Objective To assess the efficacy of wearing a face mask to prevent peritonitis during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) bag exchange. Setting Renal unit at a university hospital. Patients Two groups of patients on CAPD were compared: those performing bag exchange with ( n = 24) and those without a face mask ( n = 40). Outcomes Occurrence of first episode of peritonitis and total number of episodes. Results No difference was found between groups with respect to probability of developing the first episode of peritonitis ( p = 0.757). Patients holding university degrees had evidence of protection, with borderline significance [relative risk (RR) 0.52; confidence interval (CI) 95%, 0.23 – 1.18; p = 0.109]. Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis also demonstrated a significant protective factor for patients with university level education (RR 0.42; CI 95%, 0.18 – 0.98; p = 0.04). Incidence of peritonitis was not significantly different between groups: with-mask group had 1.0 episode/year, and without-mask group had 0.94 episodes/year. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly identified agent. Staphylococcus aureus was found more frequently in the with-mask group ( p = 0.003). Peritonitis due to Streptococcus viridans and Enterococci were detected only in the without-mask group. Conclusion The current study suggests that routine use of face masks during CAPD bag exchanges may be unnecessary and could be discontinued.
Third International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine for Latin America plays a critical role in the inflammatory response and, potentially, a polymorphism in IRAK1 may alter the immune response impacting clinical outcome. P2 Gene expression and intracellular NF-κ κB activation after HMGB1 and LPS stimuli in neutrophils from septic patients
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.