Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is an antimicrobial agent recognized for its disinfectant properties. In this study, the sanitizing effects of ClO2 solutions against Salmonella enterica and Erwinia carotovora in water, on tomato surfaces, and between loads of tomatoes were evaluated. In water, ClO2 at 5, 10, and 20 ppm caused a > or = 5-log reduction of S. enterica within 6, 4, and 2 s, respectively. Higher lethality was observed with E. carotovora; a 5-log reduction was achieved after only 2 s with 10 ppm ClO2. On fruit surfaces, however, the sanitizing effects were compromised. A full minute of contact with ClO2 at 20 and 10 ppm was required to achieve a 5-log reduction in S. enterica and E. carotovora counts, respectively, on freshly spot-inoculated tomatoes. On inoculated fruit surfaces, populations decreased > 3 log CFU/cm2 during desiccation at 24 +/- 1 degrees C for 24 h. Populations of air-dried Salmonella and Erwinia were not significantly reduced (P > 0.05) by ClO2 at < or = 20 ppm after 1 min. Either wet or dry inoculum of these two pathogens could contaminate immersion water, which in turn can cross-contaminate a subsequent load of clean fruit and water. ClO2 at 5 ppm used for immersion effectively prevented cross-contamination. Pathogen contamination during fruit handling is best prevented with an effective disinfectant. Once a load of fruit is contaminated with pathogens, even a proven disinfectant such as ClO2 cannot completely eliminate such contaminants, particularly when they are in a dehydrated state on fruit.

Chlorine dioxide (ClO(2)) is an antimicrobial agent available for commercial produce washing. This study examined the efficacy of ClO(2) at 5 parts per million (ppm) during spray washing of tomatoes (5.0 ml/s per fruit) for preventing Salmonella enterica transfer from inoculated roller brushes to fruit and wash runoff. Furthermore, the sanitizing effects of ClO(2) during spray washing at low and high flow rates (5.0 and 9.3 ml/s per fruit, respectively) on tomato surfaces (nonstem scar areas) with either newly introduced (wet) or overnight air-dried Salmonella inocula were investigated. Salmonella transfer from contaminated brushes to fruit surfaces was reduced 2.1 +/- 0.6 or 4.7 +/- 0.2 log cycles after spray washing with water for 40 s or with the ClO(2) solution for 10 s, respectively. Cross-contamination of Salmonella from brushes to wash runoff during fruit washing for 60 s decreased 5.9 +/- 0.3 log cycles when ClO(2) was used. Fruit washing using contaminated brushes and low flow-rate washing with either water or ClO(2) solution for 10 s reduced newly introduced Salmonella on fruit surfaces by 1.7 +/- 0.6 or 5.1 +/- 0.3 log cycles, respectively. For fruit surfaces with air-dried inocula, washing with water and using uncontaminated brushes for 10 to 40 s reduced Salmonella by 3.2 +/- 0.3 to 3.4 +/- 0.4 log cycles; and the reduction was significantly improved by using ClO(2), high flow rate, or a longer washing time. Washing with ClO(2) at tested flow rates for 10 to 60 s resulted in a 4.4 +/- 0.6 to 5.2 +/- 0.1 log reduction of air-dried Salmonella on fruit surfaces.

The effectiveness of washing treatments to decontaminate orange fruit surfaces inoculated with Escherichia coli was evaluated. Washing on roller brushes with fruit cleaners or sanitizers followed by potable water rinse reduced E. coli by 1.9 to 3.5 log cycles. Prewetting fruit for 30 s before washing provided no significant benefit in most cases. Additional sanitizing treatments either with chlorine or acid sanitizers did not enhance the results of alkaline washing. In general, high pH washing solutions (pH 11.8) applied with an adequate spray volume effectively reduced the surface contamination of fruit that lowered the microbial load of fresh juice as well.

We determined the bactericidal activity of surface applied waxes on oranges. Effective bactericidal activity of combined alkali and heat treatments was observed on both glass slides and orange fruit surfaces. A five log reduction of Escherichia coli was attained by dipping inoculated glass slides in heated (Ն50ЊC) alkaline ( pH 10) wax solution for 4 min. At pH 11, dipping at Ն50ЊC for Ն2 min achieved similar bactericidal effects. On the fruit surface, wax treatments were effective at the non-stem scar area. Thus, applied fruit waxes may be useful on raw agricultural commodities to reduce surface microbial contaminants.

No abstract