In this research, we investigated the electrochemical behavior of copper (Cu) surfaces during chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) with alumina containing slurries. The variation of pH and the percent of oxidizer were tested against impressed anodic and cathodic potentials. The polarization curves as well as potential and current values were measured in order to investigate the effects of electrochemical interactions during polishing. The polishing performance was evaluated through friction, wear, and surface quality. Surface characterization was conducted using an atomic force microscope. The areas scanned contained surfaces having different post-CMP surface chemistry. In such, the electrochemical, chemical, and mechanical action could be revealed and compared in situ and simultaneously. Research results showed that in acidic environment, the low pH dominated the surface roughness over oxidizer and anodic current. At high pH, however, oxidizer and anodic current played important roles. As a result, an optimized polishing condition was proposed.
This paper discusses new techniques for elucidating removal mechanisms of copper during chemical-mechanical polishing. Two new approaches were used in this research. One is the linkage between electrochemical, passivation, and wear for removal mechanisms. The other is to use an atomic force microscope to analyze polished copper surfaces at a nanometer length scale. Effects of pH, concentration of oxidizer, cathodic current, and amount of abrasive particles on surface materials removal were studied. Our investigation indicates that a balance between passivation and removal is needed to achieve a good localized planarization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.