Cell transplantation is a promising experimental treatment for spinal cord injury. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood in promoting functional recovery when transplanted after a contusion spinal cord injury. Female Wistar rats (12 weeks old) were submitted to spinal injury with a MASCIS impactor and divided into 4 groups: control, surgical control, spinal cord injury, and one cell-treated lesion group. Mononuclear cells from umbilical cord blood of human male neonates were transplanted in two experiments: a) 1 h after surgery, into the injury site at a concentration of 5 x 106 cells diluted in 10 µL 0.9% NaCl (N = 8-10 per group); b) into the cisterna magna, 9 days after lesion at a concentration of 5 x 106 cells diluted in 150 µL 0.9% NaCl (N = 12-14 per group). The transplanted animals were immunosuppressed with cyclosporin-A (10 mg/kg per day). The BBB scale was used to evaluate motor behavior and the injury site was analyzed with immunofluorescent markers to label human transplanted cells, oligodendrocytes, neurons, and astrocytes. Spinal cord injury rats had 25% loss of cord tissue and cell treatment did not affect lesion extension. Transplanted cells survived in the injured area for 6 weeks after the procedure and both transplanted groups showed better motor recovery than the untreated ones (P < 0.05). The transplantation of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood promoted functional recovery with no evidence of cell differentiation.
BackgroundEnd-of-treatment images of infections after intra-abdominal infection could increase costs. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are used to define and predict the evolution of infectious diseases. The aim of this study was to describe clinical outcomes of adult patients with end-of-treatment images or CRP and ESR follow-up, during treatment of organ/space (OS) (intra-abdominal) surgical site infection (SSI).MethodsObservational retrospective cohort. Hospitalized patients older than 16 years were included, who developed OS SSI after abdominal surgery, in a general hospital, from June 2014 to June 2018. Population variables: age, gender, comorbidities (cancer, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, chronic renal failure, tobacco, immunosuppressants, Charlson score and obesity), ESR, quantitative CRP, imaging study (tomography (CT)/ ultrasound), type of drainage route (surgical, percutaneous). Outcomes variables: antibiotic patient-days, time to infection (TTI), CRP and ESR at the time of diagnosis (TD) and at the end of treatment (TET), rate of relapsing infection. Statistical analysis: Description of variables sort by patients under images follow-up and patients under CRP and ESR follow-up. Fisher test of relapsing infection was calculated between groups.ResultsIncluded: 76 patients. Twenty-six were followed with CT or ultrasound and 50 were followed with CRP and ESR. Forty women, with a mean age of 55 years (19–91) and an average score of the Charlson of 3.64 (0–10). Forty patients had cancer before surgery (52.63%). Microbiological diagnosis: 70/76 patients, the majority was polymicrobial. Average of antibiotics patient-days was 24.4 days (14 days of intravenous therapy). TTI: 8.65 days. Average CRP at the TD was 87.5 mg/L and 17.5 mg/L at TET. No differences in ESR values (31.9 mm to 33.5 mm). Percutaneous drainage: 46 patients. Surgical procedure: 27. Relapsing infection: 11,5% in images group vs. 4% in no images group; P = 0.33.ConclusionQuantitative CRP monitoring was useful to guide the duration of antimicrobial treatment. No differences of relapsing infection between groups was found.Disclosures
All authors: No reported disclosures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.