader's performances were in their interpersonal communications and in the adequacy of documentation of the history of the injury. In 20% of resuscitations there were failures to completely expose the patient. Medical skills were uniformly well performed. Poor communication with other team members were the main pitfall of the team leader in this study. The team leader score may prove a useful tool in improving the quality of the trauma team.
Background: Few Australian studies describe the epidemiology of penetrating trauma. This study describes the incidence and demographic features of penetrating injuries with emphasis on trends and severity analysis. Methods: Case analysis was performed utilizing data from the Liverpool Hospital Trauma Registry (1989–94). NSW Department of Health Hospital Separations (1991–93), and the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics (1991–93) with reference to the Liverpool and Fairfield Local Government Areas (LGA). Results: The Trauma Registry revealed 251 of penetrating trauma. The median age was 26 years (interquartile range 21–33). Ninety‐one per cent of the victims were male. Fourteen per cent of patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. Sixty‐five per cent of cases were stab injuries and 20% gunshot injuries with the abdomen being the most commonly injured site. Twenty‐one per cent of patients underwent laparotomy, 1.6% thoracotomy and 1.2% thoracotomy and laparatomy. There were 10 (4%) deaths. Trends in incidence of penetrating trauma and violent crime involving weapons were analysed. Static trends were observed for the annual incidence of penetrating trauma from the Liverpool Hospital Trauma Registry. Separations for penetrating trauma from Liverpool and Fairfield hospitals showed a slightly increasing trend. Violent crimes involving weapons in the Liverpool and Fairfield LGA showed a static trend. Nevertheless, separations for penetrating trauma and rates of violent crimes involving weapons were higher in south‐western Sydney than metropolitan Sydney or NSW. Eight per cent of the LGA population are Vietnamese but this study identified 16% of victims as being Vietnamese. Conclusions: This study found no significant increase in penetrating trauma or violent crime predisposing to penetrating injury in south‐western Sydney.
Background: There is increasing pressure on surgeons to minimize the time patients stay in hospital, and there is therefore a need to establish guidelines for reasonable lengths of stay for common operations. This study was conducted to test the feasibility and safety of early discharge after open appendicectomy. In addition, this study was performed to provide standards for open appendicectomy against which the results of laparoscopic appendicectomy can be compared. Methods: A prospective study of all patients having open appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney during a 4 month period was undertaken. An early discharge programme was established, with the aim of discharging patients within 48 h of operation in uncomplicated cases. Discharge was allowed when the patient was eating, walking, and had passed flatus. Follow up was with the consultant surgeon at I week postoperatively, and with a community nurse at 2 weeks. Multivariate linear regression, using the number of postoperative hours to discharge as the outcome, was used to analyse the data for the following four factors: age, gender, incision type, and pathology. Results: One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. The median postoperative stay for all patients was 46 h. Perforation of the appendix, use of a midline laparotomy for appendicectomy, and age significantly prolonged hospital stay, but gender had no effect. The main complication was wound infection, which was seen in 7.5% of patients. No patient had a problem directly related to early discharge. A community nurse saw 81% of patients 2 weeks after discharge. Over three‐quarters of the patients seen had returned to full normal activities by 2 weeks, including work or school. Eighty‐eight per cent of patients considered the timing of their discharge ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. Conclusions: Discharge at 2 days after open appendicectomy is both feasible and safe for patients having an unperforated appendix removed through a right iliac fossa incision. Passage of stool is not required prior to discharge. Early discharge is well accepted by patients and may result in financial savings for hospitals where payment is according to Diagnosis‐Related Groups. On the basis of the results of the six randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and conventional open appendicectomy published to date, and on the results of this study, the authors conclude that laparoscopic appendicectomy should not yet be considered the ‘procedure of choice’, and surgeons are justified in performing appendicectomy by either method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.