STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE.: To compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage alone (ACDF-CA) with cage and plate construct (ACDF-CPC) in regards to fusion rate, radiologic and clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: ACDF-CA has shown good results; however, debate exists regarding the high rate of complications such as pseudarthrosis, subsidence, and local kyphosis. In an attempt to avoid these complications, the authors have performed ACDF with cage and plate construct (ACDF-CPC). METHODS.: A total of 78 consecutive patients who underwent 1- or 2-level ACDF-CA or ACDF-CPC suffering from cervical radiculopathy were divided into 2 groups; Group A (n = 38) underwent ACDF-CA; Group B (n = 40) underwent ACDF-CPC. Fusion rate, segmental kyphosis, disc height, and subsidence rate were assessed by radiographs. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Robinson criteria. RESULTS.: Solid fusion was achieved in 78.9% (30/38) of subjects in group A compared to 97.5% (39/40) of subjects in group B (P = 0.01). Segmental kyphosis was noted in 42.1% (16/38) in group A compared with 10% (4/40) in group B (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease in disc height in group A compared to group B (P < 0.05). Subsidence occurred in 32.3% (19/59 levels) of group A compared with 9.7% (6/62 levels) of group B (P < 0.01). Clinical outcomes were similar for both treatment groups. The pseudarthrosis rate in group A was higher than that in group B (P = 0.01). Revision surgery was required in 10.5% (4/38) of group A, whereas none of group B required reoperation (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION.: The use of cage and plate construct in 1- or 2-level ACDF results in a more lordotic alignment, an increased disc height, a higher fusion rate, a lower subsidence rate, and a lower complication rate than that of cage alone; however, there is no significant difference in clinical outcome between groups.

No abstract

Concern has been raised because of reports of inflammatory swelling following the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7). The purpose of this study is to compare the inflammatory action of rhBMP-7 with those of rhBMP-2. ELISA assays (IL-6, TNF-a) were used to measure the cytokine response to different concentrations of rhBMP-7 and -2. Recombinant human BMP-7 was absorbed into absorbable collagen sponges and different amounts were implanted either subcutaneously (SC) or intramuscularly (IM) into the backs of rats. Using MRI and MIPAV software, we measured the degree of soft tissue edema at 3 h and at 2, 4, and 7 days postoperatively. After sacrificing rats on day 7 the inflammatory zone and mass were measured and the tissue examined histologically. Soft tissue edema after rhBMP-7 and rhBMP-2 implantation was dose-dependent and peaked at 3 h for the subcutaneous implants and at 2 days for the intramuscular implants. RhBMP-7 was associated with a significantly smaller soft tissue edema volume than was rhBMP-2 only at the highest dose (20 mg/ml). Both rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 triggered dose-dependent inflammatory reactions. Compared to rhBMP-2, rhBMP-7 is associated with somewhat smaller soft tissue edema volumes. Although rhBMP-7 is associated with an inflammatory reaction leading to soft tissue edema, at high doses this response is significantly less than that seen with rhBMP-2. Our animal model can be used to test materials that could ameliorate this reaction. ß

Swelling and inflammation after rhBMP-2 use are dose-dependent. Swelling may be due to direct contact as well as spread in the plane of access. The causes are a robust inflammatory reaction as well as sterile seroma and encapsulated hematoma formation.

Changes in sagittal alignment may lead to kinematic changes in the lumbar spine. This may subsequently influence load bearing and the distribution of disc degeneration at each level. Sagittal alignment, disc degeneration, and segmental mobility likely have a reciprocal influence on one another.