EAR does not appear to be superior to ISR. The risk of RI increased with the length of follow-up, irrespective of the treatment modality. Life-long surveillance is mandatory. Our results with endovascular sealing of SAEF should be considered a bridge to open repair.

Background. Thrombosis of the central veins is one of the most frequent complications of implanted venous access devices. Among the first cases occurring in our patients, most were associated with left‐sided placement of the ports, with catheter tips lying against the external wall in the upper half of the superior vena cava. Some chest radiographs showed lateromediastinal opacities centered on the catheter tip, suggesting a vessel injury. This position allows a narrow contact between the catheter tip and the vessel wall, thus endothelial injuries might result from mechanical and chemical attack. Methods. To assess the role of catheter position, we reviewed the routine chest radiographs of 379 patients who received chemotherapy through venous access devices and were followed up at our department between December 1985 and December 1990. Four groups (upper left, upper right, lower left, and lower right) were defined according to the level of the catheter tip (innominate veins or upper half of the vena cava versus lower half of the vena cava or auricula) and to the side of port implantation. Results. Ten patients developed symptomatic venous thrombosis (superior vena cava in 9 patient, left subclavian vein in 1 patient). A strong correlation existed between catheter position and incidence of thrombosis: upper left, 8/28 (28.6%); upper right, 1/33 (3%); lower right, 1/68 (1.5%); and lower left, 0/250. Since 1988, we have insisted on replacement of malpositioned catheters, and we have observed fewer thromboses (2/191 versus 8/188). Conclusions. The current study suggests that patients with left‐sided ports and catheter tips lying in the upper part of the vena cava are at high risk for severe thrombotic complications.

Abdominal aortic endograft explantation for infection is high risk and associated with graft-enteric fistula in one-third of the cases. Larger multicenter studies are needed to better understand the risk factors and to improve preventive measures at index EVAR and during follow-up.

Anatomy textbooks say that the motor branch of the long head of the triceps brachii (LHT) arises from the radial nerve. Some clinical observations of traumatic injuries of the axillary nerve with associated paralysis of the LHT have suggested that the motor branch of the LHT may arise from the axillary nerve. This anatomic study was performed, using both cadaver anatomical dissections and a surgical study, to determine the exact origin of the motor branch of the LHT. From the adult cadaver specimens (group I), 20 posterior cords were dissected from 10 subjects (eight embalmed, two fresh) using 3.5x magnification. The axillary nerve was followed from its onset to the posteromedial part of the surgical neck of the humerus and the radial nerve. We looked for the origin of the proximal branch of the LHT by a meticulous double anterior and posterior dissection. From the surgical group (group II), 15 posterior cords were dissected from 15 patients suffering from a C5-C6 injured paralysis, without paralysis of the LHT. During the surgical procedure, we looked for the origins of the motor branch of the LHT with a nerve stimulator. In group I, the motor branch of the LHT arose in 13 cases from the axillary nerve near its origin, in five cases from the terminal division of the posterior cord itself, and in two cases from the posterior cord 10 mm before its terminal division into the radial and axillary nerves. In no case did we find the motor branch of the LHT arising from the radial nerve. In eight cases, we found some accessory branches that arose near the principal branch. In group II, the motor branch of the LHT arose in 11 cases from the axillary nerve near its origin and in four cases from the terminal division of the posterior cord itself. The motor branch of the LHT never originated from the radial nerve. In four cases, we found some accessory branches that arose near the principal branch of the LHT. These results reveal that the motor branch of the LHT seems to originate most often from the axillary nerve. This contribution could be relevant for surgical treatment of traumatic nerve injuries.