Background Numerous studies have demonstrated that the increasing racial and ethnic diversity of the US population benefits from access to healthcare providers from similarly diverse backgrounds. Physician assistant (PA) education programs have striven to increase the diversity of the profession, which is predominantly non-Hispanic white, by focusing on admitting students from historically excluded populations. However, strategies such as holistic admissions are predicated on the existence of racially and ethnically diverse applicant pools. While studies have examined correlates of matriculation into a medical education program, this study looks earlier in the pipeline and investigates whether applicant – not matriculant – pool diversity varies among PA programs with different characteristics. Methods Data were drawn from the 2017–2018 Central Application Service for PAs admissions cycle. Applications to programs with pre-professional tracks and applicants missing race/ethnicity data were excluded, resulting in data from 26,600 individuals who applied to 189 PA programs. We summarized the racial and ethnic diversity of each program’s applicant pools using: [1]the proportion of underrepresented minority (URM) students, [2]the proportion of students with backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (URiM), and [3]Simpson’s diversity index of a 7-category race/ethnicity combination. We used multiple regressions to model each diversity metric as a function of program characteristics including class size, accreditation status, type of institution, and other important features. Results Regardless of the demographic diversity metric examined, we found that applicant diversity was higher among provisionally accredited programs and those receiving more applications. We also identified trends suggesting that programs in more metropolitan areas were able to attract more diverse applicants. Programs that did not require the GRE were also able to attract more diverse applicants when considering the URM and SDI metrics, though results for URiM were not statistically significant. Conclusions Our findings provide insights into modifiable (e.g., GRE requirement) and non-modifiable (e.g., provisionally accredited) program characteristics that are associated with more demographically diverse applicant pools.
Background Complex cases of older adults suffering from multimorbidity are continuing to increase in number. The integrated care team, overseen by a consultant geriatrician, aims to facilitate the management of stable complex cases in the community. Patient care is largely affected by their support system at home; therefore, it is of great importance to ensure that the patient’s primary carer is receiving the support they require to facilitate the older patients’ management in the community. Our aim is to assess carer stress levels before and after Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) integrated care intervention. Methods Study Population were carers of patients identified as complex cases by the integrated care team. Caregiver stress index was administered during the initial assessment and on the closing of active cases. The maximum score on this index is 13 with high stress classified as >7. Scores were added to a spreadsheet. This spreadsheet was reviewed, and relevant data was collated. One year assessed March 2021- March 2022. Results Carer stress information was collected on 62 of 112 identified complex cases (55%). Of these 55 of 96 individual patients were represented (57%). Average age 82 years old. 65% female and 35%, male. Range of carer stress scores observed 0- to 12. Of the 62 cases, 85% (53 cases) had a reduction in carer stress post-intervention(p<0.01). Of these 65% had a reduction below 7 (p<0.01). Mean score improvement 7. No carer stress indices disimproved post-treatment. Conclusion Multidisciplinary, patient-centred community care has a clear positive impact on the patient carer. Improvements in carer stress scores could be further evaluated as to the benefits of specific interventions in time. In future, a more large-scale collection and interpretation of data would need to occur for a more conclusive positive impact of the community based integrated care team to be confirmed.
Background Community based integrated care Multi-Disciplinary Teams (MDT) are a mainstay for future management of older adults. They have evolved to meet the needs of many different sub-types of clinical cases in the community. Complex Cases, are patients over 65 who reside within the catchment area, suffer from at least 2 frailty traits, and would be at increased risk of crisis emergency department (ED) attendance. Can the crisis ED attendances be prevented by integrated care team intervention? Methods The study population comprised adults identified as complex cases as per integrated care team standard operating procedure. Collated data was reviewed, and electronic medical records assessed as to whether any complex cases had been admitted within 30 days, 60 days, and 1 year of community team review. The study time frame was March 2021- to March 2022. As many patients have more than one unique identifying number, all patients were double-checked with an assessment based on their name and date of birth. Results 112 complex cases were identified within one year, and 96 individual patients were represented. Average age 83 years old. 65% female and 35% male. 11% were admitted to hospital within 30 days, a further 6% were admitted within 60 days and by one year 30% of reviewed complex cases had been admitted to hospital. Conclusion In one year 70% of complex cases have been successfully maintained in the community. This has been achieved based on a multidisciplinary-based, patient-centred care approach. Given that 53% of hospital inpatient bed days are occupied by those over 65. This review concurs with previous research suggesting that an increase in community based integrated care teams is justified and should the aim for a fully staffed team per 150,000 patients over 65 come to fruition more than two-thirds of even the most complicated geriatric cases could be managed in the community.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.