A theory for describing the evolution of the medianhadial crack system in the far field of sharp-indenter contacts is developed. Analysis is based on a model in which the complex elastic/plastic field beneath the indenter is resolved into elastic and residual components. The elastic component, being reversible, assumes a secondary role in the fracture process: although it does enhance downward (median) extension during the loading halfcycle, it suppresses surface (radial) extension to the extent that significant growth continues during unloading. The residual component accordingly provides the primary driving force for the crack configuration in the final stages of evolution, where the crack tends to near-half-penny geometry. On the hypothesis that the origin of the irreversible field lies in the accommodation of an expanding plastic hardness impression by the surrounding elastic matrix, the ensuing fracture mechanics relations for equilibrium crack growth are found to involve the ratio hardness-to-modulus as well as toughness. Observations of crack evolution in soda-lime glass provide a suitable calibration of indentation coefficients in these relations. The calibrated equations are then demonstrated to be capable of predicting the widely variable median and radial growth characteristics observed in other ceramic materials. The theory is shown to have a vital bearing on important practical areas of ceramics evaluation, including toughness and strength.

An examination is made of the sharp-indentation technique of strength-test precracking for toughness evaluation. The experimental approach follows that proposed by other workers but the theoretical analysis contains one vital new feature; the residual-stress term discussed in Part I of this study is now introduced explicitly into the strength formulation. This modification overcomes a major systematic discrepancy evident in the previous models and at the same time, by virtue of attendant changes in the nature of the crack stability prior to attaining a failure configuration, eliminates the need for fractographic measurements. Other advantages are also apparent, notably an insensitivity to postindentation radial crack extension. The main disadvantage is that only one result is obtained per specimen. Indentatiodstrength data from ceramics listed in Part I confirm the essential features of the theory and provide a suitable calibration factor. The method has special application to those materials which do not necessarily produce a well-defined radial crack pattern, in which case an "effective" K, appropriate to fracture properties at the flaw level is obtained.