A new crosswell electromagnetic (EM) tool, now in field test, provides unique means to remotely sense the resistivity between two wells without having to drill an intermediate well. The wells can be open hole or cased with fiberglass, nonmagnetic chromium steel, or ordinary magnetic carbon steel. This tool allows one to determine the resistivity distribution between wells spaced up to 1000 m apart. It is an induction measurement with a large magnetic field transmitter in one well and sensitive low-noise receivers in a second well. The transmitter generates a time varying field in the frequency range of 5 Hz to 1000 Hz. Since the transmitter and the receivers are not at a fixed position, the primary field cannot be cancelled as in conventional induction tools. Instead, the receiver senses the primary field of the transmitter combined with the secondary field produced by the formation between the wells. This secondary field increases with frequency of operation, formation conductivity and spacing between wells. In general, a high-frequency measurement with large formation effect is combined with a low-frequency effect to provide a geometry correction for the wells. Data from multiple transmitter and receiver positions are processed through a two-dimensional non-linear inversion algorithm to produce a resistivity image of the formation between the wells. A priori information about the formation as well as conventional well logs are used to constrain or improve the image. Although the performance of this technique is strongly dependent upon the specific problem, the resulting image can be used for detecting bypassed oil, or in a time-lapse application, it can be used to monitor the movement of a reservoir or of injected fluid. This paper presents the unique tool features, the survey planning process, and factors important for success as well as modeling and measurement examples. In addition, sensitivity to frequency and the starting model used as the initial step in processing the data to an image are examined. Introduction Traditional resistivity logging tools measure the formation resistivity at a distance of a few inches to perhaps ten feet from the wellbore. This is generally sufficient to determine the properties of the formation beyond the invaded zone and to characterize the formation near the wellbores. There are no commercial tools that directly measure the resistivity at large distances from the wells. The crosswell EM tool is designed to meet that need, providing resistivity measurements at reservoir level. This capability is important as in mature fields fluid movement typically occurs over periods of years or decades. Whether the field is undergoing primary production or enhanced production, it is important to be able to identify the movement of fluids at distances of hundreds or thousands of meters from the wells. Although crosswell EM logging has existed since the mid 1990s (e.g., Alumbaugh and Morrison, 1995a; Wilt et al., 1995) recent industrial interest coupled with advances in technology have enabled the development of a next-generation system that we have named Cross-well EM Resistivity. This system provides significant advances in terms of measurement accuracy, resolution, logging speed, field operations, modeling, and processing tools.
TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax +1-972-952-9435. AbstractBeginning in 2003 Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) began testing the crosswell electromagnetic method for waterflood monitoring in Oman. The tomographic method, which determines interwell resistivity from inductive EM signals, is well suited for tracking injected water volumes, especially when this fluid is a low resistivity, high salinity brine.The method was applied in two Omani oil fields for tracking injected water. In the first field several vertical well pattern pilots were established to measure water flood sweep efficiency in two zones of a shallow, but relatively thick, multi layer reservoir. In the shallow zone a two year monitoring program revealed that much of the injected water had bypassed the reservoir, likely escaping through high permeability streaks. In the deeper pilot the EM results showed an excellent interwell sweep but some leakage to the overlying formation. For the second field the method was applied in existing widely-spaced barefoot injection wells. In this old line drive flood we wished to image the residual oil saturation and injected water volumes. In this case the resistivity anomalies in this mature water flood were fairly subtle. Interwell formation heterogeneity could only be revealed by calculating resistivity differences between the initial or background model and the image after inversion. One of these difference images revealed that a significant oil bank remained adjacent to the central producer.The overall experience with the crosswell EM tomography revealed that this technique can have great value in imaging water flooding. Drawbacks include the costs of installing special monitoring wells that are required under some conditions and the low resolution that is obtained in cases where the length of the survey interval is short relative to the well spacing. A good reservoir model is required in order to use constraints that are required for steering the crosswell EM inversion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.