Direct determinations and indirect calculations of phloem turgor pressure were compared in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.). Direct measurements of trunk phloem turgor were made using a modified Hammel-type phloem needle connected to a pressure transducer. Turgor at the site of the direct measurements was calculated from the osmotic potential of the phloem sap and from the water potential of the xylem. It was assumed that the water potentials of the phloem and xylem were close to equilibrium at any one trunk location, at least under certain conditions. The water potential of the xylem was determined from the osmotic potential of xylem sap and from the xylem tension of previously bagged leaves, measured with a pressure chamber. The xylem tension of bagged leaves on a branch adjacent to the site of the direct measurements was considered equivalent to the xylem tension of the trunk at that point. While both the direct and indirect measurements of phloem turgor showed clear diurnal changes, the directly measured pressures were consistently lower than the calculated values. It is not clear at present whether the discrepancy between the two values lies primarily in the calculated or in the measured pressures, and thus, the results from both methods as described here must be regarded as estimates of true phloem turgor.A knowledge of the turgor pressure gradients which exist in the sieve elements of higher plants is essential to any evaluation of the pressure flow mechanism of phloem translocation. This mechanism, first proposed by Munch in 1930 (14), states that phloem transport consists of a mass flow of solutes and water, driven by an osmotically generated pressure gradient in the sieve elements.A number of attempts have been made to determine whether the pressure gradients found in the sieve elements are of sufficient magnitude to drive mass flow (5,7,8,10,(15)(16)(17)19). In these studies, two methods have been utilized to evaluate sieve-tube turgor and its gradient. (a) Turgor pressure can be calculated from other parameters of the system, specifically, water potential of the phloem and osmotic potential of the sieve-tube sap (5,8,10,15). (b) Turgor pressure can be measured directly (1, 2,7,16,17,19). Kaufmann and Kramer in 1967 (10) samples, 4, of the same discs was determined. Since an 4, measured in this manner is an average for the entire phloem, it is likely that turgor pressures calculated from these values reflect an average phloem turgor, rather than turgor in the sieve elements alone. Rogers and Peel (15) repeated these experiments in 1975, using small willow trees and cuttings. While 4 of the phloem was measured in the same way as in the previous study, 4,, was determined from sieve-tube sap, collected either from severed aphid stylets or from incisions made in the phloem. Turgor calculated from these measurements is more likely to estimate sieve-tube turgor specifically. Using this refined technique, Rogers and Peel demonstrated that calculated sieve-tube turgor is higher at the apex than at ...