Two recent reports of the same combination chemotherapy program, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, methotrexate, cytarabine, vincristine, bleomycin, and prednisone (ProMACE-CytaBOM), in similar subsets of patients with advanced-stage aggressive-histology lymphoma used two different methods to report the actual dose-intensity (DI) data. One method treats DI as a property of a particular cycle of treatment within the entire population that received that cycle. The other treats DI as a characteristic of a particular patient's entire treatment course. We have applied both methods to the same set of data and provide evidence that the latter method is preferable for at least two reasons: (1) it more accurately reflects actual DI by clearly incorporating the duration of the actual treatment course and, thus, can be used to compare the administration of same or related regimens to distinct patient populations; and (2) it allows assignment of a numerical value to an individual patient's treatment course or a group of patients' treatment courses such that DI can be examined for its impact on treatment outcome just like any other prognostic factor. The observed differences in treatment outcome between the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) studies are not clearly related to differences in distribution of clinical prognostic factors in the two study populations. The differences in methods of reporting DI prohibit evaluation of the influence of dose-related variables on outcome in the two studies. Adoption of a standard method of calculating and reporting DI data would facilitate evaluation of the prognostic significance of DI.
When patients with aggressive lymphoma present with intraabdominal disease, a stable residual mass is frequently detected radiographically at the time of the clinical complete remission. To discern the optimal management for this clinical problem, we reviewed 241 patients with aggressive lymphoma treated at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) from 1977 to 1986. Seventy-two/241 patients (30%) had an abdominal mass at diagnosis and 29/72 (40%) were left with a radiographically detectable residual mass at clinical complete remission. The likelihood of a residual mass was much higher for patients with bulky disease (P2 less than .0003) (two-tailed test [P2]). Twenty-nine patients had radiologically stable residual masses after therapy, and of 22 (76%) with pathologic evaluations, 21 had negative specimens (95%) and one was positive (5%). None of the patients with negative pathologic evaluation has relapsed in the abdominal site (median follow-up, 31 months). Seven patients were observed clinically without laparotomy: five are alive, without evidence of disease, at 2 to 9 years; two relapsed with disseminated disease within 2 months of chemotherapy. Initial tumor size and size of the residual mass did not correlate with residual disease, since residual masses identified by radiographic examination did not usually harbor viable lymphoma cells. Aspiration cytology was negative for residual tumor in 15/16 cases. One negative result was not confirmed at laparotomy, presumably due to sampling error. The one positive aspiration was followed by a negative laparotomy, possibly due to subsequent tumor necrosis. Restaging laparotomy has a low yield. In most patients with aggressive lymphoma who have otherwise completely responded to carefully administered full-dose combination chemotherapy, stable residual abdominal masses can be closely followed clinically without surgical exploration.
Consolidation of patients with metastatic or high-risk localized pediatric sarcomas with 8 Gy TBI plus ABMT has failed to improve the outcome of this group of patients. Metastatic disease at diagnosis continues to confer the poorest prognosis. New therapeutic strategies are needed to consolidate more effectively the remissions that can be achieved in the majority of these patients.
Seventeen patients with peripheral neuroepithelioma were treated with an intensive chemotherapy regimen of vincristine, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cyclophosphamide (VADRIAC) in combination with radiation therapy. Fifteen patients with stage III (seven) or stage IV (eight) at presentation were treated on a more intensive regimen including total body irradiation (TBI) (8 Gy). Two patients with stage I (one) or II (one) disease received a less intensive chemotherapy regimen of VADRIAC. Therapy was completed within 6 to 7 months in all patients. The disease arose in the chest wall in 12 patients, pelvis in three patients, and extremity in two patients. Sixteen of the 17 (94%) patients achieved a complete remission. With a median follow-up of 18 months, ten patients remain in complete remission with an actuarial survival of 68% and an actuarial relapse-free survival of 56% at 12 months. On the basis of our initial experience with this tumor, we believe that peripheral neuroepithelioma is a chemoresponsive and radioresponsive tumor.
Thirty-one previously untreated patients with Ewing's sarcoma were treated with an intensive chemotherapy program of vincristine, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cyclosphosphamide (VADRIAC) in combination with radiation therapy to the primary site (greater than 50 Gy) and bone metastases (45 to 50 Gy). An intensified regimen with one further cycle of chemotherapy (VADRIAC), total body irradiation (TBI), and autologous bone marrow transplantation was given to patients with primary tumors of the pelvis, humerus, femur, and chest wall without metastases and to all patients with metastases at diagnosis. Patients with primary tumors of the distal extremity and other sites without metastases at diagnosis were treated on a less intensive chemotherapy regimen of VADRIAC without the intensification. Therapy was completed within 6 to 7 months in all patients. Thirteen patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis; only two of these had the lung as the sole site of metastatic disease. Eighteen patients had no evidence of metastatic disease at diagnosis: ten of these patients had tumors that arose in central axis and proximal extremity sites, and eight had tumors that arose in distal extremity and other sites. Thirty of the 31 patients achieved a complete remission, although two patients underwent amputation: one before chemotherapy and radiation and one after chemotherapy and radiation because of persistent local disease. Seventeen remain in their first complete remission at a median time on study of 30 months and a median time after completion of therapy of 24 months. Fourteen patients have relapsed (13) or progressed (1): ten in metastatic sites and four in the primary site. One patient had persistent local disease after radiation requiring amputation. Nine of the 13 patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis have relapsed compared with five of the 18 patients without metastatic disease. For the entire group, the actuarial survival is 78% (65% to 87%) at 30 months, and the actuarial disease-free survival is 58% (46% to 69%) at 30 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.