Little information is available that evaluates long-term use of a range of tillage systems and different cropping sequences on poorly drained soils. This study relates corn (Zea mays L.) growth and yield to several reduced tillage systems used with continuous cropping and a corn-soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. Experiments were conducted on Chalmers silty clay loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Haplaquoll) with 40 g kg-• organic matter for 12 yr, and Clermont silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Ochraqualf) with 10 g kg-• organic matter for 7 yr. Both soils are nearly level and poorly drained. Tillage systems compared included moldboard plowing, chisel plowing, ridge planting, and no-till planting. Shallow disking (10 em) was also included at the Clermont site. On the high organic matter Chalmers soil, continuous no-till corn was 25 em shorter at 8 wk, 2% wetter at harvest, and 9.2% lower in yield compared to plowing. Data for chisel and ridge systems were intermediate between plowing and no-till. No-till yields were consistently lower than those for plowing after the first 4 yr. When following soybean, no-till corn was 7 em shorter at 8 wk, 1% wetter at harvest, and 2.6% lower in yield than corn under moldboard plowing. Corn growth and yield from chisel and ridge treatments were equal to those with plowing when in rotation. On the low organic matter soil in continuous notill corn, plant growth and yields were reduced for the first 3 yr, but were equal or better, compared to plowed corn, for the final4 yr. In rotation, no-till corn was equal to plowed corn the first 3 yr and significantly better in 3 of the last 4 yr. Yields with intermediate tillage were similar to plowed yields for continuous and rotational cropping. The relative advantage for no-till planting with time on the low organic matter soil is attributed to improved soil physical properties.
In the mid‐1960‘s farmers were considering no‐plow tillage as a way to cut production costs and achieve more timely planting, and environmentalists were promoting conservation tillage as a primary means of cutting erosion losses. There was an obvious need for a more detailed evaluation of where no‐plow tillage methods were adapted in the Corn Belt. The objective of this research was to determine corn (Zea mays L.) production potential of tillage systems that varied in amount of residue cover and surface roughness on a range of soil types and in different climatic situations. Chisel, till, strip rotary, and strip coulter planting systems were compared with conventional and limited tillage on plowed ground from 1967 through 1970. Experiments were located on sandy loam and loam soils in northern Indiana, silt loam and silty clay loam in eastern Indiana, and on a high silt soil in southern Indiana. There was a latitude range of 290 km in experiment locations. Percent stand was 80% or higher with all systems on sandy loam and loam soils. Chisel and rotary on silt loam, and wheel track, chisel, till and rotary systems on silty clay loam produced 65 to 70% stands and were significantly below conventional at the 5% level. Soil temperature at 10 cm for the first 8 weeks after planting for coulter vs conventional planting was 3.8 C lower in northern Indiana and 2.7 C lower in southern Indiana. However, mean soil temperature for all systems was 3.7 C higher in southern Indiana. Systems with intermediate tillage had intermediate soil temperatures. Corn growth at 8 weeks after planting with no‐plow systems was delayed in northern and eastern Indiana, compared to conventional tillage, with strip rotary and coulter systems having slowest growth. Coulter and strip rotary systems produced fastest corn growth from 4 to 8 weeks after planting in southern Indiana. Four‐year mean grain yields show a 1000 kg/ha advantage for till planting, but no significant variation among other systems on sandy loam (northern Indiana). The yield increase for till planting may have been due to the ridging done at cultivating time. Other systems were not cultivated. At the same location on poorly drained dark loam, yields from strip rotary and coulter systems were significantly lower, at the 5% level, than grain yields from other systems. On poorly drained fine‐textured soils in eastern Indiana, mean yields for all no‐plow systems were lower than mean yields for plow systems, partly due to poor weed control. Four‐year mean yields on the rolling silt loam soil in southern Indiana were not significantly different, although differences among systems within each of the 4 years were significant at the 5% level. Results indicate that with good management, chisel, till, strip, rotary, and coulter systems are adequately adapted on the rolling high silt soils of southern Indiana and on well‐drained loam or sandy loam soils in central and northern Indiana. The no‐plow systems, as used in these tests, were not adapted on poorly drained, fine‐textured so...
Recent adoption of tillage systems that allow maintaining rows in the same place each year, such as no‐till and ridge planting, has renewed interest in strip‐intercropping tall and short crops to more efficiently use sunlight in grain crop production. This study compared eight‐row strips of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] with unstripped eight‐row checks. Corn strips were evaluated with and without extra population and N for outside rows. The trials were conducted from 1986 through 1990 on highly productive prairie soils near Lafayette, IN. Yields were checked by row within eight‐row strips. Stripping increased yield of outside corn rows by an average of 25.8% and decreased yield of outside soybean rows by 26.6%, but had much less effect on yield of second rows in strips. The yield of the center six soybean rows was reduced slightly by stripping. Corn strips with extra population and N yielded 20.0 bu/acre more than nonstripped corn with regular management. Stripped soybean averaged 5.9 bu/acre less than unstripped soybean. Net profit was not increased by strip‐intercropping under conditions of this study. Additional management variables that may improve stripping profitability must be evaluated.
In conservation tillage systems surface application of P and K fertilizers and the annual return of corn residue to the soil surface can result in the stratification of these two nutrients in the topsoil. The extent to which this changes P and K uptake patterns of corn (Zea mays L.) has not been investigated. The objectives of this field study on a Chalmers silty clay loam (Typic Haplaquoll) were to compare the degree of stratification of P and K after 9 yr under conventional, no‐till, and ridge till systems, and to use this data along with root measurements in a model to calculate P and K uptake patterns by corn under these three tillage systems. Under conventional tillage Bray P1‐P and exchangeable K were distributed evenly throughout the topsoil (0–275 mm). Stratification of P and K, however, had occurred in the ridge till and no‐till systems after 9 yr. Of calculated P and K uptake from 30 to 47 d after planting, only 18 and 23%, respectively, came from the upper 75 mm under conventional tillage, compared with 52 and 58%, respectively, under no‐till for the same period. From 30 to 77 d, 39 and 52% of calculated P and K uptake, respectively, was from the upper 75 mm under no‐till compared with only 28 and 26%, respectively, under conventional tillage. Some deep placement of fertilizer P and K may be desirable after several years of continuous no‐till cropping, to provide P and K to roots growing deeper in the soil.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.