Several models for predicting dry matter intake (DMI) of replacement dairy heifers have been developed; however, only a few have been evaluated using data from heifers of different breeds raised under tropical conditions. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the DMI equations for dairy heifers managed under tropical conditions. A total of 230 treatment means from 61 studies using dairy heifers (n = 1513 heifers, average body weight = 246 kg) were used. The animals were grouped into two groups based on their genetics: (1) Bos taurus (Holstein, Jersey, Brown Swiss, and Holstein × Jersey) and (2) crossbred (Bos taurus × Bos indicus). Seven previously published DMI equations (HH, HHJ, QUI, STA, 2001 NRC, OFLin, and OFNLin) for heifers were evaluated using mean bias, slope bias, mean squared prediction errors (MSPE) and its decomposition, and other model evaluation statistics. For Bos taurus heifers, our results indicated that OFNLin and HHJ had lower mean bias (0.13 and 0.16 kg/d, respectively) than other models. There was no significant slope or mean bias for HHJ and OFNLin (p > 0.05), indicating agreement between the observed and predicted DMI values. All other models had a significant mean bias (p < 0.05), whereas the QUI model also presented a significant slope bias (p < 0.02). For crossbred heifers, the STA equation was the only one that did not present mean and slope bias significance (p > 0.05). All other DMI models had significant mean bias when evaluated using crossbred data (p < 0.04), and QUI, OFLin, and OFNLin also presented significant slope bias (p < 0.01). Based on our results, predictions from OFNLin and HHJ best represented the observed DMI of Bos taurus heifers (MSPE ≤ 1.25 kg2/d2, mean bias ≤ 0.16 kg/d), whereas STA was the best model for crossbred heifers (MSPE = 1.25 kg2/d2, mean bias = 0.09 kg/d). These findings indicate that not all available models are adequate for estimating the DMI of dairy heifers managed under a tropical climate, with HHJ and OFNLin for Bos taurus and STA for crossbreds being the most suitable models for DMI prediction. There is evidence that models from Bos taurus heifers could be used to estimate the DMI of heifers under tropical conditions. For heifer ration formulation is necessary to consider that DMI is influenced by breed, diet, management, and climate. Future work should also include animal genetic and environmental variables for the prediction of DMI in dairy heifers.

No abstract

Few studies have been published on the body growth of replacement dairy heifers from Jersey (JER) and Holstein × Gyr (H × G) breeds, as most of them have focused on Holstein (HOL) heifers. In addition, HOL genetics vary significantly across countries. Our goal was to study the body growth curves of 3 distinct genetic groups of heifers (HOL, H × G, and JER) using data from Brazilian commercial dairy herds. Heart girth [to estimate body weight (BW)], hip height (HH), and withers height (WH) were measured. Weights (heifers and cows) and heights (only heifers) were collected from animals in several herds for each genetic group to model and describe the growth rates, mature body weight (MBW), weights, and heights for the recommended age at first breeding (RAFB) and first calving (RAFC). The RAFB values for HOL, H × G, and JER cattle were 15, 18, and 13 mo, respectively. The RAFC values for HOL, H × G, and JER cattle were 24, 27, and 22 mo, respectively. Data were obtained from 18 dairy farms located in 4 Brazilian states and analyzed using nonlinear modeling. Data were collected from 2,266 animals: 878 HOL, 610 H × G, and 778 JER cattle. We observed different body growth patterns in each genetic group. Jersey cattle matured earlier than HOL and H × G, especially for BW and HH. Mature BW of the HOL, H × G, and JER cattle was 681, 607, and 440 kg, respectively. All genetic groups reached the recommended BW at RAFB. However, the genetic groups did not reach the recommended BW at RAFC. Average daily weight gain from weaning to RAFB was 0.84, 0.53, and 0.54 kg/d for HOL, H × G, and JER cattle, respectively. Average daily gain from RAFB to RAFC was 0.53, 0.42, and 0.48 kg/d for HOL, H × G, and JER cattle, respectively. The HH at RAFB and RAFC were 130 and 139 cm for HOL, 130 and 137 cm for H × G, and 114 and 124 cm for JER. Withers height at RAFB and RAFC were 125 and 134 cm, 125 and 134 cm, and 110 and 121 cm for HOL, H × G, and JER cattle, respectively. In general, the rearing practices were adequate to reach the recommended BW at RAFB but below the recommended BW at RAFC for all genetic groups. In addition, each genetic group demonstrated different body growth patterns, especially for BW.

No abstract

No abstract