Introduction
Sacral neuromodulation is an established intervention for faecal incontinence (FI). This investigation aimed to determine the relationship between patient satisfaction and (1) device status (active/inactive) and (2) long-term functional outcomes.
Methods
Patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for at least 5 years reported bowel habits, FI severity, and impact on quality of life via bowel diaries, St. Marks incontinence score, and the Manchester Health Questionnaire at baseline and follow-up. On all measures, lower scores represent favourable outcomes. Satisfaction since treatment initiation and over the preceding 2 weeks was assessed using visual analogue scales (0%-100%). Individuals with inactive devices were awaiting battery revision surgery due to service delays encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results
In total, 74/110 eligible individuals completed follow-up measures (median: 130 months). Median overall satisfaction was high at 80% (IQR:60%-95%, n=70). Median two-week satisfaction was 75% (IQR:40%-90%, n=50) for individuals with active devices, and 20% (IQR:0%-45%, n=17) for those with inactive devices. Between-group differences were significant for two-week satisfaction (p<0.001), but not overall satisfaction (p=0.114). Two-week satisfaction was negatively correlated with all outcome measures (FI episodes: -0.46, faecal urgency episodes: -0.52, St. Marks incontinence score: -0.68, Manchester Health Questionnaire: -0.62 [all p<0.001]). However, of 12 individuals with active devices who did not meet the conventional treatment success threshold (50% FI reduction), 4 still reported ≥80% two-week satisfaction.
Conclusion
Standardised outcome measures reflect subjective satisfaction but cannot be used alone to assess positive outcomes as perceived by patients. Timely device revision is imperative for continued success of treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.