No abstract

The relationship between broiler breast meat color and pH, moisture content, water-holding capacity (WHC), and emulsification capacity (EC) was investigated. In each of three replicate trials, fillets were collected from three different commercial processing plants according to breast meat lightness (L*) values as follows: lighter than normal (light, L* > 53), normal (48 < L* < 53), and darker than normal (dark, L* < 46). Color values of lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) were measured at 0 and 24 h after collection. Fillets were then ground and homogenized prior to determining color, pH, moisture, WHC, and EC of the ground meat. There was a significant difference among the three color groups (light, normal, and dark) in L*, a*, pH, WHC, and EC. The L* values of whole raw breast fillets had significant negative correlation coefficients with ground meat EC (-0.9237), pH (-0.9610), and a* (-0.6540). Emulsification capacity had significant positive correlations with pH (0.9572) and water-holding capacity (0.7080). WHC had significant correlations with a* (0.8143), moisture (-0.7647), and pH (0.7963). Lighter-than-normal meat was associated with low pH, high moisture, low EC, and low WHC. These results indicate that wide differences in raw breast meat color exist and that these differences may be used by poultry further processors as an indicator of fillets with altered functional properties.

Four experiments were conducted to determine the range of breast meat color variation observed in commercial processing plants and its relationship to muscle pH and texture. Boneless, skinless breast fillets were collected weekly from the deboning lines of five commercial processing plants over a 4-wk period. Plant personnel selected breast fillets based on their appearance as being "lighter than normal," "normal," or "darker than normal" in color. Five representative fillets of each appearance classification were transported to a central laboratory for analyses of visual score (1 to 5 with 1 = light, 3 = normal, or 5 = dark), instrumental color, muscle pH, and Allo-Kramer shear (n = 300). Visual scores, lightness (L*), redness (a*), and pH were different (P<0.05) among the three appearance groups, with no significant differences in yellowness (b*). Visual scores averaged 2.4, 3.0, and 3.6, L* was 48.8, 45.6, and 43.1, and pH was 5.63, 5.70, and 5.81 for the lighter, normal, and darker fillets, respectively. There were no significant effects of color group on breast meat texture. Correlations between the color values and pH, however, were all highly significant. These results not only indicate that there are wide variations in breast meat color in commercial production, but they also demonstrate a strong relationship between breast meat color and muscle pH.

Experiments were conducted to compare the shelf-life of dark-colored and light-colored broiler breast meat. In each of three trials, 100 breast fillets were obtained from a commercial processing plant and subjectively categorized as "dark" or "light". The 100 fillets were then objectively evaluated for C.I.E. color values (lightness, redness, and yellowness). The fillets were separated into five storage groups, with each group containing 10 dark and 10 light fillets, and the fillets were held at 3 C for 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 d. On each sampling day, fillets were evaluated in duplicate for psychrotrophic plate count (PPC), capacitance detection time (CDT), pH, and subjective odor evaluation. Dark fillets had significantly (P < 0.05) lower lightness values (L*), higher redness values (a*), lower yellowness values (b*), and higher pH values. Regression coefficients for odor scores resulted in darker fillets having significantly (P < 0.05) higher slopes than lighter-colored fillets even though intercept values were similar. Significant correlations existed between pH and color as well as odor, CDT, and PPC. These data suggest that darker broiler breast meat fillets have a shorter shelf-life than lighter breast fillets; the shorter shelf-life may be due to differences in pH.

Experiments were conducted to compare the chemical composition of broiler breast meat that was naturally lighter than normal, normal, and darker than normal. In each of three separate replicated trials (wk), fillets were obtained from three commercial processing plants. Approximately 25 fillets of each color group were selected based on International Commission on Illumination (CIE) lightness values as follows: lighter than normal (L* > 53), normal (48 < L* < 51), and darker than normal (L* < 46). The fillets from each replicate, plant, and color group were ground and mixed together, and samples for the 27 treatment groups subjected to color, pH, and chemical analyses (protein, ash, moisture, total lipids, iron, glycogen, and fatty acids profile). The whole fillets had significantly different color values for the three color groups at 0 and 24 h prior to grinding. Of the ground meat samples, there were significant treatment and plant differences in composition. There were no color treatment effects on moisture, lipid, glycogen, iron, ash, or fatty acid ratios. Meat from the light group had significantly lower protein values than the normal or dark meat and lower ash than the dark group. The light group also had significantly higher levels of C16:1 and lower levels of C18:0 and C20:4 fatty acids than the dark group. Among the three plants, there were significant effects for breast meat color and composition. Results indicated that, although plant had more effect on composition, differences by color group might indicate that extreme variation in color may be due to long-term genetic factors as well as short-term antemortem stress.

A total of three experiments were conducted to compare physical and microbiological properties of raw and marinated broiler breast fillets selected as being either lighter or darker than normal. Visibly light- and dark-colored breast fillets were divided into marinated and control groups, and vacuum-tumbled for 20 min at 4 C under 80 kPa pressure. Breast fillets from the four treatment groups were evaluated for shear values, raw and cooked meat pH, drip-loss, cook-loss, water-holding capacity, and 7 d psychrotrophic count. The light-colored fillets were significantly lighter, less red, and more yellow than the dark fillets. Lightness values increased when fillets were marinated. Moreover, the light fillets had a lower pH than dark fillets. The pH values of raw and cooked breast meat were related to meat color but not marination. Dark-colored fillets had significantly higher marination pick-up and a higher fraction of bound moisture and significantly lower drip and cook-loss. No differences were observed in shear values between color or marination treatments. There were no significant differences in psychrotrophic plate counts (PPC) or capacitance detection times (CDT) due to color or treatment at Day 1. After 7 d of storage at 4 C, PPC was significantly lower for marinated samples. No correlations were observed between pH and PPC, CDT, or odor. Based on these differences in physical and microbiological properties, further processors may consider separating breast fillets according to color.

Three replicate trials were conducted to determine the influence of raw breast meat color and pH on subsequent cooked meat color and pH. In each trial, approximately 50 breast fillets were obtained from a commercial processing plant based on being either normal, lighter than normal, or darker than normal. Color (L* = lightness, a* = redness, and b* = yellowness) of each fillet was determined in triplicate on the underside surface of the fillet (to avoid scalding effects), and the pH was determined on a tissue sample removed from the posterior portion of each fillet. Fillets were then cooked in steam at 98 C for 20 min and cooled to room temperature, and a second sample was removed from the posterior section for cooked meat pH. Cooked meat color was measured on an exposed surface, to avoid cooking-related discoloration. The data were subjected to linear regression analysis to determine the relationship between raw and cooked values. Results indicated a significant linear relationship between raw and cooked values for each color parameter as well as pH. Model R2 values were 0.43, 0.40, 0.64, and 0.78 for L*, a*, b*, and pH, respectively. There were also significant linear relationships between raw meat L* and raw muscle pH (R2 = 0.59) as well as cooked meat L* and raw meat pH (R2 = 0.36). These results indicate that raw breast meat color and pH affect cooked breast meat color and pH but that cooking reduces the degree of color variation. Moreover, cooked meat lightness is more closely associated with raw breast meat pH than with cooked meat pH.

No abstract