No abstract

No abstract

The following new U–Pb dates are provided for zircons from volcanic and intrusive rocks of the Avalon Terrane of Newfoundland: Burin Group ophiolite (Wandsworth pegmatitic gabbro), [Formula: see text]; Marystown Group ash-flow tuff, [Formula: see text]; Rock Harbour Group rhyolite clast in conglomerate, [Formula: see text]; Harbour Main Group ash-flow tuff, [Formula: see text]; Harbour Main Group flow-banded rhyolite, [Formula: see text]; porphyritic rhyolite plug intruding Harbour Main Group, 632 ± 2 Ma; Holyrood Granite, [Formula: see text]; rhyolite dyke, Harbour Main Group, [Formula: see text]; and welded ash-flow tuff, "Grand Beach porphyry," [Formula: see text]. All of the dated zircons are simple, single-age populations with no trace of inheritance. These dates confirm that the ophiolitic Burin Group represents an older and separate event that correlates precisely with the Bou Azzer ophiolite of Morocco and that the Rock Harbour Group does not represent continental volcanism that preceded that event. The Rock Harbour, Marystown, and Harbour Main groups and the Holyrood Granite (632–608 Ma) are all part of the younger 650–550 Ma pulse of Pan-African orogenesis that affected a broad area extending through Africa, Asia, western Europe, southern England and Wales, and eastern North America. However, a shortage of high-precision dates throughout these terranes precludes very exact correlations and thus very exact interpretations in terms of specific tectonic or magmatic events. Although these dates require some revisions in the stratigraphy of the Newfoundland Avalon Terrane, they do not support suggestions that the Avalon Terrane comprises a "collage of suspect terranes." The age of the Grand Beach porphyry (394 Ma) places it squarely with the Acadian granites of the Appalachians and removes it from consideration as part of the Marystown Group.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The new process of 'Stationary Shoulder' Friction Stir Welding (SSFSW) has been directly compared to conventional (Friction Stir Welding) using welds produced in a high strength AA7050-T7651 aluminium aerospace alloy. The process window for each approach was first compared using torque -rotation rate decay curves. Under optimum process conditions, SSFSW had a ~ 30% lower heat input than FSW and the stationary shoulder resulted in narrower welds with a reduced heat affected zone (HAZ) width. The SSFSW welds also had more uniform through thickness properties and performed better than conventional FSWs in cross-weld tensile tests. In addition it is demonstrated that SSFSW process resulted in a far superior surface finish, although the stationary shoulder lead to surface 'speed cracking' under certain welding conditions. The reasons for these benefits are discussed aided by thermal and hardness modelling.

No abstract