Eleven generations of selection for increased index of ovulation rate and embryonal survival rate, followed by three generations of selection for litter size, were practiced. Laparotomy was used to count corpora lutea and fetuses at 50 d of gestation. High-indexing gilts, approximately 30%, were farrowed. Sons of dams in the upper 10% of the distribution were selected. Selection from Generations 12 to 14 was for increased number of fully formed pigs; replacements were from the largest 25% of the litters. A randomly selected control line was maintained. Responses at Generation 11 were approximately 7.4 ova and 3.8 fetuses at 50 d of gestation (P < .01) and 2.3 fully formed pigs (P < .01) and 1.1 live pigs at birth (P < .05). Responses at Generation 14 were three fully formed pigs (P < .01) and 1.4 live pigs (P < .05) per litter. Number of pigs weaned declined (P < .05) in the index line. Total litter weight weaned did not change significantly. Ovulation rate and number of fetuses had positive genetic correlations with number of stillborn pigs per litter. Significantly greater rate of inbreeding and increased litter size at 50 d of gestation in the select line may have contributed to greater fetal losses in late gestation, greater number of stillborn pigs, and lighter pigs at birth, leading to lower preweaning viability. Heritabilities of traits were between 8 and 25%. Genetic improvement programs should emphasize live-born pigs and perhaps weight of live-born pigs because of undesirable genetic relationships of ovulation rate and number of fetuses with numbers of stillborn and mummified pigs and because birth weight decreased as litter size increased.

Residual feed intake (RFI) is a measure of feed efficiency defined as the difference between the observed feed intake and that predicted from the average requirements for growth and maintenance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response in a selection experiment consisting of a line selected for low RFI and a random control line and to estimate the genetic parameters for RFI and related production and carcass traits. Beginning with random allocation of purebred Yorkshire littermates, in each generation, electronically measured ADFI, ADG, and ultrasound backfat (BF) were evaluated during a approximately 40- to approximately 115-kg of BW test period on approximately 90 boars from first parity and approximately 90 gilts from second parity sows of the low RFI line. After evaluation of first parity boars, approximately 12 boars and approximately 70 gilts from the low RFI line were selected to produce approximately 50 litters for the next generation. Approximately 30 control line litters were produced by random selection and mating. Selection was on EBV for RFI from an animal model analysis of ADFI, with on-test group and sex (fixed), pen within group and litter (random), and covariates for interactions of on- and off-test BW, on-test age, ADG, and BF with generations. The RFI explained 34% of phenotypic variation in ADFI. After 4 generations of selection, estimates of heritability for RFI, ADFI, ADG, feed efficiency (FE, which is the reciprocal of the feed conversion ratio and equals ADG/ ADFI), and ultrasound-predicted BF, LM area (LMA), and intramuscular fat (IMF) were 0.29, 0.51, 0.42, 0.17, 0.68, 0.57, and 0.28, respectively; predicted responses based on average EBV in the low RFI line were -114, -202, and -39 g/d for RFI (= 0.9 phenotypic SD), ADFI (0.9 SD), and ADG (0.4 SD), respectively, and 1.56% for FE (0.5 SD), -0.37 mm for BF (0.1 SD), 0.35 cm(2) for LMA (0.1 SD), and -0.10% for IMF (0.3 SD). Direct phenotypic comparison of the low RFI and control lines based on 92 low RFI and 76 control gilts from the second parity of generation 4 showed that selection had significantly decreased RFI by 96 g/d (P = 0.002) and ADFI by 165 g/d (P < 0.0001). The low RFI line also had 33 g/d lower ADG (P = 0.022), 1.36% greater FE (P = 0.09), and 1.99 mm less BF (P = 0.013). There was not a significant difference in LMA and other carcass traits, including subjective marbling score, despite a large observed difference in ultrasound-predicted IMF (-1.05% with P < 0.0001). In conclusion, RFI is a heritable trait, and selection for low RFI has significantly decreased the feed required for a given rate of growth and backfat.

Electronic swine feeders are used to automatically measure individual feed intake on group-housed pigs, but the resulting data contain errors caused by feeder malfunctions and animal-feeder interactions. The objectives of this study were to 1) develop criteria to identify errors in data from an electronic feeder that is predominant in the United States; 2) evaluate the frequency of errors in data from three consecutive experiments using the same feeders; and 3) identify factors associated with errors. Across experiments, data included 1,878,321 feed intake records (visits) on 1,721 pigs and 124 pens. Sixteen criteria were developed to detect errors in seven variables related to feed trough weights and times. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the presence or absence of each error type in identified visits (visits where the feeder recognized a transponder) using a model that included the fixed effects of replicate, sex, linear and quadratic effects of day on test, and random effects of feeder within replicate, pig within feeder within replicate, test day within replicate, and week within feeder within replicate. Frequencies of error types in identified visits varied considerably within and between experiments. Errors in feed trough weights were more frequent than errors in time. Percentage of identified visits and of daily feed intake records with at least one error ranged from 4.3 to 18.7% and from 17.2 to 50.0%, respectively, and decreased from the first to the last experiment, reflecting the increasing ability of the managers to operate the feeders. Replicate, sex, test day, feeder within replicate, pig, and day within replicate affected the number of errors that occurred, but their effect varied among error types. Week-to-week variation within a feeder and replicate had the largest effect on number of errors, which was likely associated with feeder management. Results indicate that the frequency of errors in data from electronic swine feeders is substantial, but visits with errors can be identified and their frequency can be decreased by proper feeder management.

Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Implications Literature Cited CHAPTER 3. A MODEL TO ADJUST DAILY FEED INTAKE RECORDS FOR ERRORS IN DATA FROM ELECTRONIC SWINE FEEDERS Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Implications Literature Cited CHAPTER 4. A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF EDITING DATA FROM ELECTRONIC SWINE FEEDERS Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion 80 Implications 90 Literature Cited CHAPTER 5. PERFORMANCE OF GROWING AND FINISHING BOARS AND GILTS FED USING ELECTRONIC VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FEEDERS Abstract Introduction 94 Materials and Methods 95 Results and Discussion 102 iv Implications 113 Literature Cited 114 CHAPTER 6. AN EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES FOR COLLECTING FEED INTAKE DATA USING ELECTRONIC FEEDERS Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Implications Literature Cited Figures CHAPTER 7. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION Summary Literature Cited V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major professor, Jack Dekkers, for his support and guidance. Jack went out of his way to provide professional, financial, and personal support. His input was invaluable to me. He was also a great mentor who I very much enjoyed working with. Thank you for everything Jack. I would also like to thank my committee for their help and input. I enjoyed working with each member of the committee. I would like to say a special thanks to Archie Clutter for his willingness to be on my committee and for traveling so far to do this and to Hal Stem for his help with logistic regression. The work and input from the employees at the Iowa State University swine breeding farm is greatly appreciated. Their help and input ensured the success of the research projects that were done. I really enjoyed working with them and would like to say a special thanks to

and Implications A line of Yorkshire pigs was selected for 3 generations for reduced residual feed intake (RFI), a measure of feed efficiency defined as feed consumed over and above average requirements for maintenance and growth. Heritability estimates of RFI, feed intake, growth, and backfat were 0.30, 0.46, 0.33, and 0.67. Comparison of performance of gilts from the selected line (n=49) to those of a randomly selected control line (n=38) from ~40 to ~70 kg showed that selection had significantly decreased feed intake by 123 g/d. There were no significant differences in average daily gain and backfat between the lines, although the selection line tended to have 22 g/d less growth. In conclusion, RFI is a heritable trait and selection for RFI has significantly decreased the amount of feed required for a given rate of growth and backfat.