The present study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the sulphate-reduction pathway in the anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate. The effects of several COD/SO4 ratios (keeping COD constant) and loadings on anaerobic filter performance were studied and compared with the results from anaerobic filters which followed the methanogenic pathway. Results indicated that the treatability of leachate by sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) was dependent upon the leachate strength. With high strength leachate (COD = 15,000 mg/L) from the Keele Valley Landfill, it was found that at lower COD/SO4 ratios (< or = 1.6) toxic conditions developed in the system that were more inhibitory to the SRB than to the methane producing bacteria (MPB). As the COD/SO4 ratio increased, methanogenesis predominated. No predominance of SRB occurred at any COD/SO4 ratio with high strength leachate. The highest COD removal achieved was about 70% of which 20% was accomplished by the SRB at a COD/SO4 ratio of 1.6 and an organic loading rate (OLR) of 4 kg COD/m3.d. With low strength leachate (COD = 1500-3300 mg/L) from the Brock West Landfill, and a COD/SO4 ratio < or = 1, SRB became predominant. In these anaerobic filters in which SRB were predominant, the SRB reduced the COD as well as the MPB could. Sulphide inhibition did not take place at any loading in units treating low strength leachate. Consequently, both SRB and MPB should function at COD/SO4 ratios between 1 and 3. About 60% COD removal was achieved at a loading of 2.8 kg COD/m3.d and a COD/SO4 ratio of 1.0. However at a loading of 6 kg COD/m3.d only 27% COD removal was achieved, all of it through the sulphate-reduction pathway. These OLR values are comparable to those applied in systems where methanogenesis was dominant. It was also observed that once the methanogens were established in the units, it was not possible to displace them completely. However, where methanogenesis had not been previously established, it was found that sulphate-reduction could be the sole pathway for COD removal. From this study, it can be concluded that there is no advantage to the sulphate-reduction pathway in the anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate. The other options for increasing the loadings, i.e. the use of high surface/volume filter media (to achieve higher biomass concentrations) or high rate systems are likely to be more successful.
Laboratory and pilot scale studies on the biological solubilization of metals from undigested raw sludge were carried out using elemental sulphur as the energy source. Metals (Cu, Zn, Ni and Cd), pH, sulfate and indicator bacteria [total coliforms (TC) faecal coliforms (FC) and faecal streptococci (FS)] were used to evaluate the system effectiveness. This paper does not report the detailed design and operational data of the pilot plant (available elsewhere [1]) but focuses on the biological tests carried out at the Main Wastewater Treatment Plant in Toronto from July to December, 1997. Since the indicator bacteria are injured from exposure to low pH and potentially toxic metal concentrations, improved alternative methods for their enumeration and their ability to repair acid-metal induced injury in a resuscitation medium (CASO tryptone soya broth) were also investigated. Resuscitation was not effective in repairing cells injured during bacterial leaching. The MPN technique (using lauryl tryptose broth) for enumerating indicator bacteria (total coliforms) gave higher counts and was therefore superior to the spread plate technique (using m-Endo agar) in recovering bacteria from acidic leached sludge (biosolids). However, the coliform bacterial counts from raw sludge were similar by the two methods. This study indicated that the biological solubilization process could significantly reduce the pathogenic indicators. Concentrations of TC, FC and FS in the leached biosolids from the solubilization tank were lower than concentrations in the raw sludge by 4 to 6 orders of magnitude and the finished product (biosolids) met US. EPA requirements for pathogen and metal concentrations for Class A biosolids to be used on agricultural land.
A biological metal extraction (bacterial leaching) process has been developed to extract metals from sludge. Although the removal of metals from sludge is a significant step, any biological hazard must be eliminated before the sludge can be used on land. Earlier studies established that indicator bacteria were not reduced significantly during bacterial leaching. Whether pathogens also would survive or be destroyed in the acidic environment of the bacterial leaching process was not determined. This study was intended to answer this question. A series of batch units performing bacterial leaching was operated with varying sludge concentrations spiked with attenuated Salmonella typhimurium. The concentrations of Salmonella typhimurium and total coliforms in the sludge were determined. Results showed that, although the Salmonella typhimurium population was eliminated within 7 hours (at pH 4.0, an aeration rate of 100 mL of air per minute per litre of sludge, and at a room temperature of 20 to 25 °C), the total coliforms persisted during the leaching period of 10 days. The inactivation of the Salmonella typhimurium appeared to be independent of the suspended solids concentration in the leaching units, unlike the survival of total coliforms which was found to be a function of the suspended solids concentration. At suspended solids concentrations of about 40 g/L, the total coliforms persisted, whereas after 5 days, coliforms were not detected in units containing about 10 g SS/L.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.